Eagles Green
Footballguy
This second I have Turner in there. I've changed it 10 times.
Last edited by a moderator:
Exactly, with the information you have and the matchup, what else can you do. You hope that the Falcons are starting Turner not out of desperation in a must win situation but because he appears to be able to carry the load. It does seem this year that teams have sat star players like a Big Ben or a Mike Westbrook if they don't appear to be ready to go. I'll be pissed if I see in the 1st quarter Turner's limping around and he's out for the game. Just enough damage for most Snelling owners to bench their guy and enough bait for Turner owners to insert their stud versus a horrendous run D.Wrigley said:Benching Snelling, adding Turner to starting lineup.What else can you do?Hope for best
And no offense to you.....but it makes no sense that you think Turner is going to produce at a top level against a bottom level run D and you're benching him in favor of Charles.No offense to anyone here, but the consensus hasn't exactly worked out most weeks this season. I tend to think that Turner will start and produce at a top level. But I also can't risk taking any risks with just two weeks left and in a dogfight for my division title. I'm starting Jamaal Charles over Turner which is a huge risk in its own right since I'm also starting Chris Chambers. If you're starting two KC players in a given week, your chances for success should be considered quite limited.Good luck to all!![]()
Let me clarify:The consensus seems to be that you can't risk playing Turner if you have other viable options. I think Turner will buck the consensus and have a great game. I just can't take the chance that he reaggravates the injury and I'm sitting around not getting points at a critical position during a critical spot.My dig at consensus plays is that most weeks, the consensus has seemed off (like when people were benching Betts with an ankle injury playing in the mud and he had a huge game).And no offense to you.....but it makes no sense that you think Turner is going to produce at a top level against a bottom level run D and you're benching him in favor of Charles.No offense to anyone here, but the consensus hasn't exactly worked out most weeks this season. I tend to think that Turner will start and produce at a top level. But I also can't risk taking any risks with just two weeks left and in a dogfight for my division title. I'm starting Jamaal Charles over Turner which is a huge risk in its own right since I'm also starting Chris Chambers. If you're starting two KC players in a given week, your chances for success should be considered quite limited.Good luck to all!![]()
Same here, Scott over Turner/Snelling.biggamer3 said:starting Scott over turner
If you are going to make a statement like that....you need to let everyone know what you are doing so they can do the opposite.In regards to Turner/Snellng, whatever I do will be wrong...FMLsigh

+1In regards to Turner/Snellng, whatever I do will be wrong...FMLsigh
Agree. As someone who played BB and have had many Ankle sprains, when it's hurt, it's very easy to re hurt. Granted I never had NFL type rehab.its onething to run around the practice field...its an entirely different situation to get tackled by 3 or 4 nfl defendersand all that wieght on a high ankle sprain...i can see turner lasting a series or 2 then coming out..talk about FUBAR![]()
Turner...Snelling....Turner...Snelling...aw, eff it...Turner :(Start Snelling with confidence...If you are going to make a statement like that....you need to let everyone know what you are doing so they can do the opposite.In regards to Turner/Snellng, whatever I do will be wrong...FMLsigh![]()
I wouldn't think so.we don't know what's going on w/turner's ankle.I wouldn't say snelling is a great option, but if turner comes back in a couple weeks, tweaks the ankle again, and opens the door for snelling in w16 vs buffalo, then you've got something.in the meantime, I'd say he has some marginal random value just because turner might be out.Has Snelling's value been reduced to nothing now?