Probably has less frustrations with Hunter than Calvin because the expectations are so much lower. But that's good news and a great article, finally highlighting that the coaching style is a lot of barking which triggers these articles that Hunter is in the doghouse.
another point is the earlier tough love in evidence from receiver coach jefferson and SS pollard, is because by their own admission, they see a lot of potential they hope is realized, because if it is, the team could be much stronger.
So many were like you this offseason and didn't believe that Hunter wasn't getting it done. It was always blown off as coach speak. The post by Faust beneath yours about demands you guys reconsider your previous thoughts on the situation.
lets back up for a moment...
1 - i don't know if i said i didn't believe hunter wasn't getting it done... or if i was blowing it off as coach speak...
2 - i would appreciate it if you would pay me the courtesy of not lumping me in with a nebulous, you's guys category... if you have need for a point of clarification with an individual or several people, bring it up with them separately and specifically... if it involves a larger group, no need to personalize things by funnelling multiple issues you seem to have with others onto a focal point poster...
just make a general comment to the thread (if you have a specific question or concern about something I said, that is different, than please address that to me, of course)...
3 - some people thought you were being overly critical, or took you to task for, what (i take it) they took to be blurring the lines between passing along news and inserting your own narrative (prima donna?)... that wasn't me... sometimes i also make personal observations and comments, but when possible i try and use links, cites, attribution so others can judge for themselves the context and relevance of the information... maybe he was a prima donna, but it would be helpful to know if titans insiders said that, or that was you reading into it... that is the good thing about cites and links... if you have one, i have one, you have comments, i have comments, we all have biases, nobody is exempt, obviously i include myself... than the thread can do a sort of conceptual TRIANGULATION, judging for themselves between the different links, quotes, articles, etc., and the comments spurred by them, what is the best way to reconcile the various known facts and interpretations for themselves... the whole prima donna commentary was somewhat controversial, as i recall, as it came on the heels that jefferson was riding him for missing OTAs when he had hamstring injury, there were conflicting reports, with different elements of coaching staff or front office maybe not on same page on whether his absence was understood or resented... this wasn't really nailed down definitively... later, when he came back, was he being coached hard for being lazy, or was the injury lingering? if the latter, does that make him a prima donna? i have heard that he has a humble demeanor, which is kind of the exact opposite of a prima donna... is the biggest issue that he needs to be more physical? pay more attention to detail... hustle more? not everybody would use the phrase prima donna to describe these potential issues...
4 - i took pains several times to say i like him more in dynasty and redraft, that could hardly have been clearer... you took objection to a post i made about three weeks ago, reiterating specific positive comments jefferson and pollard had said, countering earlier negative reports from them or reporting of incidents surrounding them... it is common sense that when a poster makes a positive or a negative comment, there isn't an assumption that they are anything as simplemindedly as 100% positive and 0% critical, or vice verce, on a given prospect (you aren't like that, right, so extend to others the respect that they are, like you, capable of a sense of balance, perspective and proportion)...
5 - as near as i can tell, what started the immediate ruckus was a report that hunter might be a game day inactive because they may only suit up four this season... than you did the equivalent of saying, i told you you were wrong, you should have known this
... i thought at first, not the greatest form, as the season hasn't even started yet, it was phrased as a maybe that we don't know for sure will even materialize yet, we don't know if it is a temporary circumstance... but that is cool, good to get the info out there, i just think it could have been disseminated differently... the main issue you seemed to be focusing on upthread was that in your opinion he had a wrong/bad attitude or temperment in need of adjusting... i don't remember anywhere in the thread, you, or anybody, stating the titans would probably suit up just four this year, and hunter was likely a game day inactive... so that is revisionist history on your part to say others were "wrong" and you are "right"... i'm not aware of any earlier news on this, so maybe even beat reporters were taken by surprise on this matter... it is bad form, to fault others, and take credit for something that wasn't known several weeks or a month ago...
but enough of that...
you said elsewhere recently that, in your opinion, hunter was brought in to push britt... you could be right, but that doesn't make sense to me... i don't think they part with a 2014 3rd to move up six spots in the second, for some kind of an oblique, indirect move that might make britt play harder, but in and of itself, not have a tangible payoff...
imo, they brought hunter because they think he could be a great WR (if they wanted a good WR, they could have waited six picks and let the draft come to them, there were even great WRs like wheaton avail in third)... he was taken within a half dozen picks of hopkins and patterson at end of first, beginning of second round... there were reports (again, upthread i think), that titans had a high first round grade on him...
it was reported (this and other links can also be found upthread) that hunter didn't necessarily need britt to bust for health or off field reasons to get future playing time... he could in fact be a complement on the outside, with wright sliding to slot... but britt has been hurt a lot, and few NFL players were seemingly in trouble with the law as much as he was in past two or three years... so if hunter proves capable of assuming a bigger role once he becomes acclimated to the game (so went the rationale), at worst, he could be a complemement to britt... at best, his replacement... about the latter, even if britt manages to stay healthy, and keep his nose clean this year... do they risk a big financial investment with a lot of guaranteed money, on a player representing so much risk from several fronts (medical and intangibles)... he is very talented when healthy, but i think that is a tough call... i'm not even sure the titans know for certain what they will do (as has been pointed out, we don't even know if front office or coaching staff will survive the season), even if current regime does survive... it could depend on how good he looks, lots of factors... maybe this reflects my bias, but i have some serious questions about whether britt will be in TEN in 2014... i could also see teams more desperate at WR being more willing to take risk...
it is a bit disturbing if hunter doesn't suit up at all in 2013... how common is it for team to carry only four WRs? if everybody did it, presumably more rookie WRs wouldn't be suiting up...
i understand some people seeing parallels with meacham if he doesn't suit up... from what i have seen, hunter is more talented, so he should have a more favorable prognosis as to his long term future... before hurting his knee, some scouts were saying he resembled moss... i don't remember that level of respect for meacham at any point in his career or during the scouting process? maybe the thread can jump in on that historical comparison of their respective scouting process arcs...
to become more fantasy relevant in dynasty (never saw him as great redraft option), he needs to leap frog nate washington (thought to be gone, that isn't happening, one more year on contract after this?) and damian williams... i don't know when exactly that will happen, maybe his progress has been delayed, but i think he is more talented than them, has a brighter future than them, and it is a matter of time before he inexorably rises up the depth chart... with possible apex upside in a few years... that is my outlook and time frame... i had conviction before, a potentially temporary setback isn't going to cause me to pull the plug after a few weeks (which has been discussed in thread, not saying you said or are suggesting, let alone advocating that)...