I'm a big DHK fan, but he clearly lost round 2, and should have lost 29-28 vs Diaz. I really expected better of Joe Rogan, as a BJJ guy, than to say it was clear DHK won round 2, when all he did was secure a takedown and defend sub attempts for the entire round. DHK did no damage to Diaz. Kim landed 0 effective strikes. Diaz landed a few pitter-patter strikes from the bottom, but Nate was constantly going for sub attempts the entire round. I'm disappointed as held out hope that some judge's would rightfully give a fighter a round who was on his back for most of the round, and this was a clear case of round where that should happed. The fact that it was in Nevada, where presumably they have the best judges (NV or CA) makes it worse.
edit: I'm really happen Fightmetric agreed with me on Diaz-Kim.
http://blog.fightmetric.com/2011/01/kim-vs...statistics.html