What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Universal Health Care - Let's make this happen (1 Viewer)

Better outcomes? What planet are you on?

Less costs because people are dying before they can get in to see a doctor.  or just giving up.
Better outcomes, longer lifespans, less deaths at birth, longer success with cancer treatments, better results with hearth surgery...the list is endless.  Google is your friend

 
No it really isn't and I am pretty sure you know that.  When countries like Cuba and Slovenia (and 54 others that are better than us) can provide higher quality health care with no dramatic wait times to see doctors I am pretty sure the Exceptional U.S.A. can do the same.

Why do people persist in pushing veritably false talking points like this? What is the end game there? Save a couple bucks on taxes but have an increasingly unhealthy population that ends up costing society far more then if we had top quality, accessible health care for everyone?

A healthy population is a productive one. We will have more people in the tax base meaning those precious anti-taxers won't see an increase in their taxes over time.  
What is the population of Cuba and slovenia again?   What is the US population?  The only talking points being pushed here are yours. :shrug:  

 
Better outcomes? What planet are you on?

Less costs because people are dying before they can get in to see a doctor.  or just giving up.
MT, where are you coming up with this? 57th in infant mortality MT, 57th. That's us.

The CIA, yes that CIA, calls that the benchmark for measuring the quality of health care. It is verifiably false say that these other 56 countries have lesser outcomes.

 
What is the population of Cuba and slovenia again?   What is the US population?  The only talking points being pushed here are yours. :shrug:  
Who cares? How is that relevant?

How does having a healthy tax base hurt us as opposed to having an unhealthy one?

 
It seems to me that our ranges of health outcomes is far greater than most other industrialized nations. At the top, we have the best health care in the world, as long as you can afford it and/or have great insurance.  At the bottom, it's far worse than comparable nations.

And from my understanding (no first-hand knowledge here), the notion of "waiting 2 years to see a doctor" is a myth in general, but waits for specialists or some surgeries can be far greater in countries with universal health care vs. Americans with good insurance.

So it seems to me that going to universal health care requires a little bit worse (yet still very good) care at the top so that everyone can have basic needs met. Many will never, ever accept this (those with good insurance).  But it's about our willingness to accept a sacrifice at the top for the good of the nation as a whole.  Doesn't seem like we have a good track record in this regard.

 
MT, where are you coming up with this? 57th in infant mortality MT, 57th. That's us.

The CIA, yes that CIA, calls that the benchmark for measuring the quality of health care. It is verifiably false say that these other 56 countries have lesser outcomes.
Typical of people like him he only cares about outcomes for rich white people...and those are pretty good

 
BTW apparently we're 43rd in Life Expectancy.

Yeah, definitely can't improve on 57th and 43rd.

American Mediocralism!!!  Dare to shoot for the middle!

 
Typical of people like him he only cares about outcomes for rich white people...and those are pretty good
OH boy, here we go with this tripe again.  "If you don't agree with me you're racist, bigot, evil *******!"

We really going to play this game?  Haven't you guys learned anything?

 
OH boy, here we go with this tripe again.  "If you don't agree with me you're racist, bigot, evil *******!"

We really going to play this game?  Haven't you guys learned anything?
For a guy that is completely ignoring the fact that the USA pretty much sucks at everything when it comes to health care it seems like that can be the only rational reasoning behind it.

 
For a guy that is completely ignoring the fact that the USA pretty much sucks at everything when it comes to health care it seems like that can be the only rational reasoning behind it.
No killface, it isn't. It was an unnecessary statement that failed to advance the conversation.  MT is actually a pretty smart guy but he doesn't seem to be in the mood to provide a well reasoned argument against UHC.

I find his verifiably false statements to be a little frustrating as well but it is no call to start making attacks on his character.

 
No killface, it isn't. It was an unnecessary statement that failed to advance the conversation.  MT is actually a pretty smart guy but he doesn't seem to be in the mood to provide a well reasoned argument against UHC.

I find his verifiably false statements to be a little frustrating as well but it is no call to start making attacks on his character.
It has come up a 100 times in these discussions.  They dismiss the rankings by saying it's because we have so many poor and uneducated people that ruin our otherwise exceptional health comes.  That is exactly what i was insinuating...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course killface, MT also may be baiting us hoping for just that type of response to change the conversation towards partisan bickering and away from substantive conversation.

Like I said, he's a smart guy.

 
It comes up a 100 times in these discussions.  They dismiss the rankings by saying it's because we have so many poor and uneducated people that ruin our otherwise exceptional health comes.  That is exactly what i was insinuating...
Did he say that I'm this thread? I must have missed that post.

BnB made a comment along those lines, I responded to it and am hoping to hear more from him about that.

 
Did he say that I'm this thread? I must have missed that post.

BnB made a comment along those lines, I responded to it and am hoping to hear more from him about that.
To be fair he didn't but as you probably are aware this discussion has been had many times on the board and it always ends in the same dismissal.  The world's health systems are a mess because of universal access and the great USA rankings aren't poor, we are just a country filled with poor uneducated people.  I feel like we just had this whole argument a couple of months ago

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It has come up a 100 times in these discussions.  They dismiss the rankings by saying it's because we have so many poor and uneducated people that ruin our otherwise exceptional health comes.  That is exactly what i was insinuating...
When someone here suggests that Cuba should be our model and I read about their recently achieved medical firsts in Cuba, I have my doubts. I suspect our access to soda pizza ? food drugs and booze might have more to do with our health than our doctors

 
When someone here suggests that Cuba should be our model and I read about their recently achieved medical firsts in Cuba, I have my doubts. I suspect our access to soda pizza ? food drugs and booze might have more to do with our health than our doctors
That was going to be my next point about our 57th/43rd rankings.

And it definitely hurts us but let's not act like virtually every single country ahead of us in these rankings doesn't have access similar bad food choices.

 
BTW apparently we're 43rd in Life Expectancy.

Yeah, definitely can't improve on 57th and 43rd.

American Mediocralism!!!  Dare to shoot for the middle!
I think you're looking at this all wrong.  You need to look at it from the perspective of what we get for what we pay.   

 
That was going to be my next point about our 57th/43rd rankings.

And it definitely hurts us but let's not act like virtually every single country ahead of us in these rankings doesn't have access similar bad food choices.
But when you single out just cuba from that list, he does make a good point.   

 
That was going to be my next point about our 57th/43rd rankings.

And it definitely hurts us but let's not act like virtually every single country ahead of us in these rankings doesn't have access similar bad food choices.
I really don't know the answer. Just asking questions about why.  

 
If our people are too stupid to use better access to health care to improve their health and our government is incapable of administering a universal plan anyway, we're gonna have to rethink this whole "exceptionalism" idea at some point.

 
That will happen when the Insurance industry dies and we are willing to accept a 40% tax rate.
To be clear, you're saying my tax rate will be 40% but I won't have to pay over $300/month for health insurance and no more co-pays?  And everyone will have health insurance?

Deal.

 
I got another one: The Right (can't call them Republicans because they're not) likes to shut down clinics that provide low cost health care, making it increasingly difficult for lower income people to access health care.
1) Sabotage something

2) Say it's broken

3) Get rid of it

This is like page 1 of their playbook.

 
Don't know but I bet we could make a list.

I'll start with the fact that many mothers can't afford prenatal care.
In my rural area, and RN I know says that almost 50% of kids born here are addicted to opiates.  I thought that sounded high but others have confirmed.  

 
Not sure I see the correlation here with health care.  If there is one thing we can all agree on, it's that governments that want to stay in power run their military exceptionally well.
Sure you do.  The assertion was government is totally incompetent. I simply pointed out the hypocrisy of somebody stating that and yet wanted to further fund the military.  If they are incompetent, the last thing we need to do is give them more money to kill people with.  

 
Tim is right that it may be inevitable.  It distresses me that people have that much faith in government when it demonstrates on a daily basis that it is incapable of handling such a responsibility.
The government handles tons of stuff in a fine fashion -- at least finer for the citizenry then the privatized industry when they get their hooks in.

 
I really don't know the answer. Just asking questions about why.  
Life expectancy is largely due to accidental deaths (car accidents, drugs, guns).

We have different infant mortality metrics than most nations.  We count any baby born.  Most nations don't do that.  Poor teen mothers also don't always get proper care or even know they are pregnant.

Neither has anything to do with the quality of care for the majority of people.  One is cultural and the other is limited access by some (many are eligible for Medicaid, but don't apply).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That will happen when the Insurance industry dies
Health insurance companies are pretty much out of the insurance business already.   Their business is mostly to provide administrative services to "self funded" employers (most large and increasingly mid size employers including the government) and government programs (Medicaid MSO, Medicare Advantage (Part C)).  There is a reason why you hear about the losses and exits on the exchanges (where they sell "insurance") and the conflicting stories about the gravy train of the ACA (Medicaid expansion),   We could move to a single payer model and still keep the health insurance industry very happy.   If one believes the government is not capable of managing health care as well as private players then keeping the insurance companies around for these tasks would be the "best of both worlds".   It wouldn't really be true that adding the overhead of a profiting middle man with their additional administrative overhead (including marketing) isn't making things cheaper, but we can simply pay the more we are paying today to get there faster keeping the health insurance companies around for a while.  We can achieve the cost savings of cutting out the profit driven factors later.

and we are willing to accept a 40% tax rate
The average tax burden is around 30% for just income based taxes (i.e. ignores sales and property taxes).  The average American then spends 10% of income on health insurance premiums and deductibles (and while this growth has slowed down, these costs are still growing faster than wages).  So other than "sticker shock" for the ignorant, how is this an issue?

 
So the kid should suffer?  You have kids? 
Where in the hell did I say the kid should suffer?  I'm saying universal healthcare isn't going to keep the dumb mom from taking drugs.  She's still a moron with or without the healthcare.

If you're going to project other thoughts here, at least quote me accurately.  I've said 100 times I'm all for healthcare for everyone.  I don't agree necessarily with the Dem's just taxing the F out of the middle class to achieve it but that's a different topic.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top