Uranium One Investigation - A Fresh Look (1 Viewer)

[Ramsay Hunt Experience]

What a surprise that the guy who routinely gets #### wrong on a wide variety of topics thinks that credentials relating to actually knowing something on a topic are irrelevant.  

 

[General Malaise]

No.

A bunch of dudes  with 50k posts on an anonymous message board claimed it was debunked. A few of them have law degrees, one of them from Duke, so they are given instant credibility without actually providing any facts.

Another guy has a "friend" who supposedly is "connected" in DC. This guy is known for fabricating stories, not sure why anyone would believe him.

I posted several links in the Russia thread the other day laying out exactly what happened, what was questionable, what was done about it.

The usual suspects all refused to read and comment on the links. They just informed me that so and so said it wasn't true and I was a troll because I was bringing up a topic that did not fit their conspiracy.

The U1 story is just getting warmed up. People can claim it was debunked all they want, but that will not change the facts.

If you are genuinely interested in U1 (and not just trolling with your post) I would recommend reading these two articles. They provide a good start on the corruption surrounding U1.

https://www.themarketswork.com/2017/11/04/foia-documents-fbi-preservation-requests-the-cfius-uranium-one/

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration

Oh, hello turkey.  We're one year and almost 2 months since this post of yours.  Can you link me to the 'warming up' part of the U1 story?

Thanks!

Your daddy

 

[roadkill1292]

What a surprise that the guy who routinely gets #### wrong on a wide variety of topics thinks that credentials relating to actually knowing something on a topic are irrelevant.  

In light of another year of reading jonessed's inaccuracies and obfuscations, this was an extremely underrated post.

 

[General Malaise]

No.

A bunch of dudes  with 50k posts on an anonymous message board claimed it was debunked. A few of them have law degrees, one of them from Duke, so they are given instant credibility without actually providing any facts.

Another guy has a "friend" who supposedly is "connected" in DC. This guy is known for fabricating stories, not sure why anyone would believe him.

I posted several links in the Russia thread the other day laying out exactly what happened, what was questionable, what was done about it.

The usual suspects all refused to read and comment on the links. They just informed me that so and so said it wasn't true and I was a troll because I was bringing up a topic that did not fit their conspiracy.

The U1 story is just getting warmed up. People can claim it was debunked all they want, but that will not change the facts.

If you are genuinely interested in U1 (and not just trolling with your post) I would recommend reading these two articles. They provide a good start on the corruption surrounding U1.

https://www.themarketswork.com/2017/11/04/foia-documents-fbi-preservation-requests-the-cfius-uranium-one/

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration

@Opie your turn to show me where this U1 story got warmed up since this was posted a year and 2 months ago.