We've been doing that constantly to feed the military industrial complex, so that's not going to stop.Meh. We'll just start a war...blow someplace up.....then rebuild it and make fat stacks.
oolIf they don't want us to run up the scoreboard the defense should do something.![]()
Fun Fact... our debt totals over 16x the total amount of ALL hard US Currency in existence.Surprised there is no recognition of this in all the election debates.
Fixed.Eh. We have assets too. We could probably recover half that just by pimping out our Hollywood actressesandas porn stars to Middle Eastern royalty.
"out military is too weak as it is!!!!"Only 40 years of no military budget, and we'd be in the black!
Or less than half that of no Medicare/Medicaid spending.Only 40 years of no military budget, and we'd be in the black!
Our parents left it for us (and are still much of those in power).So unfair to leave this for our children.
I'd be concerned when the US loses the ability to create US dollars out of thin air. Until that time, the nominal debt number is pretty meaningless until compared to size of the economy. Even then, it isn't of paramount importance.To those who aren't concerned about this amount of debt; is there an amount that would concern you? What would that amount of debt be? Just curious...
WARNING: clicking this link may cause seizures
...if we continue charging people a tax to pay for Medicare at the same time, right?Or less than half that of no Medicare/Medicaid spending.Only 40 years of no military budget, and we'd be in the black!
You'll never have children. Problem solved!So unfair to leave this for our children.
Well yes, just as your idea would continue charging people a tax to pay for something that would no longer exist as well. I didn't say either idea was a good one....if we continue charging people a tax to pay for Medicare at the same time, right?Or less than half that of no Medicare/Medicaid spending.Only 40 years of no military budget, and we'd be in the black!
Plus, if we start eliminating federal trust funds, we can wipe out 15% of the debt right off the top!Well yes, just as your idea would continue charging people a tax to pay for something that would no longer exist as well. I didn't say either idea was a good one....if we continue charging people a tax to pay for Medicare at the same time, right?Or less than half that of no Medicare/Medicaid spending.Only 40 years of no military budget, and we'd be in the black!
I love these, because that logic also allows me to pretend that my family also owns the rights to 3,500 barrels of unproduced oil, God knows how many cubic feet of natural gas, 10 acres of land, and all sorts of other goodies.
Debt being greater than GDP is a "nominal" debt number? What is a safe GDP/Debt ratio? Where does it get dangerous?I'd be concerned when the US loses the ability to create US dollars out of thin air. Until that time, the nominal debt number is pretty meaningless until compared to size of the economy. Even then, it isn't of paramount importance.To those who aren't concerned about this amount of debt; is there an amount that would concern you? What would that amount of debt be? Just curious...
What would happen if we just printed 20 trillion and sent it to whoever we owe? Fiat currency is very confusing to me.I'd be concerned when the US loses the ability to create US dollars out of thin air. Until that time, the nominal debt number is pretty meaningless until compared to size of the economy. Even then, it isn't of paramount importance.To those who aren't concerned about this amount of debt; is there an amount that would concern you? What would that amount of debt be? Just curious...
The problem with any analysis of federal debt is that it fails to account for federal assets. The value of the technically recoverable fossil fuel assets on federal lands alone is six times the national debt.Debt being greater than GDP is a "nominal" debt number?I'd be concerned when the US loses the ability to create US dollars out of thin air. Until that time, the nominal debt number is pretty meaningless until compared to size of the economy. Even then, it isn't of paramount importance.To those who aren't concerned about this amount of debt; is there an amount that would concern you? What would that amount of debt be? Just curious...
Serious question... I don't pretend to be the next Warren Buffett.
It's dangerous when the markets decide it's dangerous, which is also the same time it's too late to do anything about it.Debt being greater than GDP is a "nominal" debt number? What is a safe GDP/Debt ratio? Where does it get dangerous?I'd be concerned when the US loses the ability to create US dollars out of thin air. Until that time, the nominal debt number is pretty meaningless until compared to size of the economy. Even then, it isn't of paramount importance.To those who aren't concerned about this amount of debt; is there an amount that would concern you? What would that amount of debt be? Just curious...
Serious question... I don't pretend to be the next Warren Buffett.
Actually it's almost exactly 7 acres per person. Like down to the hundredth of an acre exactly 7.I love these, because that logic also allows me to pretend that my family also owns the rights to 3,500 barrels of unproduced oil, God knows how many cubic feet of natural gas, 10 acres of land, and all sorts of other goodies.
Only 5 ounces of gold, though, And we have to share our tank and airplane with the entire neighborhood.![]()