From your link: Apr. 19, 2020 - 3:50 - Foreign affairs journalist Gordon Chang joins Jon Scott to discuss the U.S. probe into whether the virus escaped from Wuhan lab.
Sure...but odd that some that argued so much that Democrats wanting ongoing oversight committees were in a witch hunt...and told that it shouldn't happen while we are still going through this...yet, a full scale investigation is needed now?Up front this feels politically driven but I’ll remain open minded. And an IC report without Grenell’s or other non-professionals’ fingerprints will be needed for this to be viable. A twist is that input from virology experts will be needed as well.
Right. This is something that Congress could be provided right now. I'll add that really such a report should already exist. Right now the president has reports and briefings on the derivation of the virus, so let's see it.Sure...but odd that some that argued so much that Democrats wanting ongoing oversight committees were in a witch hunt...and told that it shouldn't happen while we are still going through this...yet, a full scale investigation is needed now?
I think a real report would be great...this feels more politically motivated to push blame than it is to really find the truth.
US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a marketCouldn't find a CNN link.
Fox link: April 19US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a market
CNN)US intelligence and national security officials say the United States government is looking into the possibility that the novel coronavirus spread from a Chinese laboratory rather than a market, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter who caution it is premature to draw any conclusions.
The theory is one of multiple being pursued by investigators as they attempt to determine the origin of the coronavirus that has resulted in a pandemic and killed hundreds of thousands. The US does not believe the virus was associated with bioweapons research and the sources indicated there is currently no indication the virus was man-made. Officials noted that the intelligence community is also exploring a range of other theories regarding the origination of the virus, as would typically be the case for high-profile incidents, according to an intelligence source.
And the thread title doesn't describe either of these two articles.Fox link: April 19
CNN link: April 15
LOL
Anyway, this whole story could turn out to be bad news for Trump if true. The Trump administration was warned about this lab 2 years ago. The last thing Trump needs right now is an investigation into whether Trump knew (or should have known) that this lab was being reckless with potential bioweapons.
Everything right now is politically driven. Due dilgence is needed is all areas of this regardless of what side you are on..Up front this feels politically driven but I’ll remain open minded. And an IC report without Grenell’s or other non-professionals’ fingerprints will be needed for this to be viable. A twist is that input from virology experts will be needed as well.
I disagree with you there on the first point, I firmly believe we have professional men and women in our government in a wide variety of fields that work every day for what's best of us, regardless of their political leanings.Everything right now is politically driven. Due dilgence is needed is all areas of this regardless of what side you are on..
Stories like these are exactly why I despise politics as we know them now. I don`t like Trump, I like some of the trade things he has done. If Trump came downFox link: April 19
CNN link: April 15
LOL
Anyway, this whole story could turn out to be bad news for Trump if true. The Trump administration was warned about this lab 2 years ago. The last thing Trump needs right now is an investigation into whether Trump knew (or should have known) that this lab was being reckless with potential bioweapons.
I will agree you are half right on the first point. Being in the auto business my whole life I know and have met so many politicians in Detroit , been part of closed city meetings where people have had a cocktail or three. Life is not what we think it is for people out of control. Mine included.I disagree with you there on the first point, I firmly believe we have professional men and women in our government in a wide variety of fields that work every day for what's best of us, regardless of their political leanings.
Oh I have no illusions. I'm from New Orleans my friend, and I've seen some bad things up close. - But I also know good, decent DOJ people have helped clean up those same politicians. There are good guys out there.I will agree you are half right on the first point. Being in the auto business my whole life I know and have met so many politicians in Detroit , been part of closed city meetings where people have had a cocktail or three. Life is not what we think it is for people out of control. Mine included.
I will never forget I was at an after Auto Show party and there were many people drinking and one up and coming prosecutor`s said "It takes a good prosecutor to convict a guilty man, it takes a great one to convict an innocent man" And everyone started laughing. I was appalled..Oh I have no illusions. I'm from New Orleans my friend, and I've seen some bad things up close. - But I also know good, decent DOJ people have helped clean up those same politicians. There are good guys out there.
Evidence, you say?I will say that is plausible that the virus was being studied and escaped containment (maybe it mutated and infected a researcher). Biocontainment isn't infallible, just like every other security measure.
However, I'm skeptical that this is just another distraction and misdirection from this country's leadership that has abdicated their responsibilities and duties to serve and protect this country.
This report must present bulletproof evidence if it brings any accusations forward.
What should he have done 2 years ago? Bomb the lab? Gone to WHO?Fox link: April 19
CNN link: April 15
LOL
Anyway, this whole story could turn out to be bad news for Trump if true. The Trump administration was warned about this lab 2 years ago. The last thing Trump needs right now is an investigation into whether Trump knew (or should have known) that this lab was being reckless with potential bioweapons.
Please stay on topic. Do you agree with my statement regarding the investigation into the origin of COVID19? Do you have any related thoughts?Evidence, you say?
I was under the impression that just mere allegations and hearsay was good enough for 100% proof of guilt.
What has changed?
What should he have done 2 years ago? Bomb the lab? Gone to WHO?
Well if you read the news stories in the OP, Trump’s State Department made recommendations.What should he have done 2 years ago? Bomb the lab? Gone to WHO?
No.I was under the impression that just mere allegations and hearsay was good enough for 100% proof of guilt.
Well if you read the news stories in the OP, Trump’s State Department made recommendations.
I'm sure SiD will respond but what he said is actually in the OP video. From Fox. Save your rollie face.![]()
“CNN Politiics” and “Washington Post?” Sorry, no thanks.
The OP is Fox.“CNN Politiics” and “Washington Post?” Sorry, no thanks.
They were linking to the actual White House stuff...and as pointed out Fox was in the OP.![]()
“CNN Politiics” and “Washington Post?” Sorry, no thanks.
That’s your opinion.They were linking to the actual White House stuff...and as pointed out Fox was in the OP.
But all of those sources are better than Breitbart...which seems to be acceptable for you to post...so why write off those sources without even discussing?
I watched the video. What were the recommendations to China? What could we have done?KD, @0:50 of the Fox report Chang points out we know that in 2018 the State Department had a tour of the Wuhan facility and found protocol violations.
To the White House, recommendations from State to the administration. 100% that mission returned and provided a report to State. So let's see it.I watched the video. What were the recommendations to China? What could we have done?
Trump did come down on China about unfair trade practices. Could we have trusted a China to fix the issues in Wuhan? They have apparently lied to everyone all along.
We could have had a leader the Chinese didn't clown out. That would have been a start. It's not like the Chinese sweat Trump very much.I watched the video. What were the recommendations to China? What could we have done?
Trump did come down on China about unfair trade practices. Could we have trusted a China to fix the issues in Wuhan? They have apparently lied to everyone all along.
2018....I think that's still close enough on the timeline to blame Obama.KD, @0:50 of the Fox report Chang points out we know that in 2018 the State Department had a tour of the Wuhan facility and found protocol violations.
True. They already had our country outsourced to China during the previous administration. Not a lot of leverage left for Trump to use.We could have had a leader the Chinese didn't clown out. That would have been a start. It's not like the Chinese sweat Trump very much.
No...its supported by links that have been shown many times over.That’s your opinion.
Except the previous administration put pressure on China by entering the TPP...thus attempting to make China more isolated and create leverage against them with trade through other countries. That was ripped up....a trade war started...where the US lost millions (very low end saying that) in trade to the point US business needed to be bailed out. The "phase 1" agreement put us back at square 1 (at best) and after this, do you think phase 2 will really happen and be an improvement? There was plenty of leverage...Trump chose a trade war and chose poorly and it cost the United States thus far.True. They already had our country outsourced to China during the previous administration. Not a lot of leverage left for Trump to use.
Where are those MAGA hats made again?True. They already had our country outsourced to China during the previous administration. Not a lot of leverage left for Trump to use.
There are 268 items for sale on the Trump Organization’s online store. Of those, 41 are made in the USA and listed in a separate section highlighting US goods.
We don't know because the Trump administration has not released all of the memos. Are they hiding something? We don't know at this point. But maybe the probe will provide some clarity. If not, then perhaps a series of ~10 Congressional investigations and dozens of hearings, coordinated with relentless media coverage, could shed some light on the matter.I watched the video. What were the recommendations to China?KD, @0:50 of the Fox report Chang points out we know that in 2018 the State Department had a tour of the Wuhan facility and found protocol violations.
Do you have a link from a reputable source to support your claims?Except the previous administration put pressure on China by entering the TPP...thus attempting to make China more isolated and create leverage against them with trade through other countries. That was ripped up....a trade war started...where the US lost millions (very low end saying that) in trade to the point US business needed to be bailed out. The "phase 1" agreement put us back at square 1 (at best) and after this, do you think phase 2 will really happen and be an improvement? There was plenty of leverage...Trump chose a trade war and chose poorly and it cost the United States thus far.
Which claims would you like sourcing for? Also, before I take my time...what is reputable to you? You seem to refuse to believe NYT or Washington Post are reputable (despite links otherwise) and post Breitbart links as if they are reputable. Not interested in a back and forth if you can't even admit which soruces are reputable.Do you have a link from a reputable source to support your claims?
Also, any trade war is focused on the long haul and not instant gratification stats. Do you have any of that information?
I think less dependence on a country with deplorable human rights records, exploitation of cheap labor, and that has repeatedly stolen our intellectual properties is a good idea. You?
Overall, we rate Foreign Policy Least Biased due to balanced reporting with a very slight lean right and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
CNN doesn’t report news.
Have you watched the Fox report?Important to get to the bottom of this.