gianmarco
Footballguy
I highly doubt Arriola is getting a 3rd start here.My guess is GGG will trot out the same lineup as Jamaica if possible...he knows his ### is on the line and will be afraid to get too experimental.
I highly doubt Arriola is getting a 3rd start here.My guess is GGG will trot out the same lineup as Jamaica if possible...he knows his ### is on the line and will be afraid to get too experimental.
All this coach talk... Panama has looked genuinely organized and consistently giving a ####. I think I heard the Paramount team mention how much the country has taken to the coach- Christensen?- and it's seems likely true for the players. Their play on field shows guys who understand what they're supposed to do, and are set up to compete- not just hold on- against the likes of the US and Mexico (only games I've watched of theirs this cycle), even with far less talent, and are willing to bust their asses to make the extra run and win second balls... something the US seemed incapable of doing on Sunday.
so he's inked in, then.I highly doubt Arriola is getting a 3rd start here.
We know. He sucks.
they look far more organized.which leads one to question the competence of GGG
clearly getting outcoached
Very good points.That and he won two trophies this summer and beat Mexico twice to do it.
Some of you have unrealistic expectations and save the "aim higher" nonsense. Everybody in this thread wants the US to win the WC if we could. I don't think GGG is some managerial savant but the dude has done a lot of stuff right in the position. Getting Musah and Pepi to commit earns him a lot of good will in my book. And you can't just complain away 28-6-6.
All this coach talk... Panama has looked genuinely organized and consistently giving a ####. I think I heard the Paramount team mention how much the country has taken to the coach- Christensen?- and it's seems likely true for the players. Their play on field shows guys who understand what they're supposed to do, and are set up to compete- not just hold on- against the likes of the US and Mexico (only games I've watched of theirs this cycle), even with far less talent, and are willing to bust their asses to make the extra run and win second balls... something the US seemed incapable of doing on Sunday.
Wondering if/when we see Hoppe. Would like to know what the deal is with him and why GGG isn't using him even for a minute after he looked so capable in the GC.
I highly doubt Arriola is getting a 3rd start here.
I agree we are in a good spot but I am not sure I agree we are better off than Canada going into tomorrow's games.Fact is we're still in a good spot. Better than Canada. Better than Panama. Much Better than Costa Rica.
Very good points.
The only thing I would say is all of that is a process that has been built for this moment and for the next cycle. So now it's go time. Put up or shut up time.
And so far I don't see a team that fully understand that the time is NOW. I say this all the time with my kids, especially with my son who runs cross country:
"Time to go. GO GO GO....FINISH THIS THING STRONG!"
It's tme to finish this strong USA.
I don't see how Canada isn't in a better spot than the US right now.Fact is we're still in a good spot. Better than Canada.
Zimm's legs cramped up terribly at the end of the game. They worked on him the whole time they were dealing with Acosta's head and then decided to tell him to just stay up top and hope for the best. To say he ran gingerly in injury time would be an understatement.There were 4 starters from both games: Turner, Zimmerman, Musah, and Arriola.
I agree there's a chance we see Steffen for Turner. I'm fine either way here. I still think Turner played well but he was shakier than his usual self.
CB isn't a spot that is as taxing as the others and, from a fatigue standpoint, Zimmerman should be fine to go. He still looked good last game fitness wise. .
I missed that (honestly I tuned out for much of the end of the game out of frustration). If that's the case, then yeah, I would agree and hope so. I still think, at this point, R&R is our CB pairing of the future. My only hesitation is why GGG seems so hesitant to play Richards. He's played a grand total of 72 minutes in all of 2021 for the USMNT. That doesn't make any sense to me and has gotten to expect he won't play.Zimm's legs cramped up terribly at the end of the game. They worked on him the whole time they were dealing with Acosta's head and then decided to tell him to just stay up top and hope for the best. To say he ran gingerly in injury time would be an understatement.
I think there is a chance he sits against CR and we may get the Robinson, Richards pairing.
I think Canada and Panama are the 3rd and 4th best teams in CONCACAF this time around. I'd prefer to see them tie both games they play as that steals 2 potential points from those games that won't then be in the equation.I can't figure out what result we want from the Canada Panama match tomorrow. I could make an argument for any of the three results.
Canada hasn't gotten 3 points on the road yet and have also dropped points at home to a team that appears to be near the bottom of the group. Again, let's see if they get three at home to Panama.I don't see how Canada isn't in a better spot than the US right now.
Away- huge draws against the hardest opponents in US and Mex, and disappointing draw vs Hon (still a point and not a lost)
Home- win vs El Sal and disappointing draw vs Hon.
While they've had a couple of disappointments not winning against lesser opponents, they are still adding points every game and have 2 in hand away where 0 was expected.
The US has dropped points at home and away in games that should have been won.
As of the day before ELS, they were in negotiations with GGG on a huge contract extension and rightfully so based on the past year of results he had gotten. Pretty hard to reverse course so quickly because of one poor game.But as you noted, he has put us in a position that we may need a result at Costa Rica. Further, shouldn't McBride and Earnie have been preparing for this as soon as El Salvador?
As of the day before ELS, they were in negotiations with GGG on a huge contract extension and rightfully so based on the past year of results he had gotten. Pretty hard to reverse course so quickly because of one poor game.
I get that the Uly thing was disappointing, but the difference here is that they'd probably need to spend a significant transfer fee to land Pepi, so they'd be unlikely to just cut him loose.I don't like this... https://twitter.com/CJSmith91/status/1447983392985915392?s=20
Sources tell me Ricardo Pepi's camp are in agreement on personal terms with Wolfsburg & are looking to close a deal with #DTID #USMNT Haven't been able to reach his agent to confirm yet
I'm not sure who that source is though. Not sure i'd want Pepi at Wolfsburg with their recent history with US players.
I looked this up the other day too. The two regional powerhouses -- by far the best two teams in the federation -- are 16-23-21 all time on the road in the most important competition.The US's road record in the Hexagonal is 8-11-11 all time. Mexico's is 8-12-10.
agree to disagree.Canada hasn't gotten 3 points on the road yet and have also dropped points at home to a team that appears to be near the bottom of the group. Again, let's see if they get three at home to Panama.
At the very least, the US is in no worse shape than Canada. Right now, Canada is in a playoff and the US qualifies.
from the eye test... waaaaaay more than one poor game.one poor game.
True... but didn't they have issues with Kobe Hernandez too? Sure, Pepi is a better prospect than both of those guys, but it still gives me pause for sure. Hopefully, he's getting good advice from people he trusts that tells him Wolfsburg is a good fit.I get that the Uly thing was disappointing, but the difference here is that they'd probably need to spend a significant transfer fee to land Pepi, so they'd be unlikely to just cut him loose.
You don't think San Pedro Sula is a road game of consequence? Canada has to go there knowing they couldn't beat that team at home.agree to disagree.
US has lost its only road game of consequence... Canada tied both of the games they should be expected to lose and haven't lost any yet. The US has yet to play Canada, CR or Mex away... all games that a point would look great from.
and more telling- they are playing cohesively and to their strengths... arguably the better team against both the US and Mex away. And they did this to the US without Davies for most of the game.
Just to be clear I am laughing with you on this one. SheeshHe's 28-6-6, guys.
I suspect that may signal more of an issue between Wolfsburg and the Kleiban brothers than necessarily an issue with US players.True... but didn't they have issues with Kobe Hernandez too? Sure, Pepi is a better prospect than both of those guys, but it still gives me pause for sure. Hopefully, he's getting good advice from people he trusts that tells him Wolfsburg is a good fit.
There are some usually pretty clear headed guys on USMNT Twitter freaking out too. I get it. It hasn't always been a pretty 28-6-6. I just disagree with Watke that it wouldn't matter if we replaced Gregg now because "he hasn't built anything anyway." I think that's clearly wrong. At the very least, he's built a system that limits chances. And that probably stands us in good stead for the rest of those away qualifiers.Moe. said:Just to be clear I am laughing with you on this one. Sheesh
There are some usually pretty clear headed guys on USMNT Twitter freaking out too. I get it. It hasn't always been a pretty 28-6-6. I just disagree with Watke that it wouldn't matter if we replaced Gregg now because "he hasn't built anything anyway." I think that's clearly wrong. At the very least, he's built a system that limits chances. And that probably stands us in good stead for the rest of those away qualifiers.
This is where I am too.Ramsay Hunt Experience said:Here are the players I'm reasonably certain will start:
Pepi
Aaronson
Adams
M. Robinson
Dest
If healthy, you add Swag and Jedi to that list.
Because McKenzie didn't cover himself in glory, I'd imagine we get Richards if Zimm seems to have load issues. If Swag starts, I think the impulse would be to just stay with Musah as that MF 3 has worked well. But LDT wouldn't shock me.
If Jedi can't go, I imagine you see Dest on the left and Yedlin or Moore on the right. Maybe Moore as I think he was the least of the problems on Sunday and Yedlin didn't exactly light it up off the bench.
Turner/Steffen is a complete toss-up for me. Turner's yips weren't that big a problem for me, because no matter how much we say Steffen is good with his feet, he tends to make one of those boners every game too. I did think Turner showed some vulnerability on commanding his area on those corners. But I also think Turner is, and always will be, a better shot stopper than Steffen. He just moves his feet better. I'd feel less vulnerable to a Couva-esque thunderbastard with Turner in goal. For as epic a shot as that was for T&T, the fact is that Tim Howard's feet were in cement for that shot. Turner showed against Jamaica that he could get his feet right and get over to cover a similarly epic blast (that nevertheless missed the target, but Turner had it covered).
International soccer is bonkers, so I’m not going to say unprecedented, but it would be pretty weird to replace a dude in that situation.Looking ahead..
Let's say we qualify but GGG continues to have the same issues that most agree with(player selection, leadership, tactics etc.)
Would you you replace him after we've qualified?
Is he the single best available manager to get us into the knockout rounds in Qatar?
It's weird how little credit the team gets for this. They've been superb defensively for a long stretch now.At the very least, he's built a system that limits chances.
Sure, now.... However, coming into that ELS game he was coming off on hell of a summer. Not only did we beat Mexico twice and win two trophies, but outplayed Mexico with what any neutral would admit was an inferior squad the second time around to do it. Tough to start planning for a new coach after one bad loss, a disappointing tie, and an ugly win after that summer.El Floppo said:from the eye test... waaaaaay more than one poor game.
but the results have flattered him and this team, so agree- tough to can him.
If we qualify and we are healthy, our lineup is going to pick itself moreso than it has in the past. And this will limit one of Gregg's perceived weaknesses.Looking ahead..
Let's say we qualify but GGG continues to have the same issues that most agree with(player selection, leadership, tactics etc.)
Would you you replace him after we've qualified?
Is he the single best available manager to get us into the knockout rounds in Qatar?
I pretty much agree with this.TripItUp said:But as you noted, he has put us in a position that we may need a result at Costa Rica. Further, shouldn't McBride and Earnie have been preparing for this as soon as El Salvador?
This is where I am too.
I think the biggest question for me is who he puts at RW. It can't/shouldn't be Arriola to start. Fine with him coming in later.
I think it will be Weah. I checked and he has played about half his games on the right side and it's his club position as well.
Aaronson Pepi Weah
Musah Adams McKennie
Robinson Robinson Richards Dest
Turner
Subs: LDLT for McKennie, Roldan for Weah, Moore for Dest (or Robinson and slide Dest over), Zardes for Pepi, last TBD
TripItUp said:To me the only question is, why should GGG keep his job even with an expected result at home?
AAABatteries said:That and he won two trophies this summer and beat Mexico twice to do it.
Some of you have unrealistic expectations and save the "aim higher" nonsense. Everybody in this thread wants the US to win the WC if we could. I don't think GGG is some managerial savant but the dude has done a lot of stuff right in the position. Getting Musah and Pepi to commit earns him a lot of good will in my book. And you can't just complain away 28-6-6.
What are we gaining? Hopefully beyond better lineup selection, you get a coach that can motivate the players to play. Hello? You play to win the game. GGG did not play to win the last game. Plain and simple. And maybe the players saw that and decided not to try. I don't know. No idea. None of us can be in their heads. But when you see basically an entire team lay down and quit from the start, you have to wonder about the coach.If we qualify and we are healthy, our lineup is going to pick itself moreso than it has in the past. And this will limit one of Gregg's perceived weaknesses.
So, in that case, what are you gaining? Are we going to bring in some tactical savant that is going to steamroll us into the knockout rounds? Or are we better off with someone who has coached our guys for a couple years?
Oh, and if we are NOT healthy come 2022... then it's sort of irrelevant. Let Gregg coach and see how he does and make a decision afterwards with 2026 in mind.