wade over chandler was really a terrible decision. I love Wade's game. He goes to the hole like a freight train. But he's banged up, rusty and not that suited for international ball. He doesnt bring anthing unique to the team. He doesnt shoot well. Making him the 6th man by default could hurt in a big game. Losing Howard without a replacement would kill our chances.
This is an excellent point.
How much will Coach K feel compelled to play Wade? I suppose he won't play at the expense of James, since James will be playing PF plenty.But it seems he will necessarily take minutes from Kobe, Anthony, Redd, Prince, or even Williams, since without Wade Williams may have played on the floor at times with another PG... Prince and Redd are on the team to fill specific roles, which doesn't make sense if they are going to give up minutes to Wade, who doesn't fill those same roles... and it seems obvious that it would be better to have Kobe, Anthony, and even Williams get more minutes.
None of this would have been an issue if they took Chandler instead, and they would have the benefit of another big who can defend and rebound in case the team needs it at some point, whether due to injury or foul trouble. On top of that, Chandler actually played last summer, and played well. He only got 8.6 mpg, but was second on the team in blocks and 5th in rebounding, and shot 56%.
The more I think about this, the less sense it makes to take Wade.