What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vanderbilt pediatric transgender clinic nukes website after Matt Walsh exposes “ big money maker” motive (1 Viewer)

pinkham13

Footballguy

it was never about children’s health or well being. It was always about getting rich or die trying. Mutilating children for money. More far left Marxist lies peddled as “science”
 

it was never about children’s health or well being. It was always about getting rich or die trying. Mutilating children for money. More far left Marxist lies peddled as “science”

The Clinics are motivated by money. The institutions have been overtaken by far far far left-wing activists and are motivated by an extreme ideology. How do you know when something is evil:

1. They operate in darkness. Vanderbilt has since taken down their entire gender website since it was used to expose their agenda and practices.
2. They suppress all criticism. Tik-Tok, Google, Twitter, and even PayPal have been banning accounts which criticize these barbaric practice of mutilating children. Vanderbilt has threatened to terminate any doctors who do not go along with butchering of children for no medical reason.


These bottom and top surgeries can generate upwards of $100K per patient, plus generate a life-time customer who must continually return to try to stay healthy after destroying their bodies. Even those on hormones generate many thousands of dollars per year because of all the visits and lab work it requires. They are pushing this crap on children as young as 13 at Vanderbilt.

Places like UK and Sweden have finally started to shed some light on these absolutely evil practices and doing actually research and studies and blowing the lies that US institutions are telling out of the water. They are coming up with new standards which will stop these gender-affirming voodoo that goes on in US Clinics today. Supporting these gender identity so-called healthcare is not compassionate, it is supporting evil. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON THESE LIES. STOP DROWNING IN YOUR OWN BIGOTRY AGAINST CONSERVATIVES.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
You're contending that an atheist is incapable of having a moral compass?
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff

I don't believe that is true and could probably find a link to verify it if I wished to spend the time. I happen to be agnostic, but atheists and agnostics are a distinct minority in liberal circles from my experience.

Evil is a supernatural concept. There are people who act evil and do evil things but evil does not exist as a force by itself IMO.

No, those of us who believe in evolution don't think we evolved from apes, we evolved from a common ancestor of apes.

Fun Fact:

Buddhists don't believe in a personal god but they do have a moral compass similar to those who believe in Christianity.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
I dont believe in god.

I learned the facts of life from watching the facts of life*








*yes, i know its from cable guy.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
This is pure garbage. The belief you can only be a good moral person if you believe in god is atrocious and extremely condescending.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
 
@jon_mx ...

I have serious misgivings about allowing children to use puberty blockers, take hormones, and to undergo a major surgery to transition genders. My misgivings all stem from the fact that children are inexperienced and are much more likely to make a choice they later regret than an adult. I have zero misgivings about allowing adults to make these choices.

I can't ever take your side in these discussions because you of how you come off. Everything is hyperbole. You are also incredibly entrenched to the point it just seems like reasonable discussion on the topic with you is impossible. I honestly don't know why you bother posting about this stuff, because you're alienating even the people likely to agree with you about parts of this issue.
 
Let's look at the general numbers and see the games these butchers are playing.

Before 2000;
Gender Dysphoria: 0.04% of the population, with about 70-90 percent of those growing out of it through adolescences with no medical transitioning.
Transgender Suicide Rates: 60 per 100K
Male Suicide Rates: 22 per 100K
Female Suicide Rates: 5.5 per 100K

Now:
Gender Dysphoria: 2% of the population, with 90 plus percent being medically transitioned.
Transgender Suicide Rates: 42 per 100K (best case assumption)
Male Suicide Rates: 22 per 100K
Female Suicide Rates: 5.5 per 100K

So what we are doing is pushing a much larger percentage of children into the Gender Dysphoria camp and destroying the development of their natural reproductive organs Let's say we believe their dubious data and they have reduced the suicide rates in Transgendered by 20-30 percent. Have they really saved lives? Absolutely not, what they are doing is taking mostly from the lowest category of suicide rates, females, convincing them they suffer from 'gender dysphoria' and then claiming they reduced their suicide rate from 60 down to 42 per 100,000. What they actually did was take girls with a suicide rate 5.5 and increased to 42, which is nearly an 8-fold increase. That is why you need real controlled clinical trials. These left-wing loons are playing games with the numbers.
 
Last edited:
@jon_mx ...

I have serious misgivings about allowing children to use puberty blockers, take hormones, and to undergo a major surgery to transition genders. My misgivings all stem from the fact that children are inexperienced and are much more likely to make a choice they later regret than an adult. I have zero misgivings about allowing adults to make these choices.

I can't ever take your side in these discussions because you of how you come off. Everything is hyperbole. You are also incredibly entrenched to the point it just seems like reasonable discussion on the topic with you is impossible. I honestly don't know why you bother posting about this stuff, because you're alienating even the people likely to agree with you about parts of this issue.

There is nothing hyperbolic about what I am saying. Not a thing. These medical procedures are not helping children, but they are clearly destroying their future. I don't have an issue with adults. But these adolescents going through puberty are in the most vulnerable state and are heavily influenceable by peer pressure and are not mature enough to make such permanent decisions on destroying their bodies and unnecessarily creating a lifetime of medical headaches. You are mistaking care with hyperbole. It is not.
 
@jon_mx ...

I have serious misgivings about allowing children to use puberty blockers, take hormones, and to undergo a major surgery to transition genders. My misgivings all stem from the fact that children are inexperienced and are much more likely to make a choice they later regret than an adult. I have zero misgivings about allowing adults to make these choices.

I can't ever take your side in these discussions because you of how you come off. Everything is hyperbole. You are also incredibly entrenched to the point it just seems like reasonable discussion on the topic with you is impossible. I honestly don't know why you bother posting about this stuff, because you're alienating even the people likely to agree with you about parts of this issue.
Thanks for this post. I have the exact same misgivings you do, BTW. I just don’t want the state involved. Parents are another matter.
 
I don't have an issue with adults. But these adolescents going through puberty are in the most vulnerable state and are heavily influenceable by peer pressure and are not mature enough to make such permanent decisions on destroying their bodies and unnecessarily creating a lifetime of medical headaches.
I tend to agree with a good portion of this.

What I'm trying to get my head around is the cases where a kid, even before becoming school-aged, goes to their parents and says something to the effect of "I'm a boy. I know I am" when they were born as a female. This happened to a family we know. There wasn't any peer-pressure, or contact with school influences, or anything other than the kid just "knew" it. He must have been 3 or 4 years old? (I don't know every single detail obviously) It was a unique occurrence for me, I naively had never even heard of that.

So when that happens, I'm torn on the hormones and body stuff. Part of me thinks that people need to attain adulthood to make these decisions (a lot of kids are still dumb even at 18 but that's another story), but part of me thinks it must be horribly cruel to go through the first 18 years of life as the "wrong" gender.

To address the political part of this though, is why is this even a government thing, or a politics thing? This family I'm referring to above, it seems to me the last thing they would have needed is some government ******** getting involved in their lives and decisions over this. Like, I get it, you're against this stuff. I'm not sure where I fall, as stated previously. What I am sure of is it's not up to me, and I would say it's not up to you, to decide for other people. That's the main point on politics/government, to me. The government largely needs to stay out of other people's business when it comes to their personal lives, IMO.

Also I'm interested in discussion on this, but just in advance if someone responds with a "whataboutism" I probably won't address that type of discussion.
 
I don't have an issue with adults. But these adolescents going through puberty are in the most vulnerable state and are heavily influenceable by peer pressure and are not mature enough to make such permanent decisions on destroying their bodies and unnecessarily creating a lifetime of medical headaches.
I tend to agree with a good portion of this.

What I'm trying to get my head around is the cases where a kid, even before becoming school-aged, goes to their parents and says something to the effect of "I'm a boy. I know I am" when they were born as a female. This happened to a family we know. There wasn't any peer-pressure, or contact with school influences, or anything other than the kid just "knew" it. He must have been 3 or 4 years old? (I don't know every single detail obviously) It was a unique occurrence for me, I naively had never even heard of that.

So when that happens, I'm torn on the hormones and body stuff. Part of me thinks that people need to attain adulthood to make these decisions (a lot of kids are still dumb even at 18 but that's another story), but part of me thinks it must be horribly cruel to go through the first 18 years of life as the "wrong" gender.

To address the political part of this though, is why is this even a government thing, or a politics thing? This family I'm referring to above, it seems to me the last thing they would have needed is some government ******** getting involved in their lives and decisions over this. Like, I get it, you're against this stuff. I'm not sure where I fall, as stated previously. What I am sure of is it's not up to me, and I would say it's not up to you, to decide for other people. That's the main point on politics/government, to me. The government largely needs to stay out of other people's business when it comes to their personal lives, IMO.

Also I'm interested in discussion on this, but just in advance if someone responds with a "whataboutism" I probably won't address that type of discussion.

See that is the 0.04 percent of the population who were treated 20 years ago by psychologist who did actual diagnosis of their condition. But that is not what 98% of the current children being medically treated for gender dysphoria actually have. It is medically insane to rubber stamp self-diagnosis of children, but that is exactly the standard that is being practiced today.

And part of what also makes this political is the language in the affordable care act arguably forces insurance companies to cover these treatments even-though they are largely elective and it is not life-threatening condition. The money pouring in from insurance is a big incentive for these clinics to perform these surgeries and treatments.
 
Last edited:
See that is the 0.04 percent of the population who were treated 20 years ago by phycologists who did actual diagnosis of their condition. Bug that is not what 98% of the current children being medically treated for gender dysphoria actually have. It is medically insane to rubber stamp self-diagnosis of children, but that is exactly the standard that is being practiced today.
That percentage makes sense to me. Without having done much research admittedly, I always assumed or somehow else inferred that this type of case must be extremely, extremely rare. I could see how the raw numbers may be increasing as more awareness and acceptance of this is recognized, but generally speaking the percentages shouldn't be increasing that much because the denominator in this equation is a huge number. That's just math.

I'll use a crude example. Let's say 20 years ago, 3,000 kids in a state that has 20 million residents were properly diagnosed with this condition. If 20 years later, 4,500 kids were diagnosed, that would be a 50% increase in the raw numbers, but as an overall percentage that increase would be barely noticeable because of the large denominator.

What raises a red flag for me is the age of the kid. You pointed out the influence of peer pressure, etc. I understand that concern. What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way. So I think we probably agree that a kid shouldn't be making big medical decisions in a case like that.

I'm still against the government getting involved.

I'll add that for-profit medicine, including doing these types of treatments, is an anathema on our country. I certainly oppose the for-profit motives of these medical institutions. Shame on them if they are overstepping medicine for profit in these cases, but also in every other aspect of medicine and procedures. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking it's only these procedures where profit motive is coming into play.
 
See that is the 0.04 percent of the population who were treated 20 years ago by phycologists who did actual diagnosis of their condition. Bug that is not what 98% of the current children being medically treated for gender dysphoria actually have. It is medically insane to rubber stamp self-diagnosis of children, but that is exactly the standard that is being practiced today.
That percentage makes sense to me. Without having done much research admittedly, I always assumed or somehow else inferred that this type of case must be extremely, extremely rare. I could see how the raw numbers may be increasing as more awareness and acceptance of this is recognized, but generally speaking the percentages shouldn't be increasing that much because the denominator in this equation is a huge number. That's just math.

I'll use a crude example. Let's say 20 years ago, 3,000 kids in a state that has 20 million residents were properly diagnosed with this condition. If 20 years later, 4,500 kids were diagnosed, that would be a 50% increase in the raw numbers, but as an overall percentage that increase would be barely noticeable because of the large denominator.

What raises a red flag for me is the age of the kid. You pointed out the influence of peer pressure, etc. I understand that concern. What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way. So I think we probably agree that a kid shouldn't be making big medical decisions in a case like that.

I'm still against the government getting involved.

I'll add that for-profit medicine, including doing these types of treatments, is an anathema on our country. I certainly oppose the for-profit motives of these medical institutions. Shame on them if they are overstepping medicine for profit in these cases, but also in every other aspect of medicine and procedures. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking it's only these procedures where profit motive is coming into play.

When the medical community becomes more responsible and bases treatments on legitimate medical diagnosis which evaluates the patients for all kinds of conditions and rules out other problems, then the government should get out. This is happening in the UK and Sweden, who were initially at the forefront of this gender identity movement. They are backtracking in a major way and creating more responsible medical standards for diagnosis and treatments. The US and Canada are still under the control of these extremists and any medical profession who disagrees with the current standards is subject to medical ma[practice and will lose his job, and in the case of Canada faces up to 5 years in prison.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
Your statements in that thread indicate that you don’t know much about African American history since you seem to have accepted the revisionist right wing talk show version of it. But I could be wrong about this.
 
Related:


According to Josh Hawley, more than ONE gender is a socialist lie.

There are some many problems with that statement, and I want to focus on the less obvious. Socialism has absolutely nothing to do with gender politics. The intent of this email is 100% to rile up the recipient enough that they'll open up their wallet and give $ to Hawley. We need leaders that aren't going to stoop to this kind of behavior.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
Your statements in that thread indicate that you don’t know much about African American history since you seem to have accepted the revisionist right wing talk show version of it. But I could be wrong about this.
Do you notice that you very often say this? You say something dumb and then you say you could be wrong or admit you’re wrong again and again and again.

You’re always wrong, Timothy.

ETA - Life lesson: If it’s always somebody else, ITS YOU.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
Your statements in that thread indicate that you don’t know much about African American history since you seem to have accepted the revisionist right wing talk show version of it. But I could be wrong about this.
Do you notice that you very often say this? You say something dumb and then you say you could be wrong or admit you’re wrong again and again and again.

You’re always wrong, Timothy.
I’m often wrong. Not so much on black history though.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
This is pure garbage. The belief you can only be a good moral person if you believe in god is atrocious and extremely condescending.
Not to mention thousands of years of evidence of believers committing atrocities across the globe in the name of their chosen god(s).
 
What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way.
This scenario is actually very common and is not a good indicator that it’s just a phase. For a lot of trans people, it’s their reaction to the physical changes of puberty that causes them to question their gender for the first time.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
This is pure garbage. The belief you can only be a good moral person if you believe in god is atrocious and extremely condescending.
Not to mention thousands of years of evidence of believers committing atrocities across the globe in the name of their chosen god(s).

Uhm, yeah, sure. Also, all in the name of their chosen political ideology too.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
Your statements in that thread indicate that you don’t know much about African American history since you seem to have accepted the revisionist right wing talk show version of it. But I could be wrong about this.
Do you notice that you very often say this? You say something dumb and then you say you could be wrong or admit you’re wrong again and again and again.

You’re always wrong, Timothy.
I’m often wrong. Not so much on black history though.

Yes you are. Incredibly so, too.
 
This scenario is actually very common and is not a good indicator that it’s just a phase. For a lot of trans people, it’s their reaction to the physical changes of puberty that causes them to question their gender for the first time.
Thanks, hopefully my ignorance isn’t offensive. I’m still learning about this topic.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
This is pure garbage. The belief you can only be a good moral person if you believe in god is atrocious and extremely condescending.
Not to mention thousands of years of evidence of believers committing atrocities across the globe in the name of their chosen god(s).

Uhm, yeah, sure. Also, all in the name of their chosen political ideology too.
Sure. But that’s not the accusation made here. According to Pink if you don’t believe in God you have “no basis in morality to stand upon”. Politics have nothing to do with that statement.
 
So the right wing state of Tennessee is apparently going to use this social media Matt Walsh nonsense to bully Vanderbilt into dropping its program. The American Medical Association has asked these states not to do this , as once again you’ve got ignorant politicians trying to interfere with private and personal health decisions:


This is the other reason, after abortion, that I came out in support of Elevated Access yesterday: so that when these states ban these procedures out of fear and misinformation, at least a few of these poor kids can fly elsewhere to those of us still living in the 21st century.

And by nonsense, you mean videos that Vanderbilt posted on their website? So what you call 'nonsense' means facts that Vanderbilt was inadvertently sharing with the public until yesterday when they took down their website?

Before butchering children and destroying any hope they have of ever having a real sex life (you know, with actual orgasms) and being able to reproduce, should there not be complete transparency of these institutions. Should we not have access to:

1. How many kids they are treating and what type of treatments they are given.
2. Real medical research with controlled clinical trails establishing the benefits of such procedures and treatments.
3. Details of the risks and long-term consequences of such treatments, instead of outright lies such as these treatments are completely reversible.
4. The process of how these children are diagnosis with gender dysphoria and if other possible conditions such as depression or ADHD or autism have been eliminated
5. How much money they are making on these children

That is what I am demanding and you should be too. But instead you are driven by your absolute hatred of everything rightwing and your irrational trust in these far-left gender ideological loons who have taken over major university departments and are spreading absolute lies. You are not moved by the fact that gender dysphoria has somehow skyrocketed over the last decade to the tune of about 50X in adolescence girls. We are just suppose keep chopping off healthy breasts, removing their uteruses, removing large portions of their arms to create some odd appendage that is suppose to represent a penis without any facts or data to support such insane procedures.

You are getting emotionally spun up on this based on total lies about how wonderful these treatments are. Sorry to tell you, but far more enlightened societies who are far more liberal than the US in both the UK and Sweden have discovered what huge lies these are and are shutting down these butcher centers and are tossing out these asinine 'medical' standards and are created new methods and guidelines to evaluate and treat children which address the questions I have raised above, I would think you would favor that instead of trafficking kids to other states to get destroyed.
You accuse me in this post of “absolute hatred of everything right wing”, “irrational trust” and getting “emotionally spun up”. And in the exact same post you use phrases like “butchering children”, “gender ideological loons”, “chopping off healthy breasts” etc.

I suggest you may be projecting here.

I have researched this issue far far far far far more than you have. The difference between you and me, I laid out arguments and facts to support my position. You offer nothing but emotions.
It’s par for the course. Earlier in another thread he accuse me of not knowing history. I majored in history. After women, it’s my favorite subject.
Your statements in that thread indicate that you don’t know much about African American history since you seem to have accepted the revisionist right wing talk show version of it. But I could be wrong about this.
Do you notice that you very often say this? You say something dumb and then you say you could be wrong or admit you’re wrong again and again and again.

You’re always wrong, Timothy.
I’m often wrong. Not so much on black history though.

I don’t want to get accused of just using the laughing emoji as a response without responding so h
What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way.
This scenario is actually very common and is not a good indicator that it’s just a phase. For a lot of trans people, it’s their reaction to the physical changes of puberty that causes them to question their gender for the first time.
No ****, they go through hormone changes. Both of my girls lost their ****ing minds. Then the hormone settle in and then go back to “normal.”

Or are you **** them up further by giving them hormone treatments and eventually mutilate them.
 
What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way.
This scenario is actually very common and is not a good indicator that it’s just a phase. For a lot of trans people, it’s their reaction to the physical changes of puberty that causes them to question their gender for the first time.

No ****, they go through hormone changes. Both of my girls lost their ****ing minds. Then the hormone settle in and then go back to “normal.”

Or you **** them up further by giving them hormone treatments.
 
Last edited:
Nothing I hate more than Marxists who are only interested in making money

You must really hate Bernie and his 3 houses...
I wouldn't say I hate him, but he's always left me cold. Then again, that has zero to do with how many houses he owns

Sorry I must have read your post wrong about making money.
It was a joke about the OP draining the word "Marxist" of all meaning by using it against people he claimed were only interested in making money
 
See that is the 0.04 percent of the population who were treated 20 years ago by phycologists who did actual diagnosis of their condition. Bug that is not what 98% of the current children being medically treated for gender dysphoria actually have. It is medically insane to rubber stamp self-diagnosis of children, but that is exactly the standard that is being practiced today.
That percentage makes sense to me. Without having done much research admittedly, I always assumed or somehow else inferred that this type of case must be extremely, extremely rare. I could see how the raw numbers may be increasing as more awareness and acceptance of this is recognized, but generally speaking the percentages shouldn't be increasing that much because the denominator in this equation is a huge number. That's just math.

I'll use a crude example. Let's say 20 years ago, 3,000 kids in a state that has 20 million residents were properly diagnosed with this condition. If 20 years later, 4,500 kids were diagnosed, that would be a 50% increase in the raw numbers, but as an overall percentage that increase would be barely noticeable because of the large denominator.

What raises a red flag for me is the age of the kid. You pointed out the influence of peer pressure, etc. I understand that concern. What seems off to me is if a kid goes though the first 10 years of life let's say, and never mentions an issue once. Then one day, comes home and says something? That would seem fishy to me, like in a "where did you get that from?" kind of way. So I think we probably agree that a kid shouldn't be making big medical decisions in a case like that.

I'm still against the government getting involved.

I'll add that for-profit medicine, including doing these types of treatments, is an anathema on our country. I certainly oppose the for-profit motives of these medical institutions. Shame on them if they are overstepping medicine for profit in these cases, but also in every other aspect of medicine and procedures. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking it's only these procedures where profit motive is coming into play.
This is a thoughtful post. I'd like to say I agree about government not getting involved, but I'm not sure I do. In principal, I'd like to think we never should have government involved in how parents raise their kids, but of course in practice there are some things we simply have to regulate to protect kids from those outlier parents who are just too extreme in their beliefs. As an example, I think most of us would agree, as Americans, that we shouldn't allow the genital mutilation that hundreds of millions of African girls have undergone over the past decades. The people/parents who allow this to happen in Africa obviously think differently.
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
You're contending that an atheist is incapable of having a moral compass?
I wrote that people who believe that they were animals who evolved from apes to humans are subscribing to Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest. Basically the law of the jungle. It’s also what Mao believed as he said power comes from the barrel of a gun. These are the ways of Godless Marxists. Our schools are chock full of teachers with these beliefs. No wonder home schooling is booming. Why would anyone send kids to these thought prisons. Where truth is what you say it is. Be your own God and decide your own truth. So you ask me if non believers can have morals? I ask you what would you base them on? You shall know them by their fruits. And the fruits of this mad science is proof that the law of the jungle is indeed how many are living. There is nothing moral or upstanding about mutilating children because you can get rich running a business off them. If that’s your morals then I think you answered your own question
 
The majority if not all of the far left don’t believe in God. How would they recognize evil when they have no basis in morality to stand upon? They believe they are just animals evolved from apes. So thy live by the law of the jungle. Only the strong survive. Get rich anyway you can because truth is whatever you decide it is. The material world is all that exists to them. Science and stuff
You're contending that an atheist is incapable of having a moral compass?
I wrote that people who believe that they were animals who evolved from apes to humans are subscribing to Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest. Basically the law of the jungle. It’s also what Mao believed as he said power comes from the barrel of a gun. These are the ways of Godless Marxists. Our schools are chock full of teachers with these beliefs. No wonder home schooling is booming. Why would anyone send kids to these thought prisons. Where truth is what you say it is. Be your own God and decide your own truth. So you ask me if non believers can have morals? I ask you what would you base them on? You shall know them by their fruits. And the fruits of this mad science is proof that the law of the jungle is indeed how many are living. There is nothing moral or upstanding about mutilating children because you can get rich running a business off them. If that’s your morals then I think you answered your own question
As an atheist, I assure you I can tell good from bad, probably more effectively than you can because I don't need to use a book as a cheat sheet. Also, I find your post incredibly offensive to me personally.
 
So you ask me if non believers can have morals? I ask you what would you base them on?
This is an interesting question. An atheist would tell you that both theists and atheists base their morals on the same thing. Atheists believe that God is a human construct therefore morals are as well. Interestingly, other animals (if humans are just animals) also have morals and beliefs. For example, elephants also have death rituals similar to humans.
 
As an atheist, I assure you I can tell good from bad, probably more effectively than you can because I don't need to use a book as a cheat sheet. Also, I find your post incredibly offensive to me personally.
While I’m a firm believer in the right to believe whatever one wants too, I will never understand the righteous indignation some have who believe in the unprovable. The condensation and contemptuous judgement is unreal.
 
As an atheist, I assure you I can tell good from bad, probably more effectively than you can because I don't need to use a book as a cheat sheet. Also, I find your post incredibly offensive to me personally.
While I’m a firm believer in the right to believe whatever one wants too, I will never understand the righteous indignation some have who believe in the unprovable. The condensation and contemptuous judgement is unreal.
It is very much the same as those obsessed with the Jan 6th committee.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top