VBD and DD Projections Error (1 Viewer)

[David Dodds]

To make a long story short, we loaded the wrong Minnesota projections into the VBD last night. This then had a ripple effect which loaded the wrong projections into the Draft Dominator software.

I have uploaded a new version of the VBD App. (Version P) that corrects these values.

Bruce will release a new version of the Draft Dominator tonight, but there is an easy fix. From the Fil Menu, Choose Get New Projections. This always ensures that your Draft Dominator is drafting with the most updated site stats.

Sorry for the problems here.

 

[_4_]

Thanks for the heads up.

I paid for a subscription last night and set up DD. WOW. What a great tool! If you don't have it - grab your credit card and sign up...

Great work guys!

 

[Wingnut]

Will the new version also update the teams for Duckett and Lelie?? Im too lazy to delete them and add them back in with their new teams

 

[_4_]

Will the new version also update the teams for Duckett and Lelie?? Im too lazy to delete them and add them back in with their new teams

I know the update from last night to this morning moved Duckett up a couple spots (not very far) - it was the first thing I checked after updating this morning. Just wanted to see how much "play" there was in the update.

 

[Urinal Mint]

I was wondering why Garo Yepremian was topping my QB rankings.

 

[mvp2112]

To make a long story short, we loaded the wrong Minnesota projections into the VBD last night. This then had a ripple effect which loaded the wrong projections into the Draft Dominator software.I have uploaded a new version of the VBD App. (Version P) that corrects these values.Bruce will release a new version of the Draft Dominator tonight, but there is an easy fix. From the Fil Menu, Choose Get New Projections. This always ensures that your Draft Dominator is drafting with the most updated site stats.Sorry for the problems here.

I have just performed the update as suggested above, and now it seems all the defenses are not in DD anymore. Anyone else seen this?Perhaps the new version of DD that will be released this evening will fix this.

 

[Robbie Cooper]

I just updated the projection and am using DD vG --- my Defenses are all loaded.

My concern/question: how are both Denver RBs (Bell & Bell) both projected higher than Warrick Dunn (and numerous other undisputed starters)?

Do you really expect both Bells to outperform Dunn?

 

[_4_]

I just updated the projection and am using DD vG --- my Defenses are all loaded.

My concern/question: how are both Denver RBs (Bell & Bell) both projected higher than Warrick Dunn (and numerous other undisputed starters)?

Do you really expect both Bells to outperform Dunn?

Haven't seen/noticed that yet.....good question.

 

[Doug Drinen]

My concern/question: how are both Denver RBs (Bell & Bell) both projected higher than Warrick Dunn (and numerous other undisputed starters)?

On the team projections pages, it shows the total RB production for each team, right next to the total RB production for the same team during the past two years. Here is Denver's. On that page, you can see that the current projections have Denver's RBs actually producing quite a bit less than they did last year, and less than 2004 as well. Now, you may or may not agree with that, but the nice thing is that you can see that the projections aren't out of line with what Denver has produced in the past.

If anything, they might be a little conservative. In fact, both Mike Bell's and Tatum Bell's projected numbers are currently lower than both Mike Anderson's and Tatum Bell's actual numbers from last year.

 

[joffer]

My concern/question: how are both Denver RBs (Bell & Bell) both projected higher than Warrick Dunn (and numerous other undisputed starters)?

Do you really expect both Bells to outperform Dunn?

where are you seeing that?

 

[Juicecore]

I'm having another problem with the DD ... When I look at the projections through the setup menu where u can edit them the point totals are different then when u are on the main screen looking at guys total points.

ie. setup page i have LT projected to score 368 points... But when I close this and just look at the main page listings it shows LT at 345.4 points...

Any way to fix this?

 

[SDJohnny]

I'm having another problem with the DD ... When I look at the projections through the setup menu where u can edit them the point totals are different then when u are on the main screen looking at guys total points. ie. setup page i have LT projected to score 368 points... But when I close this and just look at the main page listings it shows LT at 345.4 points...Any way to fix this?

By main page do you mean the player pool?If you set it up to end your season in week 16 the point total will be less b/c of no week 17

 

[joffer]

I'm having another problem with the DD ... When I look at the projections through the setup menu where u can edit them the point totals are different then when u are on the main screen looking at guys total points.

ie. setup page i have LT projected to score 368 points... But when I close this and just look at the main page listings it shows LT at 345.4 points...

Any way to fix this?

go to the Game by Game window and uncheck the Use Strength of Schedule and Use Weekly Weights boxesthere's more info over in the Applications forum

 

[SDJohnny]

My concern/question: how are both Denver RBs (Bell & Bell) both projected higher than Warrick Dunn (and numerous other undisputed starters)?

Do you really expect both Bells to outperform Dunn?

where are you seeing that?

I didn't see this either