What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Verizon required to give ALL call data to NSA (1 Viewer)

PlasmaDogPlasma

Footballguy
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order

From the article:

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.
 
I really hate Verizon now.
Required by court order. Guessing all the major carriers have a similar order.
It's one thing that corporations data mine us with our smartphones in order to bring or influence us into their product. It's something worse when the Government data mines us in order to protect us with basic phone calls.

Civil liberties be damned to the war on terror.

 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
The article is pointing out how Obama is expanding W's policy in this particular area. When it comes to the war on terror and our civil liberties, he ain't any different. That's not something I really want to live with going forward, and further expansion of anti-terror policy that infringes on our liberties is damn worth blaming on him.

 
Verizon - best network, below average phone selection, horrible customer service
I actually find their customer service great. I bought a GS3 with their service as well. I can go to any Verizon mall kiosk or store and have them replace those ####### PITA screen protectors that I always struggle with at no cost. In fact I have to go have them replace one tomorrow lulz.

I wish they would have the Google GS4, but I use a vanilla Android ROM on my GS3 that doesn't have any of the Sammy software, so I dunno how Google will develop for the hardware of that device. I don't have a few of those Sammy GS3 features on this device anymore because I ####canned Touch Wiz.

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.

 
I really hate Verizon now.
Now? I've hated them with a passion for years. I'm forced by default to have their home internet...I hate seeing money in my bank account go to them every month.
No wonder Otis has to go on "sick gambling runs". He was pimping FiOS hard a couple of years ago. Otis need new baby shoes.
I dug Fios TV when I had it, but at the time it was that or Bright House cable. As soon as I moved outta there I went running back to DirecTv. Fios TV was slick though. Too bad it comes with Verizon attached.
 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
Of course not. Why would we blame the guy in charge? Should we continue with the 'Blame Bush' shtick the left has been using the last 5 years so they don't have to take responsibility for ANYTHING?

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
I blame the morons that under W used the company line "its all ok as long as you ain't doin' nuthing wrong".

At no point has Obama ever given me the impression that when it comes to getting stuff done he is highly principled. This is just another example of "the ends justifies the means" and "we the people demand 'warm and cozy' feelings of security".

This should be the great scandal but it is more of just giving the people what they want.

 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
The article is pointing out how Obama is expanding W's policy in this particular area. When it comes to the war on terror and our civil liberties, he ain't any different. That's not something I really want to live with going forward, and further expansion of anti-terror policy that infringes on our liberties is damn worth blaming on him.
Playing devils advocate but what does it really matter in the grand scheme of things. I get the "slippery slope" argument but this was a part of the Patriot Act. How exactly will the Feds collecting phone call info directly affect me?

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I see this excuse pop up quite a bit. What's Obama's reason for leaving it in place? You can't blame the last guy when you have the power to take care of it.

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I see this excuse pop up quite a bit. What's Obama's reason for leaving it in place? You can't blame the last guy when you have the power to take care of it.
I dont think you understand politics as well as you think you do

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I see this excuse pop up quite a bit. What's Obama's reason for leaving it in place? You can't blame the last guy when you have the power to take care of it.
You really believe Obama could get that through Congress?

Or did you mean he could get rid of it using his dictatorial powers?

 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
The article is pointing out how Obama is expanding W's policy in this particular area. When it comes to the war on terror and our civil liberties, he ain't any different. That's not something I really want to live with going forward, and further expansion of anti-terror policy that infringes on our liberties is damn worth blaming on him.
Playing devils advocate but what does it really matter in the grand scheme of things. I get the "slippery slope" argument but this was a part of the Patriot Act. How exactly will the Feds collecting phone call info directly affect me?
this. And this is why these abuses are allowed to keep taking place--we want warm and fuzzies knowing that we're protected against terrorism and since 99% of the people are pretty much oblivious and uninvolved in those machinations there will never be enough of a groundswell to change the practice. For that matter--after anything like this becomes transparent enough to where the terrorists manage to stage an event around them we generally decide we don't want to change the practice. I believe the catchphrase is 'necessary evil'. :mellow:

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I see this excuse pop up quite a bit. What's Obama's reason for leaving it in place? You can't blame the last guy when you have the power to take care of it.
You really believe Obama could get that through Congress?

Or did you mean he could get rid of it using his dictatorial powers?
He doesn't need to have the Patriot Act overturned to prevent this. He could just order NSA not to seek the info
 
He doesn't need to have the Patriot Act overturned to prevent this. He could just order NSA not to seek the info
Great point.FWIW, I'm on board with all this being a terrible overreach (and have said so many times). Just think it's funny how few people seemed to mind until the Kenyan Muslin Communist Nazi Usurper started doing it too.
 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.

 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.
While I agree with your assessment but do you really see any President relinquishing that sort of power? Once Pandoras box is open then thats it.

 
This comes as zero surprise. Just the tip of the iceberg fellas. Been going on for a long time.

I wish this would see half the outrage the DoJ's investigation of leaks did.

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I seem to recall the Patriot Act having broad support on both sides of the aisle and was scary as ####. It still is and that should be fixed imo.
 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.
While I agree with your assessment but do you really see any President relinquishing that sort of power? Once Pandoras box is open then thats it.
Which is what I said when we gave that power to Bush. It is very hard to put the genie back. And yes I would hope that we could elect someone who would say enough is enough. This president won't.

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
He did crank out the Patriot Act and this is where the roots are.
I seem to recall the Patriot Act having broad support on both sides of the aisle and was scary as ####. It still is and that should be fixed imo.
good luck with that because that aint never happening. I believe Michael Moore for all his faults correctly nailed this one.

 
Oof, minor thread hi-jack. Max Threshold needs to come in here quick to bring the hysteria back into the fold.
Nah. You can continue to keep your head in the sand (or in your a#s?). Stick with the 'Blame Bush' line.
I blame the morons that under W used the company line "its all ok as long as you ain't doin' nuthing wrong".

At no point has Obama ever given me the impression that when it comes to getting stuff done he is highly principled. This is just another example of "the ends justifies the means" and "we the people demand 'warm and cozy' feelings of security".

This should be the great scandal but it is more of just giving the people what they want.
Yep,this is what the people have asked for. The NSA didn't build the giant data center in Utah for shots and giggles. Nothing new to see here.
 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.
While I agree with your assessment but do you really see any President relinquishing that sort of power? Once Pandoras box is open then thats it.
Which is what I said when we gave that power to Bush. It is very hard to put the genie back. And yes I would hope that we could elect someone who would say enough is enough. This president won't.
Rand Paul maybe. But who knows what they will do with power once they get in. We thought Obama would be different, obviously thats not the case.

I dont see Hillary or Christie fixing it either.

 
Verizon - best network, below average phone selection, horrible customer service
I actually find their customer service great. I bought a GS3 with their service as well. I can go to any Verizon mall kiosk or store and have them replace those ####### PITA screen protectors that I always struggle with at no cost. In fact I have to go have them replace one tomorrow lulz. I wish they would have the Google GS4, but I use a vanilla Android ROM on my GS3 that doesn't have any of the Sammy software, so I dunno how Google will develop for the hardware of that device. I don't have a few of those Sammy GS3 features on this device anymore because I ####canned Touch Wiz.
Yeah, nothing but the best service from Verizon ever since they bought out Alltel for me.
 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.
While I agree with your assessment but do you really see any President relinquishing that sort of power? Once Pandoras box is open then thats it.
Probably not, no.

My biggest problem with this story isn't actually the collecting-phone-records part. I'm much more bothered by the fact that stuff like this can be done in a secret court system in which we don't even get to see the government's justification for this action or the way in which the government is interpreting the law. I understand the rationale for why FISA courts exist, but this is pretty obviously a situation that's ripe for even worse abuses than this one.

 
over/under on number of posts until Obama gets blamed?
How can the President possibly evade responsibility for this sort of thing? It's his agency.
Exactly. It's also his policy. He has done nothing to shrink the imperial presidency and everything to expand it. This is Bush's 4th term as far as I am concerned at least in this area. Massive failure by Obama to even attempt to deliver on the promises he made the first time around.
While I agree with your assessment but do you really see any President relinquishing that sort of power? Once Pandoras box is open then thats it.
Which is what I said when we gave that power to Bush. It is very hard to put the genie back. And yes I would hope that we could elect someone who would say enough is enough. This president won't.
Rand Paul maybe. But who knows what they will do with power once they get in. We thought Obama would be different, obviously thats not the case.

I dont see Hillary or Christie fixing it either.
Obama and Hillary are the same politicians. Both Third Way conservative suckups. For all his faults I'd think there was a better chance Christy might actually make some changes. But I wouldn't hold my breath or anything. And Rand Paul will never sniff the White House.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top