What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vick to have freedom to call plays (1 Viewer)

tribecalledjeff

Footballguy
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2752463

MIAMI -- Taking a different tact than his predecessor, Atlanta Falcons coach Bobby Petrino will let Michael Vick take a more active role in running the offense.

Michael Vick

Quarterback

Atlanta Falcons

Profile

2006 SEASON STATISTICS

Att Comp Yds TD Int Rat

388 204 2171 20 13 75.7

That includes allowing Vick to call audibles.

Under previous coach Jim Mora, Vick basically had to go with whatever play was called by offensive coordinator Greg Knapp, even if it looked doomed when the quarterback got to the line and studied the defensive alignment.

Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.

Things will be different under Petrino, who was lured away from Louisville after Mora was fired.

"We're going to put it all on him," the new coach said Friday while making the rounds at the Super Bowl media center. "It's new to him, but he's excited about the challenge. I think that's the way you train a quarterback."

Petrino said Vick "really believes in himself to get it done."

Mora was let go after the Falcons finished 7-9 and failed to make the playoffs for the second year in a row. The team reached the NFC Championship Game during the 2004 season, but fell apart in the second half of the last two seasons.

Two weeks ago, Vick came under scrutiny after officers seized a water bottle from him at Miami International Airport. Police said it smelled of marijuana and had a secret compartment, but lab tests found no evidence of drugs.

The Falcons initially came down hard on Vick, with general manager Rich McKay proclaiming that his star player had "let a lot of people down." Since Vick was cleared, the team has dismissed trade rumors and reiterated he will be the No. 1 quarterback.

"It was a little interesting, I guess," Petrino said. "But the situation got resolved and we put it behind us."

Petrino was in Miami at the urging of owner Arthur Blank, who thought it would be good for the new coach to do some networking with the pros after spending most of his career in the college ranks.

"Arthur had to talk me into it a little bit," said Petrino, who will fly back to Atlanta on Sunday morning. "I thought I had a lot to do, but he went through my wife and kids to get it done. They're down here, too, and having a great time."

Petrino has studied extensive film on Vick's passing style and talked with the quarterback about what he "needs to do to get better and what the people around him need to do to get better."

To that end, Petrino acknowledged the need for changing the philosophy of the offensive line, which favored smaller, quicker players and relied on zone blocking schemes under Mora. While the Falcons led the league in rushing the last three years, they struggled to give Vick adequate protection when he dropped back to pass.

A major overhaul is impossible, Petrino said, but the new staff will encourage its linemen to get bigger and stronger.

"One of the things we're finding is that it takes all the guys on offense doing their job at the highest level for a play to work," he said. "We've got to make sure we give Mike the time and space to make his throws. We've got to make sure the receivers are exactly where they need to be. You've got to be able to do both things to throw the ball downfield."

Petrino said he has full confidence that Vick can become a more well-rounded quarterback. Last season, he became the first QB in NFL history to rush for 1,000 yards but ranked near the bottom of the league's passer ratings.

"He can make all the throws you need to make in this league," Petrino insisted.

I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
 
Vick will audible to "FUNKY CHICKEN, ON 2"; five step drop, then he runs around in the backfield until he gets tackled (unless he's playing against a team that can't tackle). Business as usual.

 
QB draw right on 3... break

QB draw left on 3... break

QB draw middle on 3.. break

Should be interesting.

 
This won't end well. Vick has shown that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Why not let him pick the plays? Umm, because he's an idiot would be one good reason.

And with the first pick of the 2008 draft the Falcon Select....

 
Yeah it was frustrating seeing Vick with a defense showing its about to blitz & he wouldn't audible just run the play for a big loss. I always wondered why he never audibled (he did under Dan Reeves) and now I see why.

 
This makes a ton of sense. It gives Vick the chance to sink or swim and for the Falcons to see what he can do when given some control. It also takes the pressure off Petrino as the scapegoat if Vick fails. If Petrino calls a play and Vick audibles for a loss of yards or turnover then Vick gets the blame. If he doesn't audible and the plays goes for a loss then he still gets the blame. If the play is a success then Vick gets more confidence and hopefully makes progress as an NFL QB.

All in all it is a great move for the Falcons to give him the full QB workload and stop making excuses and protecting him from negative criticsm. Lets find out what hes made of.

 
<Vick> Duuuuude, so like, you run way over there and I'll throw it to you. And you, man, run over to the side, I'll throw it to you too. Whoa. It is so loud in here dude. Does anyone have any Pringles? Dude, I've soooo got the munchies right now. </Vick>

 
Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
He was allowed to call audibles.
If you are trying to say that those are audibles, I disagree. He couldn't change the play. But thanks for your contribution :ph34r:
So changing the protection scheme at the line is not an audible? Interesting. I'll make a note of your level of understanding of football .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rhawkins68 said:
tribecalledjeff said:
rhawkins68 said:
Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
He was allowed to call audibles.
If you are trying to say that those are audibles, I disagree. He couldn't change the play. But thanks for your contribution :ph34r:
So changing the protection scheme at the line is not an audible? Interesting. I'll make a note of your level of understanding of football .
Ok, Mr. Semantics. Next year, Michael Vick is going to have the freedom to change into a completely new play at the line of scrimmage, something that he has never had before. I think this is a positive for him. That better?
 
rhawkins68 said:
tribecalledjeff said:
rhawkins68 said:
Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
He was allowed to call audibles.
If you are trying to say that those are audibles, I disagree. He couldn't change the play. But thanks for your contribution :goodposting:
So changing the protection scheme at the line is not an audible? Interesting. I'll make a note of your level of understanding of football .
Ok, Mr. Semantics. Next year, Michael Vick is going to have the freedom to change into a completely new play at the line of scrimmage, something that he has never had before. I think this is a positive for him. That better?
No need to be touchy. I was simply pointing out that he had the ability to Audible all along and that incorrect assumptions were being made. Nothing more nothing less. I'll leave it at that and not address the rest of the post.
 
rhawkins68 said:
tribecalledjeff said:
rhawkins68 said:
Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
He was allowed to call audibles.
If you are trying to say that those are audibles, I disagree. He couldn't change the play. But thanks for your contribution :thumbup:
So changing the protection scheme at the line is not an audible? Interesting. I'll make a note of your level of understanding of football .
Ok, Mr. Semantics. Next year, Michael Vick is going to have the freedom to change into a completely new play at the line of scrimmage, something that he has never had before. I think this is a positive for him. That better?
No need to be touchy. I was simply pointing out that he had the ability to Audible all along and that incorrect assumptions were being made. Nothing more nothing less. I'll leave it at that and not address the rest of the post.
The point of the article was obviously that he never had the ability to call a new play at the line of scrimmage, whereas before his options were limited to adjusting the current play call. This leaves 2 options:1. You knew my point, and were just being a jackass. Now, when called out on it, you try to pretend that you weren't being a jackass. In my book, that's the worst kind. If you're going to do it, go all out.2. You have the brain of a 2 month old insect and didn't understand the point of the article. I'll leave it to you to pick which one is the case.
 
This won't end well. Vick has shown that he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Why not let him pick the plays? Umm, because he's an idiot would be one good reason.

And with the first pick of the 2008 draft the Falcon Select....
Care to elaborate on this? I don't see many Falcons games, so I'm curious what makes you think this. Is this a commonly held opinion by the public? If so, why?
 
rhawkins68 said:
tribecalledjeff said:
rhawkins68 said:
Vick's only options were changing the protection scheme and calling which side of the field to run the play.
I wasn't aware that he wasn't allowed to call audibles. Seems like a cautious positive for Vick.
He was allowed to call audibles.
If you are trying to say that those are audibles, I disagree. He couldn't change the play. But thanks for your contribution :banned:
So changing the protection scheme at the line is not an audible? Interesting. I'll make a note of your level of understanding of football .
Ok, Mr. Semantics. Next year, Michael Vick is going to have the freedom to change into a completely new play at the line of scrimmage, something that he has never had before. I think this is a positive for him. That better?
No need to be touchy. I was simply pointing out that he had the ability to Audible all along and that incorrect assumptions were being made. Nothing more nothing less. I'll leave it at that and not address the rest of the post.
The point of the article was obviously that he never had the ability to call a new play at the line of scrimmage, whereas before his options were limited to adjusting the current play call. This leaves 2 options:1. You knew my point, and were just being a jackass. Now, when called out on it, you try to pretend that you weren't being a jackass. In my book, that's the worst kind. If you're going to do it, go all out.2. You have the brain of a 2 month old insect and didn't understand the point of the article. I'll leave it to you to pick which one is the case.
Like I said he was able to audible and the assumption he was not was wrong. Once again I'll hold off on the rest of the uninformative pieces of the post.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top