What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Viking Packer Pregame (1 Viewer)

But you won't hear from the messenger,

Don't wanna know bout something that you don't understand,

You got no fear of the underdog,

That's why you will not survive! (Hey!)

 
Packers played well below their level for a good portion of the first half. Packers will have no issue next week if they can get a little momentum early next week. Not to mention if the defense can put up a little more fight and not give up some of the horrid 2nd/3rd and longs they let go by.

 
86 yards for All Day.
What's his average in two games vs the Pack this year?Let's face it. You are two stupid INT's from Ponder from being 0-2 against the Vikes.The Packers are definitely favored to win, but the score should certainly be within 7 points either way.
 
Packers played well below their level for a good portion of the first half. Packers will have no issue next week if they can get a little momentum early next week. Not to mention if the defense can put up a little more fight and not give up some of the horrid 2nd/3rd and longs they let go by.
Cobb back next week?
 
Packers played well below their level for a good portion of the first half. Packers will have no issue next week if they can get a little momentum early next week. Not to mention if the defense can put up a little more fight and not give up some of the horrid 2nd/3rd and longs they let go by.
To me, that was more indicative of what this GB team is. The first game against the Vikes at Lambeau was the Packers just sort of hanging in there offensively while the Vikes D got too tired to stop them because they spent the entire 2nd half on the field due to Ponder's ineffectiveness. If Ponder plays with any sort of efficiency, like he did today, the Packers lose, regardless of venue.
 
Packers played well below their level for a good portion of the first half. Packers will have no issue next week if they can get a little momentum early next week. Not to mention if the defense can put up a little more fight and not give up some of the horrid 2nd/3rd and longs they let go by.
To me, that was more indicative of what this GB team is. The first game against the Vikes at Lambeau was the Packers just sort of hanging in there offensively while the Vikes D got too tired to stop them because they spent the entire 2nd half on the field due to Ponder's ineffectiveness. If Ponder plays with any sort of efficiency, like he did today, the Packers lose, regardless of venue.
No credit to the Vikings DF for what they did to "help" the Pack play below their average level? I think the Pack should be really scared, Vikes have been playing "must-win" football for 4 weeks now, and are on a roll. Plus they have the kind of game plan that can beat any team in the league (49ers, Texans, GB this season.) I do think they need to do the same as today, and get a lead, their game plan doesn't work well from behind.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top