I didn't post any data from another message forum, so I'm not sure what you mean by that. I got my data from PFR, which is an excellent reference, and I reference their data all the time. Sorry, but I am not a member of the Associated Press, so I have to get the data from some reference. It turns out that perhaps they had a mistake for 2003 for Roaf's 1st vs. 2nd team All Pro selection.So I went to Wikipedia, and found that source to show Roaf as AP 1st team All Pro in 1994, 1995, 2003, and 2004. However, it also showed that he tied with another tackle in both 2003 and 2004 (i.e., AP chose 3 tackles in both of those seasons).Chest Rockwell said:My All-Pro info isn't off base. You've simply chosen to ignore the UPI, PFW, SN etc. That's fine, but it's usually a bad idea to copy and paste info from other message forums (your OP). It usually leads to faulty data sets, which is the case here. Roaf has four 1st team AP All-Pro selections. Not three. Pro-Football Reference is wrong. He achieved 1st team status in '94, '95, '03, and '04. This is also a solid indicator of his long term excellence.
He had more total selections but trailed two others in number of first team selections. That's why I said there was no clear advantage over any of them except Faulk. I didn't say no advantage. It's debatable whether Roaf's collective AP selections are better than those of Dawson and Sanders.Chest Rockwell said:Besides, if the AP's opinion is the only applicable criteria to measure greatness, then I believe you've reinforced my original point. Willie Roaf earned more Associated Press All-Pro selections than anyone on the list.
For some reason I thought you were responsible for the OP. Please disregard the "cut and paste" comment as it was erroneous on my part to direct it at you.I didn't post any data from another message forum, so I'm not sure what you mean by that. I got my data from PFR, which is normally an excellent reference, and I reference their data all the time. Sorry, but I am not a member of the Associated Press, so I have to get the data from some reference. It turns out that perhaps they had a mistake for 2003.So I went to Wikipedia, and found that source to show Roaf as AP 1st team All Pro in 1994, 1995, 2003, and 2004. However, it also showed that he tied with another tackle in both 2003 and 2004 (i.e., AP chose 3 tackles in both of those seasons).Chest Rockwell said:My All-Pro info isn't off base. You've simply chosen to ignore the UPI, PFW, SN etc. That's fine, but it's usually a bad idea to copy and paste info from other message forums (your OP). It usually leads to faulty data sets, which is the case here. Roaf has four 1st team AP All-Pro selections. Not three. Pro-Football Reference is wrong. He achieved 1st team status in '94, '95, '03, and '04. This is also a solid indicator of his long term excellence.He had more total selections but trailed two others in number of first team selections. That's why I said there was no clear advantage over any of them except Faulk. I didn't say no advantage. It's debatable whether Roaf's collective AP selections are better than those of Dawson and Sanders.Chest Rockwell said:Besides, if the AP's opinion is the only applicable criteria to measure greatness, then I believe you've reinforced my original point. Willie Roaf earned more Associated Press All-Pro selections than anyone on the list.
I think people really underestimate just how large an impact Ed Sabol has had, not only on pro football, but pro sports altogether.If you read America's Game by Mike McCambridge, you realize that NFL Films was seen as a visionary tool by Pete Rozelle as a way to market professional football. He had to fight for the owners to continue to fund it's existence because it really was essentially overhead. But in terms of the way the NFL was able to market itself with the interspersement of musical scores and inside access to teams and players, that type of footage helped the NFL build it's identity in the media age, particularly in an era where color TV was replacing black and white ones. Now think about highlight shows in not just football and other sports...they all include music of some sort. That started with NFL Films.In essense, the brand of the NFL owes a lot to NFL Films and Ed Sabol. To me, against all the other great players on this list, he deserves entry first.
Well said. What Sabol accomplished was to mythologize the NFL through his films. Joe Namath in slow motion running off the field with his index finger raised. George Allen pumping up the Redskins ("40 men together can't lose"). Hank Stram masterminding his offense from the sidelines ("65 Toss Power Trap"). The bad boy Oakland Raider teams of the 1970's ("The autumn wind is a Raider"). Lombardi triumphant at the Ice Bowl. John Facenda's narrations. Sam Spence's music. I've never even seen those games I referenced above but thanks to NFL films I feel like I have. Just classic ageless stuff. It's always a shame when someone is selected to receive the game's highest honor but is no longer around to be inducted. Ed Sabol is 94 years old. He should be first on every voters' list this year.I think people really underestimate just how large an impact Ed Sabol has had, not only on pro football, but pro sports altogether.If you read America's Game by Mike McCambridge, you realize that NFL Films was seen as a visionary tool by Pete Rozelle as a way to market professional football. He had to fight for the owners to continue to fund it's existence because it really was essentially overhead. But in terms of the way the NFL was able to market itself with the interspersement of musical scores and inside access to teams and players, that type of footage helped the NFL build it's identity in the media age, particularly in an era where color TV was replacing black and white ones. Now think about highlight shows in not just football and other sports...they all include music of some sort. That started with NFL Films.In essense, the brand of the NFL owes a lot to NFL Films and Ed Sabol. To me, against all the other great players on this list, he deserves entry first.
I agree with everything said regarding Sabol's impact on the NFL and believe he deserves to be in. That being said, contributors just don't normally get a lot of recognition, much less induction.I think there have only been 2 contributors inducted since 2000 (double-checked this; of the 45 non-senior inductions since 2000 only Dan Rooney and Ralph Wilson, Jr. have made it as contributors). There is no retirement restriction for contributors, as there is for players and coaches, so he's been eligible as much as anyone has nominated him (he's been a preliminary nominee every year since at least '05). As far as I can tell, this is the first time Sabol has made it as a finalist (I believe Wilson and Rooney were each 3-time finalists before getting induction). He hasn't even been a semifinalist, at least going back to '04 (can't find any easy info on semifinalists prior to this).Since his "resume" hasn't really changed over the past year or two, maybe the fact that he finally made it as a finalist is evidence that he's got a real shot this year (maybe the voters are thinking along the same lines of "get him in while he's alive"MarshallRob said:Well said. What Sabol accomplished was to mythologize the NFL through his films. Joe Namath in slow motion running off the field with his index finger raised. George Allen pumping up the Redskins ("40 men together can't lose"). Hank Stram masterminding his offense from the sidelines ("65 Toss Power Trap"). The bad boy Oakland Raider teams of the 1970's ("The autumn wind is a Raider"). Lombardi triumphant at the Ice Bowl. John Facenda's narrations. Sam Spence's music. I've never even seen those games I referenced above but thanks to NFL films I feel like I have. Just classic ageless stuff. It's always a shame when someone is selected to receive the game's highest honor but is no longer around to be inducted. Ed Sabol is 94 years old. He should be first on every voters' list this year.I think people really underestimate just how large an impact Ed Sabol has had, not only on pro football, but pro sports altogether.If you read America's Game by Mike McCambridge, you realize that NFL Films was seen as a visionary tool by Pete Rozelle as a way to market professional football. He had to fight for the owners to continue to fund it's existence because it really was essentially overhead. But in terms of the way the NFL was able to market itself with the interspersement of musical scores and inside access to teams and players, that type of footage helped the NFL build it's identity in the media age, particularly in an era where color TV was replacing black and white ones. Now think about highlight shows in not just football and other sports...they all include music of some sort. That started with NFL Films.In essense, the brand of the NFL owes a lot to NFL Films and Ed Sabol. To me, against all the other great players on this list, he deserves entry first.
wow...when I think of a HOF'er.....Tim Brown isn't the first name that comes to mind, but boy he has put up some pretty impressive all-time numbers....Tim Brown, WRPlayed for 17 seasons, made 9 Pro Bowls, but never a 1st team All-Pro, Appeared in 1 Super Bowl but didn't win, Led the NFL 1 year in receptions, 1 year in Kickoff Return Yards and Yards per Kickoff Return, 1 year in Punt Return Yards.Ranks 4th All-time in Receptions (1,094)Ranks 4th All-time in Receiving Yards (14,934)Ranks 6th All-time in Receiving Touchdowns (100)Ranks 17th All-time in Yards from Scrimmage (15,124)Ranks 5th All-time in All-Purpose Yards (19,679)
I agree, Roaf should absolutely get in. My 5 would be Faulk, Sanders, Sharpe, Roaf, and 1 of Carter/Brown. Roaf absolutely belongs in the top 5.OK. However, he certainly isn't less deserving.He isn't more deserving than Faulk, Sanders, or Dawson, period. And that only leaves two more spots. IMO he isn't one of the next two most deserving, though that is where it gets more debatable. I think he should and will get inducted in a future class. But to suggest that anyone not voting for him is way off base just shows that you are way off base.13/67 voted for Willie Roaf.![]()
![]()
![]()
13 of 67. Really?
The bulk of the participants in this thread ought to just leave quietly and never, I mean never take part in a HOF discussion again.
13 out of 67? Embarrassing.
1. Faulk, Sanders, and Dawson each made one NFL All-Decade team. Roaf made two. And, he made the 2000's squad despite retiring after the '05 season. How many players made an All-Decade squad even though they only participated in half the number of applicable seasons? No clue here, but I can't imagine it's more than a handful...if any.
Advantage: Roaf
2. Roaf made the Pro Bowl 11 times and a 9 time All-Pro (6 1st team selections). Faulk was a 7 time Pro Bowl selection and 6 time All-Pro (3 1st team selections). Sanders is credited w/8 Pro Bowls and 8 All-Pro selections (6 time 1st teamer). Dawson made 7 Pro Bowls and was named an All-Pro 6 times (all 1st teamers). It's close, but math is math and more is better.
Advantage: Roaf
3. Roaf was a 1st team All-Pro and Pro Bowl selection the last season he played in the NFL. Dawson was two years removed from any official accreditation for exceptional performance. Faulk and Sanders were unquestionably shells of their former selves by the time they walked away from the game. Roaf dominated until his final snap.
Advantage: Roaf
Agreed. I think because he was on the smaller side for TE's, most people look at him as more of a WR who was labeled as a TE. But he was a very willing and capable blocker. I don't know where or why he got the stigma attached to him that he was a poor blocker. It's simply not true. But, the bottom line is, he retired holding nearly every single career record at the TE position. How has he not made it already on that basis alone?sharpe is known as a receiving TE, but he also blocked for TD's 2000 yeard season and was a key blocker for Jamal Lewis as well. he should get more credit for his blocing.
Trench guys definitely have an uphill climb... Roaf compares very favorably to Gary Zimmerman in a lot of ways--both were 2 time All Decade Team Members, both were 3 times First Team All Pros, Roaf had 11 Pro Bowl appearances to Zimmerman's 7. I think Roaf is a tad more deserving than Zimmerman, but it's very close. And Zimmerman had to wait I think 5 years before finally getting in.For some reason I thought you were responsible for the OP. Please disregard the "cut and paste" comment as it was erroneous on my part to direct it at you.I didn't post any data from another message forum, so I'm not sure what you mean by that. I got my data from PFR, which is normally an excellent reference, and I reference their data all the time. Sorry, but I am not a member of the Associated Press, so I have to get the data from some reference. It turns out that perhaps they had a mistake for 2003.So I went to Wikipedia, and found that source to show Roaf as AP 1st team All Pro in 1994, 1995, 2003, and 2004. However, it also showed that he tied with another tackle in both 2003 and 2004 (i.e., AP chose 3 tackles in both of those seasons).My All-Pro info isn't off base. You've simply chosen to ignore the UPI, PFW, SN etc. That's fine, but it's usually a bad idea to copy and paste info from other message forums (your OP). It usually leads to faulty data sets, which is the case here. Roaf has four 1st team AP All-Pro selections. Not three. Pro-Football Reference is wrong. He achieved 1st team status in '94, '95, '03, and '04. This is also a solid indicator of his long term excellence.He had more total selections but trailed two others in number of first team selections. That's why I said there was no clear advantage over any of them except Faulk. I didn't say no advantage. It's debatable whether Roaf's collective AP selections are better than those of Dawson and Sanders.Besides, if the AP's opinion is the only applicable criteria to measure greatness, then I believe you've reinforced my original point. Willie Roaf earned more Associated Press All-Pro selections than anyone on the list.That being said, I felt I needed to overstate the case for Roaf because the lack of recognition for his accomplishments in this thread is startling. The insinuation that Faulk, Sanders, Carter, and Sharpe breathe some sort of rarefied air which is somehow more distinguished and pure than the oxygen Roaf inhales, is just wrong. And as far as the Hall of Fame is concerned, trench guys are always going to have an uphill climb to receive the attention their play warrants. In today's NFL, quarterback is the only position which commands a higher average salary than left tackle. Owners and front offices figured out who the heart of an NFL team was years ago. It's time for Canton to follow suit.
Trench guys definitely have an uphill climb... Roaf compares very favorably to Gary Zimmerman in a lot of ways--both were 2 time All Decade Team Members, both were 3 times First Team All Pros, Roaf had 11 Pro Bowl appearances to Zimmerman's 7. I think Roaf is a tad more deserving than Zimmerman, but it's very close. And Zimmerman had to wait I think 5 years before finally getting in.
You have named 7 non-senior candidates. No more than 5 can be inducted in a single class.I'll go with the same guys I thought would get in back in August: Marshall FaulkDeion SandersShannon SharpeWillie RoafDermontii Dawson (LONG overdue)Cris Carter Steve Sabol is way overdue as well. He's the Cecil B. DeMille of Sports.
The idea that Tim Brown is a top 10 contender but Carter isn't a freaking joke.
I agree that Carter should be nominated but Ed Sabol should have been in the Hall of Fame years ago. Hell NFL Films should be inducted as a group for what it did for pro football.Horrible, horrible choices. I don't know who gets to vote but the HOF is losing credibility when a guy who never played or coached gets in before a guy who was the best possession WR of all time.
That may be the best case against the value of AV I've seen in awhile.Career Approximate Values . . .Marshall Faulk, RB (165)Chris Doleman, DE (156)Chris Hanburger, LB (148)Deion Sanders, CB / KR (147)Willie Roaf, OT (146)Tim Brown, WR / KR (145)Cris Carter, WR (135)Shannon Sharpe, TE (134)Andre Reed, WR (132)Curtis Martin, RB (129)Richard Dent, DE (122)Cortez Kennedy, DT (120)Dermontti Dawson, OC (106)Jerome Bettis, RB (102)Charles Haley, DE (102)Les Richter, LB (79)Ed Sabol, NFL Films (N/A)
That is just the total values. What are their weighted values?That may be the best case against the value of AV I've seen in awhile.Career Approximate Values . . .Marshall Faulk, RB (165)Chris Doleman, DE (156)Chris Hanburger, LB (148)Deion Sanders, CB / KR (147)Willie Roaf, OT (146)Tim Brown, WR / KR (145)Cris Carter, WR (135)Shannon Sharpe, TE (134)Andre Reed, WR (132)Curtis Martin, RB (129)Richard Dent, DE (122)Cortez Kennedy, DT (120)Dermontti Dawson, OC (106)Jerome Bettis, RB (102)Charles Haley, DE (102)Les Richter, LB (79)Ed Sabol, NFL Films (N/A)![]()
So when I say that Reed should have gotten in over Dent I have some statistical support? Good to know.Career Approximate Values . . .Marshall Faulk, RB (165)Chris Doleman, DE (156)Chris Hanburger, LB (148)Deion Sanders, CB / KR (147)Willie Roaf, OT (146)Tim Brown, WR / KR (145)Cris Carter, WR (135)Shannon Sharpe, TE (134)Andre Reed, WR (132)Curtis Martin, RB (129)Richard Dent, DE (122)Cortez Kennedy, DT (120)Dermontti Dawson, OC (106)Jerome Bettis, RB (102)Charles Haley, DE (102)Les Richter, LB (79)Ed Sabol, NFL Films (N/A)