SameSongNDance
Footballguy
Guys, guys, JC arguments are ever everlasting and if they do end, they never end well. I know from experience.
As for SJax, mentioning his past isn't a good reason as to why he'll hold of Richardson in the present. If you want good reason you could point towards how even when SJax was much less than 100%, Richardson still only got 5 touches on the ball last week. You could also point towards how SJax was running better than Richardson in the WAS game before he got injured. Those are the arguments I would use.
As for SJax, mentioning his past isn't a good reason as to why he'll hold of Richardson in the present. If you want good reason you could point towards how even when SJax was much less than 100%, Richardson still only got 5 touches on the ball last week. You could also point towards how SJax was running better than Richardson in the WAS game before he got injured. Those are the arguments I would use.
Last edited by a moderator: