honestly, there really is no right answer, and 50% of the people will be pissed off either way
There's no right answer, but there are answers that are more or less wrong than others. And they are choosing a more wrong than less wrong.
No there's not. If you reset all bids, the people who got their bids in early will be screwed. If you keep the bids that ran, the people who didn't get their bids in early get screwed. I don't know how anyone can say which one was "less wrong".
I don't know how you can say one is not less wrong.If you reset the bids, the teams that won players may not have even won them without the gaff, so you can't even say for sure they all got screwed. I'm sure some would have won them, and yes, those teams may get screwed. But they at least still have the option of bidding again on those players.If you keep the bids, then some teams never got their bids taken into account, and got screwed. They get zero chance at the players.As I said, there is no right answer. Because either way someone gets screwed. But in the one case, all teams still have a chance to win the players. In the other, teams are given zero chance to win the players. How can anyone say that one is not worse than the other? Unless the person is on a team who got players and doesn't want to lose them, I don't understand it.