This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I’d give Pitts one more week.
Gotta see if Allen is playing 1st.
Ertz in TE-P. I don’t like Cooper this week.
Pitts > Hock. I think this will be a breakout game for Pitts this season. Rams and Saints Ds > Seattle. I think Thomas will be a TE1 soon if he is not already there. They are ramping up his usage since he is returning from an injury. I would still take Pitts over him although 2 bad fantasy games means you should probably just cut him.I’m benching Hock for Logan Thomas.
I don’t disagree - I advised starting Pitts.Pitts > Hock. I think this will be a breakout game for Pitts this season. Rams and Saints Ds > Seattle. I think Thomas will be a TE1 soon if he is not already there. They are ramping up his usage since he is returning from an injury. I would still take Pitts over him although 2 bad fantasy games means you should probably just cut him.I’m benching Hock for Logan Thomas.
Jacobs or Smith imo. I'd lean Jacobs..feel like he's due for a td
Tougher call here.
You play in too many leagues, you also need to draft better if you need three of these guys in your lineup.
I like what I see from all these guys so go with the ones you want to root for most.
Henry. This seems panicky. I know his last game was ugly, but not “bench him for Patterson” ugly. My $.02
Moore / Thielen
I need one more as well, as of now I have those three and London in the flex
You play in too many leagues, you also need to draft better if you need three of these guys in your lineup.
Switch it by Sunday ... Dillion primed for big day.
I pretty much agree with both calls. I think, most likely (probably, maybe, hopefully) Russ is eventually going to cook but, man they look like they have no idea what is going on in Denver ATM. I don't know about the analytics of starting players against your own defense, it seems intuitively logical not to do it but I would not be surprised if the math did not support that conclusion. Still, you have to love what Goff & the Lions are doing right now and no one should be afraid of the Minnesota defense.
Ooooooof
The world had absolutely turned purple.
Wow, how crazy is it that this is a tough call?
Wentz ATM and it's not really close for me. He has good weapons a mediocre defense, a mediocre ground attack and he is putting the ball up 45 times per game.
I also forgot to add in that comment that I read a post from a Denver homer (I wish I could remember who and in which thread) about how Russ looks fat and slow. It never crossed my mind watching the first two games but, in retrospect I think that may be true.
Agree. What I’ve seen from the Giants though is the offense goes thru Barkley. The qb’s value on the giants is his running, can’t see him throwing for 300 and 2-3 scores. Even with Brady’s weapons out, hes probably good for 2-250 and 1-2 TD’s.
Okay, you have good options so it's pretty much pin the tail(s) on the four donkeys.
This is finally the difficult decision I thought it was going to be coming into this season.
Cordarrelle has been great over the last season plus but I can't bench Henry this early in the season. The Raiders are not a particularly strong defense and the team in general has not found it's identity yet. Henry is 28 and this may be the end for his run of dominance, but I just can't see benching him yet particularly in a plus matchup.
I was kidding. I hope you know that.You play in too many leagues, you also need to draft better if you need three of these guys in your lineup.
12 team SF league, starting 2RB, 3WR as well as the 2 flex, and had Mitchell go to IR, so...
Good options at QB. I like the Detroit matchup but I also like the matchup against the Jets.
I thought he looked fine physically.
Yeah, that is my impulse as well. Can't trust Edmonds ATM. I really like what Dotson has done but he is very TD dependent, I would like to see him get a 9-10 target game before I would be comfortable rolling him out. I wouldn't fault you for doing it, and he may outperform all of the others, I'm just not ready to bank on it yet.
I see nothing wrong with that and would recommend it all day, every day. The Jets are throwing the ball 50 times per game, and doing it effectively at times. Garrett is a big part of that.
You have very good options and I can see why you are struggling with them. I definitely bench Gibson & Harris in this scenario. Gibson is a fine player who is very involved in the offense but it's a tough matchup and you have better options. Ditto Harris and he isn't even getting the same amount of opportunities.
ing the 
(<--that's a bed) Javonte is still a big part of the offense. I particularly love that Javonte was the back inside the five, what I hate is that on two drives inside the Broncos threw five times (all incomplete) and ran Javonte one time for four yards. Get your together Hackett!!!
You have very good options and I can see why you are struggling with them. I definitely bench Gibson & Harris in this scenario. Gibson is a fine player who is very involved in the offense but it's a tough matchup and you have better options. Ditto Harris and he isn't even getting the same amount of opportunities.
I really liked that Javonte was featured more than Melvin to the tune of 60% opportunity share and 67% snap share. I hope that holds as I have him as my RB2 in redraft. It's a little concerning what is happening with Hackett and his whole deer in the headlights act but it seems clear that even when Hackett is
CeeDee (anyone else think of Roxanne when you see that? Only me? Do yourself a favor, watch it. Absolutely hilarious) is getting all the targets in Dallas. It's difficult not to roll him out when he is getting 11 looks per game. But in standard scoring yards are important and TDs are king. I worry about the efficiency of the Cowboy offense and their ability to score consistently. That makes DeeDee a little big play dependent. It isn't a prohibitive matchup by any stretch even if the Giants are playing solid ball.
Cooks (see Lamb, CeeDee)
I guess that $19million/year contract doesn't seem so crazy now. Kirk is apparently the Alpha in Jacksonville and it isn't really close. He leads the Jags in snaps 128-121 (Marvin), targets 18-13 (Zay), receptions 12-11 (Engram) and TDs 2-0. The Chargers are a stout defense in many ways but they are lower middle of the pack in giving up receptions, yards & TDs. They are vulnerable to the pass even if they have a very good CB in Samuel and a great safety in Derwin.
A lot of this is a coin flip so you really need to go with your gut. I think in this situation I kind of favor:
Javonte>Kirk>Lamb>Cooks
Hmmmm - I lean Dillon only because of TB having to respect Arod. If Lazard is healthier, that should help a little more also.
I would monitor the practice reports on Allen, if it looks like he is a full go and Herbert is a full go then I think you roll him out.
Is a hurt k Allen > Cooks? Hamstrings are so easy to re-injure. I’m starting the latter two.
