What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Week 3 Waiver Wire Targets (1 Viewer)

Dare I say.....Ron Dayne?
The problem with Dayne (among many) is - - is he the backup? Might the Texans not go with Gado, Cook, or some combination? I think there's too much uncertainty there, although in the league in which I own AGreen, I guess I'd better try to figure it out (sigh). My top pick is RWhite, followed by RWilliams. I don't think Rudi is seriously hurt.
Yes. He would have gotten the carries yesterday if he had suited up.
 
Berry is a ret*rd, his advise is more ofter than not misguided. Entertaining yes, but I don't tust his advise at all. He should stick to Baseball.

Im gonna bid a ton of money on Roddy this week
The dude that's on ESPN News on Sunday mornings (with Matt Berry, the "Talented Mr Roto" :lmao: ) made a prediction today that Roddy White was going over 100 yards.Berry ( :rolleyes: ) said that if it happened, he'd wear a Roddy White jersey on next week's show. :popcorn: This comes a week after Berry ( :rolleyes: ) strongly recommended the Bengal D against the Browns. Rough couple of weeks for the Talented Mr Roto ( :rolleyes: )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
how do you pick him up on a game day ? Doesn't your league have waivers ?

Bowe, fo' sho'
:thumbup: Yep, just grabbed him. :yes:
Some don't. They allow FCFS moves at all times. I don't particularly like it. Ours used to be that way. The person/people sitting at home in front of a PC would have a huge advantage. Ours locks all moves during the games.Drafted Bowe but dropped him for someone else. :bag:
I'm in a yahoo league that allows FCFS moves at all times. Kevin Curtis was dropped last week for Randle El. I picked up Curtis at half time yesterday.
 
how do you pick him up on a game day ? Doesn't your league have waivers ?

Bowe, fo' sho'
:thumbup: Yep, just grabbed him. :yes:
Some don't. They allow FCFS moves at all times. I don't particularly like it. Ours used to be that way. The person/people sitting at home in front of a PC would have a huge advantage. Ours locks all moves during the games.Drafted Bowe but dropped him for someone else. :bag:
I'm in a yahoo league that allows FCFS moves at all times. Kevin Curtis was dropped last week for Randle El. I picked up Curtis at half time yesterday.
Other guy has to be kicking himself.
 
Roddy White.

Nate Burleson

Gotta do some thinking about Earnest Graham.

When you have limited moves, you really gotta weigh your options and save at least one or two until the end of the year. Might be too late then to find good pickups, but you can't have zero later on if you get in a pinch.

 
Cleat Spike said:
Weiner Dog said:
Mr. Nasty said:
Roddy White
:doh:
The perfect storm may be converging? No Vick, 3rd year WR, on a bad team that is always down and can't run.
Will he be better than Clayton the rest of the way?
I picked up Roddy in one of my leagues, but passed on him (he was my 2nd choice) for Mark Clayton (someone had dropped him the week before). Now I'm sure I'll be in a bidding war if I decide to go at him, but need to decide who has more value.
 
Brian Leonard - no-brainer w/ SJax down. Looked good in pre-season. Should be a start for several teams especially w/ bye week starting.

 
was leaning toward Jennings, but White & Bowe are both available in my league, so seriously considering White (may try to get them both dumping Stallworth)

 
Jennings is a #2 WR in a pass happy offense with a good QB. What more do you want from a WW Wr pickup?

 
I'm thinking damn hard right now about dropping Crayton for...

Bowe

Roddy White

Burleson

Engram

Booker

James Jones

In that order. Tough call, but I doubt I'll get one of the top dudes with my low waiver order spot...

 
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
 
Those of you picking up Roddy White... I hope you won't be counting on Roddy White.

He'll have the occasional nice game like yesterday against a struggling secondary, but mostly

he will drive you crazy with inconsistent performances and terrible hands. But still worth a flier.

 
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
Maybe this will help...Targets on the season:Branch 23Burleson 21Engram 17Targets yesterday:Burleson 12Branch 7Engram 7Not that this is completely decisive by any means as much of it could have been determined by coverage packages, but if you are looking for something to tip the scales this might be helpful. However, despite the advantage to Burleson in targets, Engram has more catches and more yards thus far. If your league awards for long TDs, then I think that makes Burleson a better value. He has a much better shot at getting the long TD. Both of these guys are worth getting on waivers IMO.
 
Those of you picking up Roddy White... I hope you won't be counting on Roddy White.

He'll have the occasional nice game like yesterday against a struggling secondary, but mostly

he will drive you crazy with inconsistent performances and terrible hands. But still worth a flier.
For me, he'd be my WR5 after Steve Smith, Berrian, Curtis, and Jennings. I can always use depth... I agree he probably won't be steady, but then I don't think Engram, Burleson, Booker, or James Jones would be any more steady. Tough call on these guys...
 
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
Maybe this will help...Targets on the season:Branch 23Burleson 21Engram 17Targets yesterday:Burleson 12Branch 7Engram 7Not that this is completely decisive by any means as much of it could have been determined by coverage packages, but if you are looking for something to tip the scales this might be helpful. However, despite the advantage to Burleson in targets, Engram has more catches and more yards thus far. If your league awards for long TDs, then I think that makes Burleson a better value. He has a much better shot at getting the long TD. Both of these guys are worth getting on waivers IMO.
Burleson also does kick and punt returns. For leagues such as mine that give points for return yardage, he's a very solid player thus far (over 10ppg in my league). Not many people are aware of this but he may be like Wes Welker the past two years. A few points off returns and a few points receiving make for a top 25 wr.
 
EARNEST F'N GRAHAM? Who is he and what's up with Caddy?
:bye: :shrug:
Is Graham the clear backup, or is Pittman still in the mix?
yea any TB homers on this board? is graham worth picking up and going to the back of the line on the waiver list....i also have caddy and pittman. dynasty league.
this is interesting:“You have one ball and we think [running back] Carnell Williams is a great back,” Gruden said. “I think he’s proven at times to be tremendous and I believe he has an unbelievable future ahead of him. [Running back] Michael Pittman has been given a lot of leftovers and rightfully so – he’s an outstanding football player. Obviously, now we have to put our minds together and figure out how to get Earnest more involved because clearly he’s also deserving of the football and that’s a good problem to have.”

link

I think if Caddy got hurt, you'd see a RBBC with Graham getting more of the carries.

 
ChuckLiddell said:
NatronIsMean said:
ChuckLiddell said:
[scooter] said:
NatronIsMean said:
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
Maybe this will help...Targets on the season:Branch 23Burleson 21Engram 17Targets yesterday:Burleson 12Branch 7Engram 7Not that this is completely decisive by any means as much of it could have been determined by coverage packages, but if you are looking for something to tip the scales this might be helpful. However, despite the advantage to Burleson in targets, Engram has more catches and more yards thus far. If your league awards for long TDs, then I think that makes Burleson a better value. He has a much better shot at getting the long TD. Both of these guys are worth getting on waivers IMO.
Guys, any idea on how long Hackett is out for?
 
AnonymousBob said:
ChuckLiddell said:
NatronIsMean said:
ChuckLiddell said:
[scooter] said:
NatronIsMean said:
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
Maybe this will help...Targets on the season:Branch 23Burleson 21Engram 17Targets yesterday:Burleson 12Branch 7Engram 7Not that this is completely decisive by any means as much of it could have been determined by coverage packages, but if you are looking for something to tip the scales this might be helpful. However, despite the advantage to Burleson in targets, Engram has more catches and more yards thus far. If your league awards for long TDs, then I think that makes Burleson a better value. He has a much better shot at getting the long TD. Both of these guys are worth getting on waivers IMO.
Burleson also does kick and punt returns. For leagues such as mine that give points for return yardage, he's a very solid player thus far (over 10ppg in my league). Not many people are aware of this but he may be like Wes Welker the past two years. A few points off returns and a few points receiving make for a top 25 wr.
:useless:
 
If Dayne is healthy and available, he is a very good pickup. Cook and Gado did nothing this week to displace him, and he is the clear number two. Don't forget he had four very good games for this team last year, so he is capable of doing well in that offense.
:D Agree. People LOOOVE to knock Ron Dayne, and he's certainly no world-beater. However, I don't win my league last year without Dayne in the playoffs. Dude came up BIG at the end of last year. Laugh all ya want - Dayne can get it done, at least in spurts.
 
ChuckLiddell said:
NatronIsMean said:
ChuckLiddell said:
[scooter] said:
NatronIsMean said:
BurlesonEngram
Unfortunately they don't get to play Cincy again.
Burleson has scored in two games in a row. Had 12 targets this week I think. Despite the fact that it came against Cinci, he is still a no-brainer WW pickup IMO.
Yeah - with Hackett out indefinitely and questions over Alexander's health, you just have to figure there will be a WR of other than Branch on Seattle. Just hard to decide which one - Engram or Burleson... or worse and more likely, a lesser combo of both.
Maybe this will help...Targets on the season:Branch 23Burleson 21Engram 17Targets yesterday:Burleson 12Branch 7Engram 7Not that this is completely decisive by any means as much of it could have been determined by coverage packages, but if you are looking for something to tip the scales this might be helpful. However, despite the advantage to Burleson in targets, Engram has more catches and more yards thus far. If your league awards for long TDs, then I think that makes Burleson a better value. He has a much better shot at getting the long TD. Both of these guys are worth getting on waivers IMO.
EXCELLENT post, Liddell. Appreciated. Burleson IS the higher upside guy of the two, and thanks for that homework. I haven't looked at targets yet. Two weeks as starter, two TDs. He's certainly worth a flier.
 
Guys, any idea on how long Hackett is out for?
No, and I looked quite a bit this past week before dropping him. I do know that it's a high ankle sprain though, so even after he gets to the point where he's teetering between Questionable and Probable, I think it's still a good 3-4 weeks before he's effective.Thus, plenty of time for Burleson to take the WR2 job, but DJ also acts as a later season risk to make that WR2 job a platoon... That should lower Burleson's value to a small degree.
 
Im gonna bid a ton of money on Roddy this week
so you think he's the real deal?
Every year WRs come out of nowhere to become valuable fantasy contributors. Why cant it be White? He was a former first round pick so obviously he has talent. Now they have a QB who actually throws the ball to WRs unlike Vick in the past. Even if Harrington gets bounced from the starting job, Leftwich has shown the ability to throw to WRs. His games so far this year 4 for 29 yds, 4 for 81 yds, and 7 for 127 yds and 1 td. Looks like hes getting the targets. Why cant he be the real deal? Not much to lose besides bid bucks which after a few weeks not much will be out there. Better grab someone too early instead of too late.
nope it's curtis
In what league is Kevin Curtis ever on waivers?
2/5 of mine.
 
Is it Stecker or Pierre Thomas in Nawlins? I am a little leery about picking up any guy named Pierre that doesn't have a hockey stick in his hand.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Scientist said:
Leonard = best pickup this week hands down.
By the looks of the sig, I'm sure you'll have the 1st crack at him. Good Luck :lmao:
Ya don't really need him though....my WR's are underperforming not my RB's. The season is still very young.EDIT TO ADD: At least my team is healthy. I would rather have health over "OUT FOR SEASON"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top