I find it hard to believe you guys are having this discussion. I have no bias for or against Gurley. I have no bias for or against Anderson. Gurley is an elite back with fantastic vision, speed and strength. He's also an exceptional receiver out of the backfield, notwithstanding what we saw yesterday. When healthy, he makes everyone on offense better because of what he does. Anderson is a nice back. I liked him in Denver and was always surprised he was never able to fully take over the lead rb spot there. He is an able receiver and IMO, a pretty solid back when healthy and in shape.
I just don't see any reasonable comparison between the two. Watching the game yesterday, it was clear he is hurt, or at least, not right. His dropped passes were crazy and whatever is bothering him physically, to me, clearly is effecting him as a whole.
There is no conversation here. Gurley is an elite talent and clearly hurt. Anderson is a good back but would never be in a championship game if Gurley was healthy, no matter how many balls he dropped in the first half. Just my two cents