coyote5
Footballguy
Y'all should probably start using first initials when talking about the FreemansLongtime Falcon homer here. The O-line upgrade is real!

edit: see now that was already cleared up

Last edited by a moderator:
Y'all should probably start using first initials when talking about the FreemansLongtime Falcon homer here. The O-line upgrade is real!
As long as Hines is there, Mack’s ceiling is capped in PPR format.Tbh, just never really been a Mack guy and now with the Luck retirement, I don’t even know what to think.
I do have to admit its a bit of a blind spot and I should be doing more analysis on him.
That’s what I’m thinking too. A bruiser between the tackles.Drake is better than Duke, but there is a lot of overlap in their skill set, so I don't see that deal making sense for HOU.
If they add another back, I think it will be more of a "thunder" type to go with what Duke brings as a receiver/speed threat.
But Hines hardly played down the stretch last year. Mack stayed on the field. And now, this preseason, the staff is saying he's a three down back. Right?As long as Hines is there, Mack’s ceiling is capped in PPR format.
and with Luck’s retirement one has to believe the offense loses a little efficacy - maybe a few more FGs, a few more 3 & outs, fewer TDs, fewer carries....
mack feels like a guy who could feel the pinch the most.
That said, Indy has a decent defense - they could keep games close enough to keep Mack relevant.
Surprisingly I’ve heard multiple podcasts putting him higher now. Which I truly find surprising. I’ll be honest - he won’t be on my team.Tbh, just never really been a Mack guy and now with the Luck retirement, I don’t even know what to think.
I do have to admit its a bit of a blind spot and I should be doing more analysis on him.
Are they?But Hines hardly played down the stretch last year. Mack stayed on the field. And now, this preseason, the staff is saying he's a three down back. Right?
Shows you how much attention I’m not paying to Mack.
Ya I get that, but I couldn't pass him up at 6.01 as my flex. Three down back doesn't change with the Luck retirement. Game script doesn't matter if it ends up being the truth.Shows you how much attention I’m not paying to Mack.
guess I’m not a Mack guy.
I still think his ceiling is capped, but if I’d missed my other guys I would have taken him, but I certainly wasn’t targeting him.
6.01 is a totally different story. Would depend on my team to that point, but I doubt I would pass on him there. ADP seems to be in the 30s.Ya I get that, but I couldn't pass him up at 6.01 as my flex. Three down back doesn't change with the Luck retirement. Game script doesn't matter if it ends up being the truth.
He's big but not bruising at all. Even in college he ran very soft for a back his size. He generally avoids contact and plays like he's Lindsay's size while ironically Lindsay is a pretty strong inside runner despite being tiny.But so far Freeman looks like the real deal bruising back they thought they drafted.
They could be waiting out cuts from other teams. Philly for example will end up releasing a decent RB like Clement, Smallwood and/or Adams.That said, the season starts in a week. I’d think they’d have already brought in someone if they were going to bring in someone.
i might be coming around on this. certainly opportunity-wise, he looks to be in a great spot. i am a little worried about his lower snap counts from last year, but I think you are right that he should be solid regardless of the offense. And I would give Reich the benefit of the doubt to scheme well. Current ADP in standard seems to be RB24, which I would expect him to be better than.IMO, Mack belongs in the highest median outcome group. What's changed about the staff saying (nevermind SHOWING in late season last year) that he was going to be a three down back? If that still stands, then it really doesn't matter who the QB is or what game script is.
I guess I got Lindsay mixed up with Lindstrom new Falcons starting first round guard. LolY'all should probably start using first initials when talking about the FreemansSometimes it's Royce sometimes its Devonta. In this case you were responding to someone talking about Royce. The Lindsey comment was the hint.
edit: see now that was already cleared up![]()
Fournette finishes top 12, replaces Mixon in it.Topic title says it all. I’ve already drafted all my teams, but thought it was an interesting topic. We talk a lot about the elites, and there’s a topic about lottery tickets, but those RB2s never seem to get any love.
Every year there are several RBs who elevate their game to top 10.
PPR scoring - who’s it going to be this year? Or will it be someone outside of the current 12-24 mix?
Lets hear it, and why you believe so.
Bonus: pick from the list to “bust” (finish outside top 24)
Here are Dodds RBs #13- 24:
13. Aaron Jones
14 Kerryon Johnson
15. Fournette
16. Freeman
17. Mack
18. Carson
19. Jacobs
20. Henry
21. Eckeler
22. Michele
23. Lindsey
24. Duke Johnson
25-36. ?