You're right. Philly should drop the guy who will be the runner-up to the league's MVP.
Peyton Manning and Drew Brees should be released as well. They didn't win their playoff games either.
Pretty funny you calling other people out for not "knowing football," but then try and put Vick in the same sentence as these two.Manning and Brees have the athletic ability and mental power to defeat NFL defenses, and have a long track record of doing so. Vick has a very unique set of talents upon which a somewhat specialized/gimmicky offense is built. Once that puzzle is figured out and some of those specific things Vick does well are taken away or limited, the holes in Vick's game become fatal. Exhibit A is this disappointing end to the Eagles season when Vick was in the MVP discussion at the mid-season point.
The Eagles weren't even supposed to be a playoff team this year. Everyone picked them to be no better than third in the division this year. They lost the two players those playoff teams were built around (McNabb and Westbrook). Thios playoff season was just gravy. Their offensive nucleus is three guys under 25 (Jackson, Maclin, and McCoy). Vick wasn't even supposed to be the starter.What he did this year was truly amazing and the Eagles would have been a .500 team without him, if that. If you think this was a disappointing season for the Eagles, then you know even less than I originally thought.
I didn't say it was a disappointing season. I said it was a disappointing
end to the season. If you're going to put so much time and effort into posting here, please put a similar effort in reading what you are responding to.Aside from screwing up what I said there, you also seem incapable of understanding what I've said since enterting this thread. I am not saying anything about how the Eagles would have been without him. I'm sure they would have been worse. I don't know what people picked the Eagles to be in the division this year, and nothing I've said about Vick is related to that. I don't know why you're talking about the Eagles losing McNabb, Westbrook, or giving me information about the age of the offense.
The point is, and has been, that Vick does not have the attributes that make a quarterback elite, and that much of his success this year was the lull in time that it took for the league to adjust to him. He had a nice little run there, but he's not Manning, not Rivers, not Brady, hell, not even Ben Roethlisberger. He's a gimmicky, fun player to watch, and the Eagles will probably be competetive with him for the life of what I'm sure will be an outrageous contract, but he will never win a Super Bowl. I thought Eagles fans would have had enough of doing really well but never winning a Super Bowl, but apparently not because they're about to sign up to do it again for the next 3-4 years.