Yogibear
Footballguy
All right, let's face it. Sacramento is the one city in America that's least deserving of a major sports franchise. The four major professional sports rank in this order: NFL football-1st, NBA basketball-2nd, MLB baseball-3rd, NHL hockey-4th. I've already said that St. Louis is the most boring sports city in America because they took the top two major professional sports for granted (football and basketball) and drove both of them out of town. Another major U.S. city to do so is what St. Louis did is San Diego. But, the focus is on Sacramento and how that city doesn't deserve a major professional sports franchise. I remember going through Sacramento before I started kindergarten and I'll be the first one to say it: there's nothing in Sacramento that's worth seeing. So how the hell did the Kings end up leaving Kansas City in 1985 for Sacramento? I'm petitioning the NBA to do something with the Kings to get them out of Sacramento. They've already tried to move them to Seattle and become the new version of the SuperSonics, but that fell through. Here's an idea: why not move the Kings to Las Vegas? I mean, they're already getting the Raiders in 2020. So why not move the Kings from that hellhole in Sacramento to Vegas? Not only that, but they've hosted an NBA All-Star Game. It only makes sense for Adam Silver to move the team to Vegas in the future. Does moving the Kings from Sacramento to Vegas make sense?