What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What is Tatum Bell's value? (1 Viewer)

tombonneau said:
He's an interesting guy. I'm not sure there is a player whose value is more varied by subjective opinion than TBell.I just acquired him in a package deal where the other owner got Bush (non-ppr). I thought I got the better RB, he thought he got hte better RB.Value is in the eye of the beholder with him.
I had both Bush and TBell. I traded away Bush thinking TBell had more actual value from here on out. Hopefully things work out. :banned:
 
tombonneau said:
He's an interesting guy. I'm not sure there is a player whose value is more varied by subjective opinion than TBell.I just acquired him in a package deal where the other owner got Bush (non-ppr). I thought I got the better RB, he thought he got hte better RB.Value is in the eye of the beholder with him.
I had both Bush and TBell. I traded away Bush thinking TBell had more actual value from here on out. Hopefully things work out. :banned:
I too let go of Reggie Bush and picked up Tatum Bell yesterday. Had to do something. I couldn't watch my season unfold without TD's and rushing yardage. No PPR so Bush has got to go :banned:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In my 14 team league I was just offered Lamont Jordan & Reggie Brown for Tatum Bell & Isaac Bruce. :no:

:bellowner:

 
Tatum Bell WILL lead the league in rushing.

It'll be a bit of a down year for RB's across theboard, but Tatum Bell comes out on top with 1,712 yards rushing.

Thisis what my psychic told me. And yes, I'm being serious, I asked her.

 
I love a good T Bell thread.

He is this years version of LJ from last year in the sense you could have gotten a top 10 RB in the 6th-8th round. Most likely not #1 like LJ was after he took over, but Tatum is still up there.

 
Tatum's gonna be a monster this year. He'll be a super monster if the Broncs can adjust to defenses figuring out the bootleg, that would help out the run game.

 
Tatum will be injured by week 6 and back fully entrenched in a RBBC by week 7. And I'm a Tatum owner.

I just don't think he can handle the punishment. Those little knicks and bruises will start to add up and before you know it he's missing practice because of them, then missing series, and then missing games.

That being said, I do think he'll have a couple good weeks before this happens. Teams saw what Javon can do and will start payng attention to the pass meaning more running room for TB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just had to say it. :D There were no Bell topics started the last few days.
That's because it's a tough week for Tatum. He's facing the one opponent capable of consistantly shutting down Denver's rushing attack this Sunday.
 
I am glad you dreamers are so confident. As long as Shanny is HC, you never know what you will get each week. #1 RB? lmao

 
A league shark just traded Vince Young for to a newbie guppy for TBell - and the newbie already has Peyton.

It smells but you have to let guppies be guppies

 
CravenM said:
A league shark just traded Vince Young for to a newbie guppy for TBell - and the newbie already has Peyton.It smells but you have to let guppies be guppies
I agree that you have to let the trade through, but I would be sure to make it abundantly clear to the guppy that every other team in the league agrees that he just got absolutely *DESTROYED* in that trade, as well as giving your reasons why... and then make it abundantly clear to the shark that destroying the competitive balance of the league by blowing up the guppies is *not cool*. Make it clear that the trade's going through, because there's no collusion, but that everyone else is going to be pissed about it, and stuff like that matters in the offseason when people are deciding whether to leave the league... or whether to kick someone else out.What's interesting to me is that this is the first absolutely, positively, blatantly lopsided deal I've ever seen posted on these boards (and I've checked out a lot of those "look how unfair this trade is should I veto it" threads)... and yet, the poster didn't even SUGGEST vetoing this trade, because there was no collusion.I don't know who you are, Craven, but you get it. :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top