I just got offered a pretty bad one...
3. Jack Attack / Rosterbaters Trade Rejected
		 
		
	 
A lot of times people will jokingly say that they don't know which side of the deal is supposed to be the bad one, but in this case, I really have no idea which side of that deal is supposed to be the bad one. A lot of owners still have Gordon in their top 12. Those owners will consider it a ridiculously low price to acquire him. A lot of other owners have Gordon outside of their top 30. Those owners will consider it a ridiculous overpay for him. Since I don't know which side of the fence you fall on, I really have no idea which side of the trade you think is unfair (although, given that the offerer was giving Gordon, I'm assuming you fall on the low side of the fence and think it would be an overpay for him).
I've consistently been among the lowest Gordon rankers on the internet, but I have to admit, I actually have a team where I'd accept that offer right now (extremely deep at WR, with 6 top-20 receivers, so Gordon would have a much better chance of cracking my regular rotation than AJ and Wallace).