What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Whatcha readin now? (book, books, reading, read) (12 Viewers)

I got about 8 chapters into Angels and Demons a few years ago but didn't finish it cuz I only had it in eBook format. Now, with the movie coming out, I want to read it again.
Don't bother. It's awful.
Agreed. I wasted a few days reading that dreck.
Disagree completely, thought it was on par or better than DaVinci Code.
That is not a ringing endorsement at all for a bunch of people. I thought (and a number of others who frequent this thread) DaVinci Code was terrible.
 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm rereading The Great Jones Street by Don Delillo, mostly because I'm in a writing rut myself and nobody gets my engine running like Delillo.

 
Don't bother. It's awful.
Agreed. I wasted a few days reading that dreck.
Disagree completely, thought it was on par or better than DaVinci Code.
That is not a ringing endorsement at all for a bunch of people. I thought (and a number of others who frequent this thread) DaVinci Code was terrible.
The DaVinci Code isn't terrible for what it is.It's a page turner. It's a quick, easy read. If you're looking to think or be challenged by a book, look elsewhere. But if you're passing time (say, on a transpacific flight with nothing good on the entertainment system) it's perfectly fine; a nice guilty pleasure.Angels and Demons, however, sucked.Suspension of disbelief is one thing, but some of the crap the reader is asked to accept is just ridiculous. I came across this review:
Well, the book started with some promise, for a best seller in the adventure vein, but then the inaccuracies, clichés and unbelievable plot elements piled up until the ending landed with a soft plop in my lap.
I couldn't have said it better myself (although I probably would have stopped after "soft plop").
 
I got about 8 chapters into Angels and Demons a few years ago but didn't finish it cuz I only had it in eBook format. Now, with the movie coming out, I want to read it again.
Don't bother. It's awful.
Agreed. I wasted a few days reading that dreck.
Disagree completely, thought it was on par or better than DaVinci Code.
That is not a ringing endorsement at all for a bunch of people. I thought (and a number of others who frequent this thread) DaVinci Code was terrible.
:football: Didn't work for you (or a number of others who frequent this thread), it did for me.
 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.
I tried to like Morrison. Really, I did. I slogged through The Bluest Eye once in college and then again a couple of years ago, but I just couldn't get over the fact that I hated it. So okay, maybe it was just that one book. Well, it turned out that I hated Beloved too (even worse than Bluest Eye) and I also hated Sula. At this point, Morrison ran out of chances with me and I've happily ignored her ever after.

 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.
I tried to like Morrison. Really, I did. I slogged through The Bluest Eye once in college and then again a couple of years ago, but I just couldn't get over the fact that I hated it. So okay, maybe it was just that one book. Well, it turned out that I hated Beloved too (even worse than Bluest Eye) and I also hated Sula. At this point, Morrison ran out of chances with me and I've happily ignored her ever after.
The only Morrison book worth reading is Song of Solomon. It's a great book. The rest of her stuff is crap.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone here read The Best American Short Stories series? Every year a collection of the "best" short stories are bound together. 2007's was edited by Stephen King. I found those stories to be really depressing. Old people killing themselves and junk like that.

 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.
I tried to like Morrison. Really, I did. I slogged through The Bluest Eye once in college and then again a couple of years ago, but I just couldn't get over the fact that I hated it. So okay, maybe it was just that one book. Well, it turned out that I hated Beloved too (even worse than Bluest Eye) and I also hated Sula. At this point, Morrison ran out of chances with me and I've happily ignored her ever after.
The only Morrison book worth reading is Song of Solomon. It's a great book. The rest of her stuff is crap.
You've read all of her books? You must be a glutton for punishment -- reading 9 books by the same author and thinking that 8 of them are crap. I would have stopped after the 2nd, maybe 3rd crappy book.
 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.
I tried to like Morrison. Really, I did. I slogged through The Bluest Eye once in college and then again a couple of years ago, but I just couldn't get over the fact that I hated it. So okay, maybe it was just that one book. Well, it turned out that I hated Beloved too (even worse than Bluest Eye) and I also hated Sula. At this point, Morrison ran out of chances with me and I've happily ignored her ever after.
The only Morrison book worth reading is Song of Solomon. It's a great book. The rest of her stuff is crap.
You've read all of her books? You must be a glutton for punishment -- reading 9 books by the same author and thinking that 8 of them are crap. I would have stopped after the 2nd, maybe 3rd crappy book.
OK, I haven't read all nine. I am going to guess that I don't need to. Your results may vary.
 
I'm on a Toni Morrison binge right now and I'm loving every minute of it. If you've never read her or tried to read Beloved and hated it, I suggest you give her a chance. Song of Solomon, Sula, and The Bluest Eye are far better than Beloved, which I thought was pretty damn good. If you had to pick one, I'd go with Song of Solomon.
I tried to like Morrison. Really, I did. I slogged through The Bluest Eye once in college and then again a couple of years ago, but I just couldn't get over the fact that I hated it. So okay, maybe it was just that one book. Well, it turned out that I hated Beloved too (even worse than Bluest Eye) and I also hated Sula. At this point, Morrison ran out of chances with me and I've happily ignored her ever after.
The only Morrison book worth reading is Song of Solomon. It's a great book. The rest of her stuff is crap.
You've read all of her books? You must be a glutton for punishment -- reading 9 books by the same author and thinking that 8 of them are crap. I would have stopped after the 2nd, maybe 3rd crappy book.
OK, I haven't read all nine. I am going to guess that I don't need to. Your results may vary.
Which ones did you read that lead you to conclude that her stuff is crap?
 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Haven't read this, but keep meaning to. "Fatherland" by Robert Harris is good, a noir mystery that happens to be set in early 1960s Europe after Germany wins WWII. And if you like that, his book "Pompeii" is very good.
 
Just about finished with Fallen Founder: The Life of Aaron Burr by Nancy Isenberg. It's an interesting, detailed (400 pp) book that's quite pro-Burr. Lot of good information on the first few presidents, NY politics, Alexander Hamilton (of course), and the early development of the country.

 
The_Man said:
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Haven't read this, but keep meaning to. "Fatherland" by Robert Harris is good, a noir mystery that happens to be set in early 1960s Europe after Germany wins WWII. And if you like that, his book "Pompeii" is very good.
Just checked MIHC out of the government-run book exchange this afternoon. Hoping it is interesting/entertaining.Just finished Rough Weather by Robert Parker. Latest Spenser mystery. No one will ever accuse Parker of being literary, but he writes entertaining mysteries that can be digested in 2-3 evenings.

 
I've already recommended it earlier in the thread but I finished I would mention it again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shantaram_(novel)"</a>"]Shantaram. It is really an incredible book. It might be a little preachy/philosophical at times but the read is well worth it.
SO good. I still have Shantaram on my end table 5 years after reading it for the first time. Trying to figure out if enough time has passed for me to read it again. One of my favorite books ever.I've been hoping Roberts would put out another book, but it seems his time is occupied working on the Shantaram screenplay. No idea how they're going to make it into a movie, unless they do a four or five part series (prison escape, life in the slum, drug/gang involvement, war - maybe it's doable).

 
I just finished with The Forgotten Soldier, which is a (debated) autobiography of a German soldier on the Eastern Front in WWII. It made me appreciate my bed, my food, my clothes...just about everything.

 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Haven't read this, but keep meaning to. "Fatherland" by Robert Harris is good, a noir mystery that happens to be set in early 1960s Europe after Germany wins WWII. And if you like that, his book "Pompeii" is very good.
Just checked MIHC out of the government-run book exchange this afternoon. Hoping it is interesting/entertaining.Just finished Rough Weather by Robert Parker. Latest Spenser mystery. No one will ever accuse Parker of being literary, but he writes entertaining mysteries that can be digested in 2-3 evenings.
Penultimate Truth is a pretty good one as well.
 
:excited: Didn't work for you (or a number of others who frequent this thread), it did for me.
DVC was a good airplane read for me... not exactly coming away with anything worthwhile, but a good page-turning way of passing time.A&D was the exact same forumula, which got old fast... even on an airplane.
 
The only Morrison book worth reading is Song of Solomon. It's a great book. The rest of her stuff is crap.
You've read all of her books? You must be a glutton for punishment -- reading 9 books by the same author and thinking that 8 of them are crap. I would have stopped after the 2nd, maybe 3rd crappy book.
OK, I haven't read all nine. I am going to guess that I don't need to. Your results may vary.
Which ones did you read that lead you to conclude that her stuff is crap?
I've read The Bluest Eye, Sula and Beloved. Crap may have been a bit harsh. I'm a picky reader.
 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Haven't read this, but keep meaning to. "Fatherland" by Robert Harris is good, a noir mystery that happens to be set in early 1960s Europe after Germany wins WWII. And if you like that, his book "Pompeii" is very good.
Just checked MIHC out of the government-run book exchange this afternoon. Hoping it is interesting/entertaining.Just finished Rough Weather by Robert Parker. Latest Spenser mystery. No one will ever accuse Parker of being literary, but he writes entertaining mysteries that can be digested in 2-3 evenings.
No. No it isn't.
 
The Battle of the Hurtgen Forest

Just got this at the library for some light reading over the Easter vacation.

In September 1944, three months after the invasion of Normandy, the Allied armies prepared to push the German forces back into their homeland. Just south of the city of Aachen, elements of the U.S. First Army began an advance through the imposing Huertgen Forest. Instead of retreating, as the Allied command anticipated, the German troops prepared an elaborate defense of Huertgen, resulting in a struggle where tanks, infantry, and artillery dueled at close range. The battle for the forest ended abruptly in December, when a sudden German offensive through the Ardennes to the south forced the Allied armies to fall back, regroup, and start their attack again, this time culminating in the collapse of the Nazi regime in May 1945.

In The Battle of the Huertgen Forest, Charles B. MacDonald assesses this major American operation, discussing the opposing forces on the eve of the battle and offering a clearly written and well-documented history of the battle and the bitter consequences of the American move into the forest. Drawing on his own combat experience, MacDonald portrays both the American and the German troops with empathy and convincingly demonstrates the flaws in the American strategy. The book provides an insight into command decisions at both local and staff levels and the lessons that can be drawn from one of the bloodiest battles of World War II.

 
Netherland, by Joseph O'Neill.

This is the first non-parenting book I've read in almost 2 years and I was not disappointed. The prose in this is stunning and the story relevant (for me)- pre/post 9/11 immigrants' lives/relationships in and out of NYC. It got compared up and down to the Great Gatsby... obviously due to one of the main characters, but I don't remember the original enough to tell whether the writing compares.

I'd highly recommend this one if you're looking for a short, easy read that carries some emotional edge and does a great job conjuring a lot of the nerves and paranoia that hit NYC in those dark days (and linger).

 
In Search of Memory by Eric Kandel

just started it... very deft interweaving of autobiography, the history of brain/mind (cognitive) science in the 20th century & his own nobel-winning work on the physical basis of memory (making learning possible & knowledge/understanding in higher life forms) in organisms...

i think this might be one of the best & most well written scientific autobiographies i've ever encountered (the double helix was about a monumental event in the history of science & man's understanding of himself & nature - the discovery of DNA... but it was a bit dry at times... lewis thomas' lives of a cell would have to be among the best writing about biology in the past 30 years or so)...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm supposed to be reading Happiest Baby on the Block, Health Sleep Habits Healthy Child, and Touchpoints.

I'm reading Runnin' With the Big Dogs regarding the Texas-OU football rivarly. It's written by Mike Shropshire, who also wrote Seasons in Hell about the Texas Rangers baseball team in the 70s. It's decent enough filler in the non-football part of the year.

 
Just bought Canaan's Tongue by John Wray

http://www.amazon.com/Canaans-Tongue-John-Wray/dp/1400040868

Conflicted on this one and not sure if I'll like it. Love Twain's stuff on this time. Hate the slave stuff. We'll see.
2/3 through this. I imagine the Redeemer character as a cross between Ben Linus on Lost and Billy Barty in Foul Play.
How you liking it? I've been curious about it since JB posted it. I love Ben Linus...
finished, and i can't recommend it. latter third degenerates into nonsense and gobbledy####. there wasn't a single major character i cared about. it's so aggravating because Wray shows stretches of brilliance.
Thanks for the info. Disappointed to hear that, though. :goodposting:
Just finished Canaan's Tongue. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: I'm not sure what oso diablo is referring to by "gobbledy" but I thought it was brilliant. Yes, the narrative fractures toward the end, but I think that's intentional based on what Wray is trying to convey. It's a very well written book with very interesting characters and several good plot twists. This is the first from Wray that I've read, but I'll be looking for more.

The blurb on the back of my copy references "Faulkner, Morrison and Poe" - I can't disagree with this as Wray evokes each at various stages (and for the record, the Morrison being referred to is not the Lizard King; at least I don't think so ;) ).

 
I'm supposed to be reading Happiest Baby on the Block, Health Sleep Habits Healthy Child, and Touchpoints.

I'm reading Runnin' With the Big Dogs regarding the Texas-OU football rivarly. It's written by Mike Shropshire, who also wrote Seasons in Hell about the Texas Rangers baseball team in the 70s. It's decent enough filler in the non-football part of the year.
Definitely read that one... or at least skim it.
 
Just finished Greenspan's The Age of Turbulence (which was a great read). Trying to get back to Will Durant's History of Civilization. Bought the whole set about a year ago, but a major undertaking to try and get into them. Poor guy spent like 40 years putting it all together.

 
I just started Swan's Way by Proust.

I was inspired by the World's Greatest Draft, which exposed my lack of Proust reading once again.

For years my friends have threatened to revoke my "literary snob" membership card if I didn't read Proust.

So I'm finally giving in.

 
Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon Krakauer

Pretty interesting. A little on the opinionated side. And I definitely get the feeling that I would really not like Krakauer in real life. He comes across as a condescending jerk who writes well.

Into Thin Air is still far and away his best book.

 
I finished Lone Survivor which was recomended here. It was very good. Not to long ago I read the book by Pat Tillman's mother. I think it was called friendly fire. To me it is amazing the different feelings you get reading these two books. I dont know that I can put it into words. I almost felt like I was reading about two different wars. Both books moved me to tears.

Lone Survivor certainly left me with a better taste in my mouth regarding our armed forces and government. They were both good books and worth reading.

I am about 50 pages into The Story of Edgar Sawtelle and so far I like it.

I recently read The Shack. This was an ok book but I had some issues with it due to my religous beliefs.

 
I finished Lone Survivor which was recomended here. It was very good. Not to long ago I read the book by Pat Tillman's mother. I think it was called friendly fire. To me it is amazing the different feelings you get reading these two books. I dont know that I can put it into words. I almost felt like I was reading about two different wars. Both books moved me to tears.Lone Survivor certainly left me with a better taste in my mouth regarding our armed forces and government. They were both good books and worth reading.I am about 50 pages into The Story of Edgar Sawtelle and so far I like it.I recently read The Shack. This was an ok book but I had some issues with it due to my religous beliefs.
Also have read the Shack, and also have fairly strong beliefs. Care to elaborate?
 
I finished Lone Survivor which was recomended here. It was very good. Not to long ago I read the book by Pat Tillman's mother. I think it was called friendly fire. To me it is amazing the different feelings you get reading these two books. I dont know that I can put it into words. I almost felt like I was reading about two different wars. Both books moved me to tears.Lone Survivor certainly left me with a better taste in my mouth regarding our armed forces and government. They were both good books and worth reading.I am about 50 pages into The Story of Edgar Sawtelle and so far I like it.I recently read The Shack. This was an ok book but I had some issues with it due to my religous beliefs.
Also have read the Shack, and also have fairly strong beliefs. Care to elaborate?
It would be to much typing for me to elaborate and I would not be able to do my objections justice.I will say while I believe and know God may take any form he wants. I also believe there is a strong group of people that want to feminize the church. You see subtle changes in liturgy. Changing of words such as changing "men" to "people". (I am already messing up what I am trying to say)Anyway the portrayal of God as a woman set alarms off in my head. I realize the book goes on to state this was to change the characters preconceived notions and show God can show up however he wants. I still felt it was one of those subtle ways of trying to change beliefs.There were a few other instances that I had to ignore. I will say I liked the story and I bet a lot of people found help in it. Those are the most dangerous stories though. As I told a friend today. I liked the book but I would not recomend it to everyone. I think people without a strong knowledge in their faith could be mislead.* I am Catholic.
 
I finished Lone Survivor which was recomended here. It was very good. Not to long ago I read the book by Pat Tillman's mother. I think it was called friendly fire. To me it is amazing the different feelings you get reading these two books. I dont know that I can put it into words. I almost felt like I was reading about two different wars. Both books moved me to tears.Lone Survivor certainly left me with a better taste in my mouth regarding our armed forces and government. They were both good books and worth reading.I am about 50 pages into The Story of Edgar Sawtelle and so far I like it.I recently read The Shack. This was an ok book but I had some issues with it due to my religous beliefs.
Also have read the Shack, and also have fairly strong beliefs. Care to elaborate?
It would be to much typing for me to elaborate and I would not be able to do my objections justice.I will say while I believe and know God may take any form he wants. I also believe there is a strong group of people that want to feminize the church. You see subtle changes in liturgy. Changing of words such as changing "men" to "people". (I am already messing up what I am trying to say)Anyway the portrayal of God as a woman set alarms off in my head. I realize the book goes on to state this was to change the characters preconceived notions and show God can show up however he wants. I still felt it was one of those subtle ways of trying to change beliefs.There were a few other instances that I had to ignore. I will say I liked the story and I bet a lot of people found help in it. Those are the most dangerous stories though. As I told a friend today. I liked the book but I would not recomend it to everyone. I think people without a strong knowledge in their faith could be mislead.* I am Catholic.
Gotcha. I'm right there with you in being concerned about the feminization of the church. Obviously women are fantastic and a gift...the problem is that guys are absent and/or abdicating their leadership roles, and women are only to happy to fill the void. And I also was troubled by the portrayal of "The Father." Not so much in a dogmatic way, but more in the way that you describe. To be honest, I was also bothered that there seemed to be an overall dismissal of the danger and death of sin, as well as a hint of "God can be whatever you want him to be." If you do some studying of the author's background and Christian history, I think that's fairly apparent in his own belief system.To be fair, I did kind of enjoy the book, and it did make me think. The portrayal of the Holy Spirit was interesting and in a way eye-opening, and I was very convicted by the "courtroom in the woods" scene. Mostly I read it to be able to converse intelligently with friends who were reading it, and I'm glad I did so. But like you I wouldn't be quick to recommended it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has anyone read Steve Berry's work? I am currently reading The Romanov Prophecy and am having trouble getting into it, but was just wondering if anyone had any opinions.

 
I not an avid reader. I just finished reading Angel's and Demon's in preparation for the movie, and I came away very dissapointed. I thought that the DaVinci Code was far better and more interesting.

 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Very interesting premise. Just a piss-poor delivery. Went NOwhere.
 
Polished off a couple quick reads recently:

The Man in the High Castle by Phillip K. **** is an alternate history set in the US after an Axis victory in World War II. Like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? the nature of reality is a major theme in this book. A cool device that he uses is a novel within a novel wherein that novel is about an alternate history to that world, which imagines what would have happened had the Allies won.
Just read this. I wish I hadn't.
Really? It's on my short list of books to read. I've heard nothing but great stuff.Why didn't you like it?
Very interesting premise. Just a piss-poor delivery. Went NOwhere.
Concur.
 
I finished Lone Survivor which was recomended here. It was very good. Not to long ago I read the book by Pat Tillman's mother. I think it was called friendly fire. To me it is amazing the different feelings you get reading these two books. I dont know that I can put it into words. I almost felt like I was reading about two different wars. Both books moved me to tears.Lone Survivor certainly left me with a better taste in my mouth regarding our armed forces and government. They were both good books and worth reading.I am about 50 pages into The Story of Edgar Sawtelle and so far I like it.I recently read The Shack. This was an ok book but I had some issues with it due to my religous beliefs.
Also have read the Shack, and also have fairly strong beliefs. Care to elaborate?
It would be to much typing for me to elaborate and I would not be able to do my objections justice.I will say while I believe and know God may take any form he wants. I also believe there is a strong group of people that want to feminize the church. You see subtle changes in liturgy. Changing of words such as changing "men" to "people". (I am already messing up what I am trying to say)Anyway the portrayal of God as a woman set alarms off in my head. I realize the book goes on to state this was to change the characters preconceived notions and show God can show up however he wants. I still felt it was one of those subtle ways of trying to change beliefs.There were a few other instances that I had to ignore. I will say I liked the story and I bet a lot of people found help in it. Those are the most dangerous stories though. As I told a friend today. I liked the book but I would not recomend it to everyone. I think people without a strong knowledge in their faith could be mislead.* I am Catholic.
Gotcha. I'm right there with you in being concerned about the feminization of the church. Obviously women are fantastic and a gift...the problem is that guys are absent and/or abdicating their leadership roles, and women are only to happy to fill the void. And I also was troubled by the portrayal of "The Father." Not so much in a dogmatic way, but more in the way that you describe. To be honest, I was also bothered that there seemed to be an overall dismissal of the danger and death of sin, as well as a hint of "God can be whatever you want him to be." If you do some studying of the author's background and Christian history, I think that's fairly apparent in his own belief system.To be fair, I did kind of enjoy the book, and it did make me think. The portrayal of the Holy Spirit was interesting and in a way eye-opening, and I was very convicted by the "courtroom in the woods" scene. Mostly I read it to be able to converse intelligently with friends who were reading it, and I'm glad I did so. But like you I wouldn't be quick to recommended it.
Sounds like we are on the same page.
 
I'm not sure what oso diablo is referring to by "gobbledy" but I thought it was brilliant. Yes, the narrative fractures toward the end, but I think that's intentional based on what Wray is trying to convey. It's a very well written book with very interesting characters and several good plot twists. This is the first from Wray that I've read, but I'll be looking for more.

The blurb on the back of my copy references "Faulkner, Morrison and Poe" - I can't disagree with this as Wray evokes each at various stages (and for the record, the Morrison being referred to is not the Lizard King; at least I don't think so :mellow: ).
i guess one man's fractured plot is another man's gobbledy-guk (sic, to avoid the filter). I just watched The Departed, and its ending segments reminded me of how this book ended. (Though i do recommended the movie)
 
I'm not sure what oso diablo is referring to by "gobbledy" but I thought it was brilliant. Yes, the narrative fractures toward the end, but I think that's intentional based on what Wray is trying to convey. It's a very well written book with very interesting characters and several good plot twists. This is the first from Wray that I've read, but I'll be looking for more.

The blurb on the back of my copy references "Faulkner, Morrison and Poe" - I can't disagree with this as Wray evokes each at various stages (and for the record, the Morrison being referred to is not the Lizard King; at least I don't think so :hifive: ).
i guess one man's fractured plot is another man's gobbledy-guk (sic, to avoid the filter). I just watched The Departed, and its ending segments reminded me of how this book ended. (Though i do recommended the movie)
Hmmm, I don't recall being hit over the head with one of the most obvious and trite symbols ever used (i.e., the rat) at the end of Canaan's Tongue. Perhaps I missed something. :hey: ETA: I tried to use spoiler tags in case anyone hadn't seen the Departed, but the text didn't show.

:D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Next up: Dark Advent by Brian Hodge.

More post-apocalyptic fiction. I've read a bunch of reviews of this that say it's as good as The Stand and Swan Song. My expectations aren't that high, though.
As expected, not nearly as good as The Stand or Swan Song, but still pretty good. I'd say I liked it better than Lucifer's Hammer. Prose was pretty decent for a horror/thriller at the beginning, reminded me a little of Dan Simmons, but got rather pedestrian once the action picked up.7/10

Weird thing is the cover has absolutely nothing to do with the story. :goodposting:

Next up: Going After Cacciato by Tim O'Brien

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top