What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Whatever guys, thread open. (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also, here's another freebie pick:

NHUR ($0.0805 a share)
This thing trades about $10,000 worth a day... So while someone buying 1000 shares might makes $25 dollars if they get caught on the right side of the pump, real money gets swallowed like Linda Lovelace...You need to be very careful with these unregulated pink sheets - You'll get crushed - they're usually fake companies set up to be pumped by newsletters, sell their shares when they go up, & then a group of suckers left holding the bag...

Looking at HEMP, I've been debating opening my own marijuana company
Is this legal? Seems like a great scheme if you know an insider.
Did you not see The Wolf of Wall Street?The wolf is the guy selling you the HEMP shares.
Whoa, I need to watch this.

 
Just checking in on the thread, I see we're pushing right on through any potential liquidity concerns and right on into margin trading.

Em, when everyone tells you airlines are the way to go, don't listen - it's all about potatoes, GB.
Could you explain this a bit? If there's some major flaw in my thinking, I'd love the heads-up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqYNju5t4qw
http://www.hulu.com/watch/440725

I think my link is better than your link.

 
Just checking in on the thread, I see we're pushing right on through any potential liquidity concerns and right on into margin trading.

Em, when everyone tells you airlines are the way to go, don't listen - it's all about potatoes, GB.
Could you explain this a bit? If there's some major flaw in my thinking, I'd love the heads-up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqYNju5t4qw
http://www.hulu.com/watch/440725

I think my link is better than your link.
Will check this out. Love a good crash and burn stock market sitcom.

 
Keep the deletion talk in another thread... Seriously, bad shtick, who gives a #### what some randoms on the internet think.

You got a good thing going here - You want to miss out on earning tens of dollars by getting this thread deleted.

 
UPDATE, FEBRUARY 6TH:

Well fellas, I'm back.

Turns out life is pretty boring when you've only got two close friends, you work 40+ hours a week, and you go to school full-time. I
Yes. Yes, it is. You know what's fun, though? Sitting in your own house, having a good job and money in the bank, and looking back and thinking "Wow. A couple of years of being bored and working hard got me all this!"

Now stop gambling.

 
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.

 
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
This sounds like a topic for a different thread. You should start one.

 
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.

 
and we are offf....

first off if you feel like you were being "flamed" you have no idea what being attacked really is...

secondly you dont need a rationale. sack up why do you give a #### if others are talking about you somewhere else. you dont think this happens after you leave work?

grow the #### up man....

### #### it i got :fished:

 
Also, I'm not sure of your use of "slander" in this instance.

Though there may be an issue with false light invasion of privacy in some instances for things on that board.

 
Eminence said:
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
FYI. Not eloquent.

 
Eminence said:
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
Congrats? :shrug:

 
Eminence said:
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
This is not true.

It's a "who is the second biggest loser?" contest. No matter how hard you keep trying, you'll never beat the sheer stupidity and obliviousness exhibited by MoP.

 
Look at the FAQ's genius....amazing to think that internet people go to more than one discussion board....mind blown!

 
Henry Ford said:
Eminence said:
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.
Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.

 
Henry Ford said:
Eminence said:
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.
Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.
I don't know what you're talking about, but disallowing someone in your employ from posting on another message board seems like it's more involvement than most business owners take in their employees' lives.

And let's be honest, the people who post on the other board about this board probably post a huge amount here and drive a lot of forum traffic. Which means money for a message board/website.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has to be an Em shtick bc I can't see anyone caring that much... I just sent a PM to DSP with a link to that board :thumbup:

He will either fly off the deep end here or head over there.

 
And let's be honest, the people who post on the other board about this board probably post a huge amount here and drive a lot of forum traffic. Which means money for a message board/website.
This is completely false... 20-30 people posting on a free board make FBG zero dollars. I bet most of them aren't even subscribers.

The only money being made on this particluar board is showing advertisements at a rate of like $1 dollar per every 1000 impressions viewed.

 
Henry Ford said:
Eminence said:
Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.

This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,

"There was legitimate stock discussion."

Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.

Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.

However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.

Can I get the rationale behind this?

You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?

Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.
Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.
I don't know what you're talking about, but disallowing someone in your employ from posting on another message board seems like it's more involvement than most business owners take in their employees' lives.

And let's be honest, the people who post on the other board about this board probably post a huge amount here and drive a lot of forum traffic. Which means money for a message board/website.
Wasn't suggesting that, IMO they should end the employment contract of the mod, since one would not expect him to be also posting under an alias that is not disclosed on this forum.

 
What exactly are you talking about here squisition? What mod is posting under an unknown alias?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top