fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Boiler Room is the same kind of deal, both good flicks to learn how this works via the phone.
Beat me to it!!
Beat me to it!!
On ipad series, sorry"Serious" seven?
Whoa, I need to watch this.Did you not see The Wolf of Wall Street?The wolf is the guy selling you the HEMP shares.Is this legal? Seems like a great scheme if you know an insider.This thing trades about $10,000 worth a day... So while someone buying 1000 shares might makes $25 dollars if they get caught on the right side of the pump, real money gets swallowed like Linda Lovelace...You need to be very careful with these unregulated pink sheets - You'll get crushed - they're usually fake companies set up to be pumped by newsletters, sell their shares when they go up, & then a group of suckers left holding the bag...Also, here's another freebie pick:
NHUR ($0.0805 a share)
Looking at HEMP, I've been debating opening my own marijuana company
http://www.hulu.com/watch/440725http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqYNju5t4qwCould you explain this a bit? If there's some major flaw in my thinking, I'd love the heads-up.Just checking in on the thread, I see we're pushing right on through any potential liquidity concerns and right on into margin trading.
Em, when everyone tells you airlines are the way to go, don't listen - it's all about potatoes, GB.
Will check this out. Love a good crash and burn stock market sitcom.http://www.hulu.com/watch/440725http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqYNju5t4qwCould you explain this a bit? If there's some major flaw in my thinking, I'd love the heads-up.Just checking in on the thread, I see we're pushing right on through any potential liquidity concerns and right on into margin trading.
Em, when everyone tells you airlines are the way to go, don't listen - it's all about potatoes, GB.
I think my link is better than your link.
HARD DELETE!Baaaad move, FBG.
Just keep exercising those 1st Amendment rights.Baaaad move, FBG.
A/S/L?This thread always gets me hard![]()
"You see, I'm 23 years old and I'm being cyber-bullied.""The People You Work With I Will Probably Sue Them Too. Sue Everybody."
Yes. Yes, it is. You know what's fun, though? Sitting in your own house, having a good job and money in the bank, and looking back and thinking "Wow. A couple of years of being bored and working hard got me all this!"UPDATE, FEBRUARY 6TH:
Well fellas, I'm back.
Turns out life is pretty boring when you've only got two close friends, you work 40+ hours a week, and you go to school full-time. I
This sounds like a topic for a different thread. You should start one.Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
EMERGENCY MEETING!Also, I'm not sure of your use of "slander" in this instance.
Though there may be an issue with false light invasion of privacy in some instances for things on that board.
FYI. Not eloquent.Eminence said:Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
Congrats?Eminence said:Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
This is not true.Eminence said:Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.Henry Ford said:My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.Eminence said:Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
I don't know what you're talking about, but disallowing someone in your employ from posting on another message board seems like it's more involvement than most business owners take in their employees' lives.Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.Henry Ford said:My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.Eminence said:Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
Of what group?EMERGENCY MEETING!Also, I'm not sure of your use of "slander" in this instance.
Though there may be an issue with false light invasion of privacy in some instances for things on that board.
This is completely false... 20-30 people posting on a free board make FBG zero dollars. I bet most of them aren't even subscribers.And let's be honest, the people who post on the other board about this board probably post a huge amount here and drive a lot of forum traffic. Which means money for a message board/website.
ALL OF 'EM!!Of what group?EMERGENCY MEETING!Also, I'm not sure of your use of "slander" in this instance.
Though there may be an issue with false light invasion of privacy in some instances for things on that board.
Wasn't suggesting that, IMO they should end the employment contract of the mod, since one would not expect him to be also posting under an alias that is not disclosed on this forum.I don't know what you're talking about, but disallowing someone in your employ from posting on another message board seems like it's more involvement than most business owners take in their employees' lives.Can't dislike it too much, otherwise they wouldn't allow a moderator here to post both as a mod and also under an alias (sometimes talking to one another in the same thread) and then brag about it on the board that shall not be named.Henry Ford said:My understanding is that the owner of this board dislikes that board tremendously, and any overt mentions of it (and certainly any links to it) are deleted immediately. If it's nothing but a thread about that board, the whole thread gets the axe.Eminence said:Let me eloquently put this, this thread got to a point where 10-15 users were flaming me at once.
This was uncomfortable for me and I asked for a HARD delete of my thread. I was refused because,
"There was legitimate stock discussion."
Now, another poster posted a thread revealing a sister board to this site where others mock and directly quote others from this site.
Even holding what is essentially, "Who is the biggest loser?" contests. Where myself and the OP of the other thread are squarely in the semi-finals.
However, the thread revealing that the "cool kids" from FBG have been slandering users who post here has been deleted.
Can I get the rationale behind this?
You would think the existence of a website that promotes the very ridicule I was trying to stop to begin with, should be public knowledge?
Moreso than the "stock discussion" found in this thread.
And let's be honest, the people who post on the other board about this board probably post a huge amount here and drive a lot of forum traffic. Which means money for a message board/website.
It took me years before I could tell Jayrok & Jayrod apart. And don't even get me started about Cheese & No Cheese.Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
WTF... I thought Aaron = MoP?Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
And IWKS...It took me years before I could tell Jayrok & Jayrod apart. And don't even get me started about Cheese & No Cheese.Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
Interesting.WTF... I thought Aaron = MoP?Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
Yes they are.Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
Yes they are.Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.
Good point. I've never seen them in the same room, so plausible, I guess?Yes they are.Fyi: rudnicki and raider nation are not the same person. Its confusing, I know.