What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

When's the right time to bolster your starting lineup? (1 Viewer)

gianmarco

Footballguy
So, many of us are in multiple leagues and will run trade offers or ideas by other FF'ers. It seems lately I've been hearing quite a few where owners are already looking to trade depth on an already strong team to make them unstoppable. I started thinking about this and wondered if this is really wise. I think a large part of these is boredom and anxiousness to get started as I really don't think now is the right time for a few reasons.

It's one thing if you have a borderline team right now and want to put together a contender. It's another thing when your team is already strong and likely playoff-bound (I know it's early to sometimes tell and things change and change quickly, but you know what I mean).

1. Trading away solid depth too early (like now) on a strong team that has a good chance to make a playoff run is a recipe for disaster. A couple of ACL's and a hammy later and you're really wishing you had that depth to ride you through the storm. Ask owners who had S. Jackson and A. Johnson last year. EVERYONE gets hit by the injury bug sooner or later in FF. And there is just no way to predict it no matter how much we like to throw around the injury-prone label. Just because you have a set of guys that has missed relatively no time is not a guarantee for anything. Not to mention underproduction. Depth is what will carry you through so that you can still make the playoffs.

2. Yes, having a monster lineup and being feared by others in your league is fun and exciting, I guess. However, with the exception of seeding and a possible bye, it doesn't matter if you make the playoffs scoring 150/week or 100/week. Those of you who are in pursuit of that monster team, if your team is likely to make the playoffs anyway, you're almost trading for only 2-3 weeks of this year. I know this is in terms of a dynasty and you have to look long term as well, but in regards to "going for it all this year", this is a point that I think many overlook. Sure it's nice to upgrade your #3 WR from J. Cotchery to S. Smith, but in the end, during the 2-3 weeks you're fighting for the championship, Cotchery can just as easily put up a big game as Smith can. Over the course of a season, my money is definitely on Smith, but on a particular 2-3 week stretch, is it really worth the smaller % of difference to give up valuable depth?

3. Depth has different value now than mid-season. I know it's nice to look at your huge stable of RB's and know that you've got some great trade bait and want to upgrade that WR. What some forget is that that same stable of RB's will have much more value midseason when teams have lost their RB's and are in dire need of one. Those same RB's have now gained even more value simply by waiting. Not to mention that you are keeping other teams from getting stronger and challenging you. Or worst of all, when YOU'RE the one that is now in need and you're paying a higher price than what you sold a few months earlier.

None of this is meant to say not to trade or improve your lineup or pass up good value. Dynasty teams are improved oftentimes by making small moves to gain value one step at a time. But, at the same time, I think it's wise to consider if now is the right time to make certain moves when it involves using your depth to bolster an already strong lineup.

 
:shrug:

Some owners can be trigger happy, always looking for the deal around the corner and making offers just to shake things up. But, that can also be one of the aspects of managing a dynasty team they enjoy most. I don't think the time of year/season is really the issue (i.e. boredom setting in post NFL draft and before TC).

That said, IMO anytime you can find a deal that improves your team - and the cost of doing business isn't prohibitive (giving up solid prospects for backups/RB3s) then why not? Though owners often tend to over value their players which can make trading more challenging. And there's always a blend of teams in dynasty leagues - contenders vs. playoff hopefuls and then re-builders.

As you mentioned, when YOU are in a bad spot and looking for injury replacements mid-season, the other owners will of course be in a better negotiation position. Honestly it's tough to plan forward more than 2-3 years in dynasty, and roster limitations typically play into the ability to manage a bench effectively. Considering how fast the league changes, I don't see much value in having >>> WR6 when your RB3 would likely lose you games when forced into a 'starting' role due to injury.

IMO - it's more about how accurate your own prognostication skills are, and taking advantage of trading your hype players vs. real prospects. That's where you can add value. Then dealing from a better position than the other owner when possible.

A good example of this was a offer I passed on last month - where I would have given J Campbell / S Rice / L Robinson for B Jacobs & DeAngelo Williams. W/ MJD as my RB2 and serioius ?s @ RB3 it was tempting - but I couldn't sacrafice the WR prospects for Jacobs. And my team actually won the 1st year championship last season.

 
1. Trading away solid depth too early (like now) on a strong team that has a good chance to make a playoff run is a recipe for disaster.
I think it depends who you are trading for. Are you trading for someone like Fitz, who will be a staple of your team for years? I just (kind of) did this (got AJ instead of Fitz). I traded my RB3 (K Smith) and some other depth (plus some 09's) for AJ and some lesser depth back.I thinned out my team pretty good (L Washington is now my RB3). But I picked up AJ to add to Boldin and Cotchery (with Battle as wr4). That's a nice wr group to start every week, and worth the price I paid. I think it also matters if you are cuffed - I have Jax and Jacobs as my Rb1 and 2. But they are fully cuffed, so if someone gets hurt (particularly Jacobs), I may not need the RB3 anyway. In the end, depth is easier to get than studs. So I would agree with you if you aren't getting a stud back - then it's not worth it. But I'll trade depth for a stud almost every time.
 
In general, I agree. No team is unstoppable, and some owners just want to do something with thir team-- so they trade.

But in some cases it makes sense. Trading depth/starters for a guy like Peyton or Brady (who have a good chance to continue their habit of playing all 16 games) wouldn't hurt much because you don't really need to back them up. But in most cases I think boredom is playing the role of GM in July.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top