hutchins929
Footballguy
Which of the 11 teams that are 2-0 are the best?
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Which of the 2-0 teams is the best? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter hutchins929
- Start date
As a Bear's fan, I'm making sure my calendar is clear for Feb 4. 
Fantaholic
Footballguy
Voted Baltimore, but Jax could sway me with a win in Indy this week.
Tough not to like what Baltimore has done so far this year. Their defense looks to be back where they were in recent years, which puts them up there with any defense in the league bar none.
They've got their Trent Dilfer back in Steve Mcnair. Only Mcnair is better, but he is the veteran presence that will not lose games for you and to top it off his career favorite receiver is on the team as well.
Jamal looks like he could be regaining some of his prior form, and they've got talent to back him up.
Sounds an aweful lot like the team that one the super bowl a few years back.
If Jacksonville handily beats Indy at home this week however, it will be very difficult to argue against them.
The rest of the teams simply have not proven enough to this point after two games.
Tough not to like what Baltimore has done so far this year. Their defense looks to be back where they were in recent years, which puts them up there with any defense in the league bar none.
They've got their Trent Dilfer back in Steve Mcnair. Only Mcnair is better, but he is the veteran presence that will not lose games for you and to top it off his career favorite receiver is on the team as well.
Jamal looks like he could be regaining some of his prior form, and they've got talent to back him up.
Sounds an aweful lot like the team that one the super bowl a few years back.
If Jacksonville handily beats Indy at home this week however, it will be very difficult to argue against them.
The rest of the teams simply have not proven enough to this point after two games.
Bob Loblaw
Footballguy
I voted for SD, but thought about voting for ATL. Both of their running games are sick. There were two reasons I voted for SD: I am an LT owner, and SD doesn't have Morten Anderson on their roster. It's just hard voting for a team as the BEST team when they have a 46 yr old kicker.
Baltimore is good, but they've played TB and Oakland, both are 0-2. Granted, they dominated them, but I'd like to see what happens after they play a better team.
Jax's DEF is really good, but there offense isn't. They need to utilize their basketball player receivers better. Would they really lose in a jumpball situation?
Chicago and Indy don't have a running game (I am also a Rhodes owner).
The other teams are good, just not the best.
Baltimore is good, but they've played TB and Oakland, both are 0-2. Granted, they dominated them, but I'd like to see what happens after they play a better team.
Jax's DEF is really good, but there offense isn't. They need to utilize their basketball player receivers better. Would they really lose in a jumpball situation?
Chicago and Indy don't have a running game (I am also a Rhodes owner).
The other teams are good, just not the best.
Harry Beanbag
Sausage King of Chicago
I guess by this thought process the showdown between Baltimore and San Diego in Week 4 looms large.
