None of them. Think they're all in for down seasons. If I had to rate themUbaldoLatosGallardoLirianoDempster
I'd probably flip flop Latos and Gallardo but they're in a pretty close tier. Both are well under Jimenez. I would steer clear of trading for Liriano and Dempster but if they were on the waiver wire and I had a free spot, I'd take a flyerNone of them. Think they're all in for down seasons. If I had to rate themUbaldoLatosGallardoLirianoDempster![]()
87 mph fastball/81 mph change baffling the Sux tonight? I liked your earlier list, but Ubaldo is well above the others IMO. Latos off to a rough start again tonight, I just traded for him too.Still don't like him![]()
id still buy gallardo at .50/1.00Yeah, I'd definitely snag any of them if the cost was free (or virtually free). I just wouldn't go after any of these guys as anything more than a throw in or burning a ww claim.
just offered the guy torii hunter and j garcia for gallardo. thats 50cents right?id still buy gallardo at .50/1.00Yeah, I'd definitely snag any of them if the cost was free (or virtually free). I just wouldn't go after any of these guys as anything more than a throw in or burning a ww claim.
Liriano looks really, really bad. I would stay away.
Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.As for the list. Im concerned about Ubaldo's drop in velocity. The first start back from the DL he picked it back to about last year's level, but then it slid again in his next start. Latos is also down about 2 MPH off his 4 seamer from last year and over 1 mph from his 2 seamer - which he's currently throwing significantly less.Liriano, I think has serious problems despite last night's effort. His K and BB rates are both going in the wrong direction and the weird thing is that he seems to have traded his 2 seamer for a 4 seamer. That shold increase strikeouts and velocity, instead both have fallen.Gallardo has been using his slider more, but in general it looks like a sample size issue and also the realization that he's probably never taking that next step. It just doesn't look like he's ever going to get more control.I think Dempster is mainly a sample size issue as well. His HR/flyball rate is ridiculously high and most of his underlying stats are fairly similar to last season, though he has changed his pitch selection some which bears watching.Now, its worth noting that its fairly common for velocities to start the season down. In general, pitchers build up strength over the course of the season, but 2 mph is a big deal so its something to keep an eye on.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
Here's what I can prove. I know what practices I follow when it comes to drafting arms and a significant workload increase is something that I try to avoid when drafting my teams.Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
First off, these are all extremely small samples. Second, most of those guys outperformed their peripherals last season.Here's what I can prove. I know what practices I follow when it comes to drafting arms and a significant workload increase is something that I try to avoid when drafting my teams.Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
Right now, at least for this season, this is looking like a pretty wise thing to do.
For the sake of argument, let's use this year's Verducci list....
Madison Bumgarner, SF - 4.75 ERA / 1.52 WHIP / K rate stable
Alex Sanabia, Fla. - Strained forearm. Hasn't pitched this year
Matt Latos, SD - 4.55 ERA / 1.30 WHIP / K rate up
David Price, TB - 3.95 ERA / 1.27 WHIP / K rate down more than 1.5 per 9
Brandon Beachy, Atl. - Looks good, improving. But small sample for 2010. 3.47 ERA / 0.99 WHIP / K rate stable
Phil Hughes, NYY - Do I even need to put numbers down here? Plus he's hurt
Gio Gonzalez, Oak. - Looks good, 2.70 ERA / 1.34 WHIP / K rate slightly up
Brett Cecil, Tor. - 6.86 ERA / 1.67 WHIP / K rate up
Dillon Gee, NYM - Only threw 33 MLB innings last year, but his ERA is up / WHIP is stable / K rate up
Travis Wood, Cin - 6.82 ERA / 1.55 WHIP / K rate stable
Ivan Nova, NYY - 5.14 ERA / 1.61 WHIP / K Rate stable
About 1/5 of the way through the season and 8 of 11 pitchers are showing signs of regression or have fallen flat on their face. Only one (Beachy) has improved. Gio looks stable. I don't really know how to classify Gee. I guess you could call him stable.
Do these guys have a chance to improve throughout the year? Of course they do. But if I drafted these guys, I'm saddled with arms that have value that less than what I got them for on draft day.
hes been pretty good his last 2 outingsHere's what I can prove. I know what practices I follow when it comes to drafting arms and a significant workload increase is something that I try to avoid when drafting my teams.Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
Right now, at least for this season, this is looking like a pretty wise thing to do.
For the sake of argument, let's use this year's Verducci list....
Madison Bumgarner, SF - 4.75 ERA / 1.52 WHIP / K rate stable
First: To be honest, I don't care about the size of the sample. If I got these guys on draft day, I'm more than likely f'ed today based on their current values / performances. It's really that plain and simple. I avoided each and every one of them and guess what, I'm not f'ed.Second: Most of those peripherals you're saying they outperformed are from small sample sizes if not non-existent samples. I mean are you really telling me that Travis Wood outperformed his peripherals? You can't have it both ways.First off, these are all extremely small samples. Second, most of those guys outperformed their peripherals last season.Here's what I can prove. I know what practices I follow when it comes to drafting arms and a significant workload increase is something that I try to avoid when drafting my teams.Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
Right now, at least for this season, this is looking like a pretty wise thing to do.
For the sake of argument, let's use this year's Verducci list....
Madison Bumgarner, SF - 4.75 ERA / 1.52 WHIP / K rate stable
Alex Sanabia, Fla. - Strained forearm. Hasn't pitched this year
Matt Latos, SD - 4.55 ERA / 1.30 WHIP / K rate up
David Price, TB - 3.95 ERA / 1.27 WHIP / K rate down more than 1.5 per 9
Brandon Beachy, Atl. - Looks good, improving. But small sample for 2010. 3.47 ERA / 0.99 WHIP / K rate stable
Phil Hughes, NYY - Do I even need to put numbers down here? Plus he's hurt
Gio Gonzalez, Oak. - Looks good, 2.70 ERA / 1.34 WHIP / K rate slightly up
Brett Cecil, Tor. - 6.86 ERA / 1.67 WHIP / K rate up
Dillon Gee, NYM - Only threw 33 MLB innings last year, but his ERA is up / WHIP is stable / K rate up
Travis Wood, Cin - 6.82 ERA / 1.55 WHIP / K rate stable
Ivan Nova, NYY - 5.14 ERA / 1.61 WHIP / K Rate stable
About 1/5 of the way through the season and 8 of 11 pitchers are showing signs of regression or have fallen flat on their face. Only one (Beachy) has improved. Gio looks stable. I don't really know how to classify Gee. I guess you could call him stable.
Do these guys have a chance to improve throughout the year? Of course they do. But if I drafted these guys, I'm saddled with arms that have value that less than what I got them for on draft day.
Third, regression should be the expected outcome. Regression to the mean is the logical explanation for pitchers with career years failing back to Earth. Not some mythical 30 inning increase for pitchers under 25.
Finally, injury rates for starters are ridiculously high. Anywhere from 25-50% depending on age and injury history. 2 out of 11 on the self is entirely inline with expectations.
The Verducci Effect has been studied many times, and each time the studies showed no observed effect. The premise was derived from anecdotal evidence and persists due to selective memory.
youre logged into the wrong account, finThere's more than a few titles out there with my name on it and I know it's because of my practices when it comes to drafting arms. So like I said from the get go. I don't care what you think. I KNOW what works for me.
I blame the drugs.youre logged into the wrong account, finThere's more than a few titles out there with my name on it and I know it's because of my practices when it comes to drafting arms. So like I said from the get go. I don't care what you think. I KNOW what works for me.
We should just leave it at that.'Limp Ditka said:So like I said from the get go. I don't care to think. I KNOW what works for me.
how long can you keep? at what cost?'BigA said:I was offered carlos santana for Ubaldo. 10 team keeper league.
keep as long as you want no costhow long can you keep? at what cost?'BigA said:I was offered carlos santana for Ubaldo. 10 team keeper league.
do it, hes a mauer type catcher talent. another pitcher will come alongkeep as long as you want no costhow long can you keep? at what cost?'BigA said:I was offered carlos santana for Ubaldo. 10 team keeper league.
About 2/3 of the way through the season, there's a whole lot of bad here.Madison Bumgarner, SFG - 3.80 ERA / 1.30 WHIP / K rate upHere's what I can prove. I know what practices I follow when it comes to drafting arms and a significant workload increase is something that I try to avoid when drafting my teams.Its not what I think. Its what I can prove, and what you can't.Thought Latos had the Verducci Effect written all over him (Hi dpark, don't care what you think).
Right now, at least for this season, this is looking like a pretty wise thing to do.
For the sake of argument, let's use this year's Verducci list....
Madison Bumgarner, SF - 4.75 ERA / 1.52 WHIP / K rate stable
Alex Sanabia, Fla. - Strained forearm. Hasn't pitched this year
Matt Latos, SD - 4.55 ERA / 1.30 WHIP / K rate up
David Price, TB - 3.95 ERA / 1.27 WHIP / K rate down more than 1.5 per 9
Brandon Beachy, Atl. - Looks good, improving. But small sample for 2010. 3.47 ERA / 0.99 WHIP / K rate stable
Phil Hughes, NYY - Do I even need to put numbers down here? Plus he's hurt
Gio Gonzalez, Oak. - Looks good, 2.70 ERA / 1.34 WHIP / K rate slightly up
Brett Cecil, Tor. - 6.86 ERA / 1.67 WHIP / K rate up
Dillon Gee, NYM - Only threw 33 MLB innings last year, but his ERA is up / WHIP is stable / K rate up
Travis Wood, Cin - 6.82 ERA / 1.55 WHIP / K rate stable
Ivan Nova, NYY - 5.14 ERA / 1.61 WHIP / K Rate stable
About 1/5 of the way through the season and 8 of 11 pitchers are showing signs of regression or have fallen flat on their face. Only one (Beachy) has improved. Gio looks stable. I don't really know how to classify Gee. I guess you could call him stable.
Do these guys have a chance to improve throughout the year? Of course they do. But if I drafted these guys, I'm saddled with arms that have value that less than what I got them for on draft day.
Its actually just the belief that pithers under 25 that had a 30+ innings jump will regress. Well, duh. Its totally baseless. Look at that list above, he's somehow claiming that 3 of 11 young pitchers injured is out of proportion with the rest of the league and that 4 out of 10 regressing in rate stats is evidence of some correlation between jumping 30+ innings for pitchers under 25 and regression in performance. Its not. Every rigorous study has failed to find any such correlation. Its just the expected regression for guys that had just had career highs in IP.It's the belief pitchers who make too big a jump in innings pitched from one year to the next are liable to get hurt. At least that's my understanding.