Dedfin
Footballguy
GOATOATIf you're going to be a two words all time, it should either be GOAT OAT or GOAT of AT.
GOATOATIf you're going to be a two words all time, it should either be GOAT OAT or GOAT of AT.
Still redundant tho. lolIf you're going to be a two words all time, it should either be GOAT OAT or GOAT of AT.
Yeah, and Rd 3 Mike McKenzie......same draft in which I was making my point.1999
Rd 1 Antuan Edwards DB
Rd 2 Fred Vinson DB
To be fair, between 1990-1997, Packers used 1st or 2nd round picks on DBs 6 out of those 8 years.Yeah, and Rd 3 Mike McKenzie......same draft in which I was making my point.
Fair enough. However, using your 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the same draft sends a pretty direct objective. They were doing everything they could to stop Moss.To be fair, between 1990-1997, Packers used 1st or 2nd round picks on DBs 6 out of those 8 years.
I do not agree that Moss's 2007 season is "almost as impressive" as Rice's entire career and all of the records he set, which is what you say here.Rice played most of his career with hall of fame quarterbacks including the best quarterback in the history of the game up to that point and set almost every receiving record there is.
But almost as impressive is that in one season with Brady, Moss immediately set the single season touchdown record and helped Brady do the same. From randy hey nice to meet you I'm tom to 18-1 with the highest scoring offense in nfl history in 9 months.
I don't believe this is true, but I am interested in hearing how you define their primes. What years would you characterize as primes for each of them?Rice's prime was longer, Moss's was better.
You are making an implicit assumption that Rice would be the exact same if he was starting today as when he was starting in 1985. I think that is a faulty premise. His work ethic is renowned, and training methods are better today. College passing offenses are also better today. He would be a better player entering the NFL now than he was then, when he was the 16th pick in the first round.Not for 1 game. Starting fresh today, to begin a career.
You would draft several WRs ahead of him starting over today. In that way, I don't think there is any doubt several of the freaks we have seen over the last 20 years would be considered better players.
I’d have to go back and look again, but we know Moss’s best season was 2007 and that Rice’s 1995 season matched/exceeded it. And as you pointed out, totally forgot this one, but 1987 needs to be up there as well.I do not agree that Moss's 2007 season is "almost as impressive" as Rice's entire career and all of the records he set, which is what you say here.
First of all, as others have mentioned, if we focus on regular season only, Rice's 1987 season of 1129 YFS and 23 TDs in 12 games (due to a strike) is more impressive than Moss's 2007 season of 98/1493/23 in 16 games. Rice had 23 of his team's 55 offensive TDs in 1987, compared to Moss's 23 of 67 offensive TDs.
More importantly, we should include the postseason in this discussion. Including the postseason, Moss had 105/1587/24 receiving plus 1/14/0 rushing in 19 games in 2007 with GOAT Brady at QB and GOAT Belichick at HC. He had 5/62/1 receiving in the Super Bowl, and his team lost.
IMO Rice had two seasons that were more impressive, all things considered:
Montana and Young are clearly among the best QBs of all time, but Brady > Montana > Young. And there is no comparison of head coaches... Belichick >>>>>>>>>> Seifert.
- In 1989, Rice had 101/1800/22 receiving and 5/33/0 rushing in 19 games with Montana/Young at QB and Siefert at HC. He had 7/148/3 in the Super Bowl, and his team won.
- In 1994, Rice had 128/1732/17 receiving and 8/103/2 rushing in 19 games with Young at QB and Siefert at HC. He had 10/149/3 in the Super Bowl, and his team won.
So peak season discussion goes to Rice, as does most every other form of comparison.
I don't believe this is true, but I am interested in hearing how you define their primes. What years would you characterize as primes for each of them?
No way in hell I’m taking anyone over Rice. All great receivers you named and none of them should be picked ahead of Rice today.Most productive versus Best.
Not the same imo.
If you were drafting WRs, even knowing Rice's career - you are taking several more recent players over him. Moss, Calvin, Julio for no brainer starters.
"Closer"? Consecutive top pick DBs in 3 of 4 years isn't close?If you can show me something closer to ‘99, I might agree with you.
Do you really think they do that if the Vikings didn't also have Chris Carter?Fair enough. However, using your 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the same draft sends a pretty direct objective. They were doing everything they could to stop Moss.
This...Rice played most of his career with hall of fame quarterbacks including the best quarterback in the history of the game up to that point and set almost every receiving record there is.
But almost as impressive is that in one season with Brady, Moss immediately set the single season touchdown record and helped Brady do the same. From randy hey nice to meet you I'm tom to 18-1 with the highest scoring offense in nfl history in 9 months.
As impressive as Rice's records are - and it's incredible that so many have survived not only this passing era but the longer seasons - maybe the most impressive thing he did was come back from an ACL injury and play again the same season. And he scored a touchdown.
Rice's prime was longer, Moss's was better. If Moss had worked as hard as rice he could have passed him. He didn't. The answer is rice
Yes...comparing what they did 15 years later is meaningless they me. If it was “closer” as in the 1-2 years before or after, it would be relevant."Closer"? Consecutive top pick DBs in 3 of 4 years isn't close?
Zero chance anyone can answer that with any certainty. Arguing hypotheticals is impossible.Do you really think they do that if the Vikings didn't also have Chris Carter?
Didn't say anything about Fitz, Carter, or Harrison. Elite WR's existed before Jerry Rice. Don Hutson and Lance Alworth are unquestionably better than Moss(or Owens for that matter) I'd take Antonio Brown over him too, and Brown is only going to make the gap bigger.Not buying this. Rice and Owens ahead of him, sure. But, not Fitz, Carter, Harrison, et al., above Moss.
On the bright side, there were 15 kids born yesterday that already know how to use the Internet. ?Poll is far too close.
Pretty sure I can answer. No. No they certainly wouldn't have.Zero chance anyone can answer that with any certainty. Arguing hypotheticals is impossible.
Well said.I do not agree that Moss's 2007 season is "almost as impressive" as Rice's entire career and all of the records he set, which is what you say here.
First of all, as others have mentioned, if we focus on regular season only, Rice's 1987 season of 1129 YFS and 23 TDs in 12 games (due to a strike) is more impressive than Moss's 2007 season of 98/1493/23 in 16 games. Rice had 23 of his team's 55 offensive TDs in 1987, compared to Moss's 23 of 67 offensive TDs.
More importantly, we should include the postseason in this discussion. Including the postseason, Moss had 105/1587/24 receiving plus 1/14/0 rushing in 19 games in 2007 with GOAT Brady at QB and GOAT Belichick at HC. He had 5/62/1 receiving in the Super Bowl, and his team lost.
IMO Rice had two seasons that were more impressive, all things considered:
Montana and Young are clearly among the best QBs of all time, but Brady > Montana > Young. And there is no comparison of head coaches... Belichick >>>>>>>>>> Seifert.
- In 1989, Rice had 101/1800/22 receiving and 5/33/0 rushing in 19 games with Montana/Young at QB and Siefert at HC. He had 7/148/3 in the Super Bowl, and his team won.
- In 1994, Rice had 128/1732/17 receiving and 8/103/2 rushing in 19 games with Young at QB and Siefert at HC. He had 10/149/3 in the Super Bowl, and his team won.
So peak season discussion goes to Rice, as does most every other form of comparison.
I don't believe this is true, but I am interested in hearing how you define their primes. What years would you characterize as primes for each of them?
Thanks Ron Wolf.Pretty sure I can answer. No. No they certainly wouldn't have.
Little known Laquon Treadwell effectThe Packers always draft consecutive DBs. 1st and 2nd round pick 2018, first and 2nd round pick in 2017
Final tally should be something likePoll is far too close.
Not even closeJerry Rice is the best wr I've ever seen play the game
Work ethic is very romantic. Work ethic doesn't mean much versus the physical abilities of Calvin and Moss.You are making an implicit assumption that Rice would be the exact same if he was starting today as when he was starting in 1985. I think that is a faulty premise. His work ethic is renowned, and training methods are better today. College passing offenses are also better today. He would be a better player entering the NFL now than he was then, when he was the 16th pick in the first round.
I get we are caught up in nostalgia, and his stats are undeniable. He is the greatest WR ever. But no, an NFL team is not drafting Jerry Rice if Calvin and Moss are there today. Maybe add the likes of Julio.No way in hell I’m taking anyone over Rice. All great receivers you named and none of them should be picked ahead of Rice today.
Work ethic is very romantic. Work ethic doesn't mean much versus the physical abilities of Calvin and Moss.
He can't run up a hill or eat better and grow 3 inches, gain 35 pounds, run a 4.3 40, and have a 40" vertical.
No way no how you would draft Rice today over those two today.. maybe add a couple more.
I get we are caught up in nostalgia, and his stats are undeniable. He is the greatest WR ever. But no, an NFL team is not drafting Jerry Rice if Calvin and Moss are there today. Maybe add the likes of Julio.
Based on ability, or picking the "best" player/athlete. Obviously Moss had other questions that made him drop, but I'm talking about the player.
Pretty simple, nothing Rice could do that they couldn't.
If they can do everything Rice can do then why didn't they? Why does Rice hold all the records?Pretty simple, nothing Rice could do that they couldn't.
Can't say the reverse.
Can't tell if serious.If they can do everything Rice can do then why didn't they? Why does Rice hold all the records?
Yeah, I suppose on the superficial measurable you’re probably right.Pretty simple, nothing Rice could do that they couldn't.
Can't say the reverse.
Otherwise, Rice had all of the advantages. Dynasty teams. 2 Hall of Fame QBs. Off the top of my head his mid 90s teams may have had more Hall of Famers than the entire history of the Detroit franchise. Played well, well past his decline (similar to the all time rushing leader).cobalt_27 said:Yeah, I suppose on the superficial measurable you’re probably right.
Still focused on superficial analysis, I see.Otherwise, Rice had all of the advantages. Dynasty teams. 2 Hall of Fame QBs. Off the top of my head his mid 90s teams may have had more Hall of Famers than the entire history of the Detroit franchise. Played well, well past his decline (similar to the all time rushing leader).
Calvin got drafted by the Lions. If we are holding these things against a WR...
I'm still on the fairly obvious observation that teams would draft Calvin over Rice today.Still focused on superficial analysis, I see.
Only the bad ones.I'm still on the fairly obvious observation that teams would draft Calvin over Rice today.
It's OK good buddy. If my opinion upsets you to the point you don't want to discuss it, you don't have to.Only the bad ones.
You’re terrible at this. Good buddy.It's OK good buddy. If my opinion upsets you to the point you don't want to discuss it, you don't have to.
Serious. Your boy Calvin couldn't do half of what Rice could do. That's why he didn't. If he could, he would have. He was a WR. His goal was to do what Rice could do.matuski said:Can't tell if serious.