The Man with the Plan said:
I don't need 1 season of stats to prove that MJD is a better player. He did all of his damage in only 14 games. Believe what you want but it certainly doesn't make him a worse player than Reggie Bush.
Maurice Jones-Drew had 873 return yards in 2006 to Reggie Bush's 216. They both scored 1 return TD each last season. So in addition to being a better runner and receiver than Reggie Bush he's also a better returner.
Reggie Bush had more receiving yards than MJD this is true (742 to 436). Of course he had nearly twice as many chances to catch the football(88 to 46). Efficiency though is the name of the game and as I showed in my earlier post MJD has a higher receiving average than Reggie Bush so he's a better receiver than he is.
It's utterly mind boggling to me how a player (MJD) can be better than a similar player (Bush) in every way imaginable yet be considered inferior. That doesn't make sense to me. Maybe I need to watch some more ESPN or play some more Madden or something.
Oh come on - you're being ingenuous at best...As everyone knows, punt return yards are much more difficult to gain the kick return yards -
Bush had 28 PRs 216Yds 1TD
MJD had 1PR 13Yds 0TD
If MJD is such a better punt returner, why didn't they use him more there????????
As for kick returns -
Bush had zero
MJD had 31 KRs 860Yds 1TD
Kick returners are much easier to find than punt returners, as shown by the leading KR average (26.8) being over TWICE the leading PR average (12.8).
So you discount Bush's receiving yards because he had more receptions, but don't disregard MJDs Return yards despite them being gained in an easier aspect of the game on top of him having more attempts?
I don't understand the need of MJD owners to keep trying to tout him as so much better than other players. I just don't get it.
As for receiving:
52% of MJDs receptions occurred behind the line, compared to 50% of Bush's receptions from behind the line. However, Bush's 2 TDs came from passes behind the line, as well as his longest reception.
Both of them for passes thrown between 1 and 10 yards in the air, have similar YPRs. No way of knowing then if they caught the ball and were tackled immediately, or if it was a 1 yard shovel pass that they individually turned into 8 yard gains.
Bush had two passes between 11 and 20 yards, and his YPR on those is over 20 yards, a good indication he caught the ball in stride and made additional YAC. MJD had only one pass between 11-20 yards, though he turned it into a 51 yard TD. Again, no way of knowing the situation on the play, etc.
I think quite honestly, it would be very difficult to say MJD was a better receiver based on his YPR. Especially since it's not significantly better than Bush's in any area.
On the other hand, since MJD was on the field most passing downs as the 3rd down RB and didn't see as many receptions as Bush might indicate Bush is the better receiver, especially considering the dearth of receiving options JAX has, and the welath of options NO has. Also, why didn't MJD see more passes down the field, like Bush did?
Maybe drops would be a measurement to see who is the better receiver? Bush had 8 out of his 88, MJD 4 out of 46... wow, about the same.
So, can someone definitively say one or the other is better? No. The only implication is the fact that Bush was used by the team much more as a receiver. That implies he's a better WR, but it's not enough. As for stats, they are remarkably similar, both these RBs are good receiving out of the backfield. MJD is not as good of a route runner, I don't think anyone would even try to argue that.
So the next question is, why does it matter?
Bush isn't getting drafted because people think he's so much better, but because he's in a better situation.