Yes, me as well. They are just consistently bad, and I don't see this draft fixing much. Carolina is the Runner-up for me, but it is fairly uncommon for a team to finish last 2 years in a row, so I held that against them.Voted Buffalo.
This is a good breakdown but I still think you need to put Buffalo in that last group. Carolina had a year where everything went wrong, but they actually do have a decent OL when healthy, they have solid RB's, and a good defense. Cleveland has a solid OL and a good/great running game. Tennessee has decent pieces on offense and defense. Buffalo has nothing going for them on offense or defense beyond a plucky backup QB and a #2 WR. The cupboard is bare.I think it will be a team with no QB that plays in a tough division. The obvious candidates include:BuffaloMiamiClevelandCincinnatiOaklandDenverTennesseeWashingtonMinnesotaCarolinaIf Buffalo keeps Fitzpatrick and Miami keeps Henne, I figure those guys will play well enough to win a few games. Ditto Denver if Orton stays. The Raiders should be pretty bad, but KC and Denver are soft spots in the division and Campbell is competent enough to win a few games. Washington seems like the kind of team that will always win about 5-8 games, so they're probably a longshot. The main reason they're on my list is because their division should be brutal. Trimming some of the longshots off the list leaves the following teams:ClevelandMinnesotaCarolinaTennesseeThis is my top four. Cleveland could be decent depending on McCoy. The other three teams are in big trouble. They have no quarterback. The Vikings still have some talent on defense and offense, but the Panthers and Titans are pretty depleted. I think it will be especially tough for them because the other tree teams in their division are all potential playoff contenders.
Packer Backer say what?The Bears.
I knew that would'd be the first to bite on that.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
The only reason I did was to jump at the opportunity to remind everyone about the Bears dominance in the division recently. I've been waiting to point that out all week.I knew that would'd be the first to bite on that.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
![]()
All I know is that the Packers are in the Super Bowl and the Bears aren't.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
A lot of good that did getting the Bears to the Super Bowl this year.The only reason I did was to jump at the opportunity to remind everyone about the Bears dominance in the division recently. I've been waiting to point that out all week.I knew that would'd be the first to bite on that.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
![]()
![]()
A lot of good that did getting the Bears to the Super Bowl this year.The only reason I did was to jump at the opportunity to remind everyone about the Bears dominance in the division recently. I've been waiting to point that out all week.I knew that would'd be the first to bite on that.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
![]()
![]()
![]()
A list of 12 teams and I don't see the Detroit Lions on it. That in itself is progress.Restore the Roar
Can't see that happening. They at least have a running game and a solid pass defense which should be good for 5-6 wins, especially if their QB (whoever it is) next year improves from last year. I'd say the 49ers have a better chance of sucking it up hard this year.My crystal ball is telling me that Carolina will be picking #1 overall for a second straight year.
I disagree. I really think Buffalo/Gailey goes after Cam Newton this year.They want to fill seats.Yes, me as well. They are just consistently bad, and I don't see this draft fixing much. Carolina is the Runner-up for me, but it is fairly uncommon for a team to finish last 2 years in a row, so I held that against them.Voted Buffalo.
Fun fact: the last team the Lions beat in the playoffs was the Aikman-Smith-Irvin Cowboys in 1991.A list of 12 teams and I don't see the Detroit Lions on it. That in itself is progress.Restore the Roar
DamnOnly a Bears fan would brag about winning the division over a team that just beat them in Chicago to advance to the Super Bowl.
It's easy to see them completely imploding.My early vote is Miami.
no good reason for this stuffA lot of good that did getting the Bears to the Super Bowl this year.The only reason I did was to jump at the opportunity to remind everyone about the Bears dominance in the division recently. I've been waiting to point that out all week.I knew that would'd be the first to bite on that.Packer Backer say what?The Bears.Don't worry, maybe we'll let you win the division next year. You do of course realize that the Bears have won the division 3 out of the last 6 years right? FYI, that's about 3 more times than the Packers did in that same span. Or in that 6 year span the worst they've ever finished is 7-9? (The Packers worst record is 6-10 in that same 6 year span).
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lighten up, Francis.no good reason for this stuff
The Titans schedule actually looks pretty tough.Titans have, at home: Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, Jacksonville Jaguars, Cincinnati Bengals, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Baltimore Ravens, New Orleans Saints and Denver Broncos.Away games against the Texans, Colts, Jaguars, Pittsburgh Steelers, Carolina Panthers, Cleveland Browns, Atlanta Falcons and Buffalo BillsNot the toughest I guess, but only 6 games against weaker teams. They could easily be 3-13 next year.I voted Panthers but the Titans have a good chance unless their HC gets the team together quick (lockout?) and IMO VY gives the team the best chance to be decent. But, they could also draft Gabbert this year which could screw things up even if they did get the #1 pick.CJ and their O-line gotta at least get the titans a few wins to not pick first
I felt like Finnegan stunk many times this year. A top CB splits the field for passing plays and changes so much. I don't even think it's debatable that he wasn't a top CB this past season. I still have major issues with the CB opposite him and it infuriates me that the Titans have made filling one spot seem so difficult. Spend some money, sign a name and move on. Draft a top CB and move on. I mean it's just so ridiculous to have such quality throughout a secondary and one (almost) vacant spot makes it seem like they stink. I watch on TV and almost feel embarrassed for their D when a QB throws at will to one spot. I can only imagine what it's like as a player. Clearly the Titans got the wrong McCourty. The ballhawk they drafted last year could be a fun nickel back. Get that spot filled already!And LB...I don't like em'. This used to be a prideful position for the Titans and some Sundays I wish they'd cut everyone and start anew. I mean you see the DL stand everyone up and then there's like this pause and Hope or Griffin makes a play. Where were the LBs? Why are the S making so many plays in the run game? They have a good DL and have last year's first rounder to add to the mix this year after injury. A quality OL, a RB that can play at a "best ever" caliber at times, a young WR with ginormous potential, who knows what Moss will do now, quality TEs. Some has beens and decent rooks at WR but they should be able to fill that in OK as long as Britt's and the TEs get much of the work. I think the Titans have a good team. I think the love for Fisher has many thinking they're hiring Ray Handley or Rick Kotite to replace him and that's just gotta wear off before people accept his replacement.The holes I mentioned can be dealt with with a reasonable offseason.As I understand it-Vince will be gone. Kerry and Simms are done at the turn of the new CBA year. If true, then Rusty Smith is their only QB. I can't stand his play. It's so pathetic. I think Fisher should have been fired for Rusty Smith. I think the whole scouting department and maybe even the GM should have. The QB coach should be suspended from working in the NFL for a few years. Craig Johnson probably ran to the Vikings so he wouldn't have to be switched back to QB coach and coach Rusty. The guy is just so bad. Maybe it's because I believed any positive spin they said and then saw him on TV that it makes me bitter but geesh is he bad.If they have no QB or a bad QB then I'd be willing to chalk them up to 0-16, nevermind 3-13. QB is just too important to a team's success that that is probably going to tell us all we need to know. If they get a decent QB then...nah I don't think they'll be the worst. Their lines, Finnegan and CJ should be good enough to stop that from happening.The Titans schedule actually looks pretty tough.Titans have, at home: Houston Texans, Indianapolis Colts, Jacksonville Jaguars, Cincinnati Bengals, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Baltimore Ravens, New Orleans Saints and Denver Broncos.Away games against the Texans, Colts, Jaguars, Pittsburgh Steelers, Carolina Panthers, Cleveland Browns, Atlanta Falcons and Buffalo BillsNot the toughest I guess, but only 6 games against weaker teams. They could easily be 3-13 next year.I voted Panthers but the Titans have a good chance unless their HC gets the team together quick (lockout?) and IMO VY gives the team the best chance to be decent. But, they could also draft Gabbert this year which could screw things up even if they did get the #1 pick.CJ and their O-line gotta at least get the titans a few wins to not pick first
yeah i placed that disclaimer in the OP with the "Locker-like post #1-hype" statementwe are treating this poll as if he DOES remain the consensus #1And why is Luck automattically the first pick?
How many player that were locks for #1 overall same back and wern't close the next season? a lot. Bradford was the exception even though he was injured he went #1 in a very weak draft and a desperate team for a QB picking first. Had the Rams even had a decent QB no chance Bradford goes first. Luck is a great QB but he gets inured or his stats go the other way especially without his coach he isn't the lock anymore.
I agree.BusterTBronco said:Please let it be Buffalo. Luck deserves nothing better.
How many player that were locks for #1 overall same back and wern't close the next season? a lot. Bradford was the exception even though he was injured he went #1 in a very weak draft and a desperate team for a QB picking first.