What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who has the worst draft? (1 Viewer)

AnonymousBob

Footballguy
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head.

Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.

With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many?

:lmao: :goodposting: :goodposting:

 
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head. Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many? :bag: :lmao: :lmao:
Well, they didnt draft Knoshon 12th overall to sit behind JJ arrington and Buckhalter. As bad as denver is on defense they didnt really have a RB imo. Right now he is looking like the 1.1 rookie picks in most drafts right now.
 
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head. Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
If I am a DEN fan, I would have been calling for McDaniels' head a while ago. He is an embarassment. However, I think OAK is off to the worst start.
 
Thus far IMO it is the JETS. Sanchez could very well work out, but the small body of work there was to go off of makes it very difficult to know if he is a franchise QB or not and that is what the JETS paid for him. A franchise QB price. The JETS gave up far more to draft Sanchez, he is even less proven than DHB and they picked him sooner than Oak took DHB.

 
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head. Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
If I am a DEN fan, I would have been calling for McDaniels' head a while ago. He is an embarassment. However, I think OAK is off to the worst start.
I haven't understood a single thing the Broncos have done this offseason. So I'm not surprised they made a shockingly suspect pick in the first round today. I realize they don't have a good RB but they have about 30 of them on the roster so they could go RBBC for a season if they have to. Given their glaring defensive issues that was the side of the ball I think they needed to address if they weren't able to trade up to get Sanchez.
 
You mean Oakland couldn't have traded back and gotten DHB? Come on. The guy didn't ctatch a ball in two games this year and supoosedly isn't the greatest hands guy. Huge bust of a pick here.

 
Raiders by far.

Possibly the Lions or Jets if Stafford/Sanchez end up busting.

Moreno is a solid player and he fills a need. I don't hate that pick.

 
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.

Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.

I've got no problem with the Denver pick.

 
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head. Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many? :goodposting: :goodposting: :lmao:
If I am a DEN fan, I would have been calling for McDaniels' head a while ago. He is an embarassment. However, I think OAK is off to the worst start.
I haven't understood a single thing the Broncos have done this offseason. So I'm not surprised they made a shockingly suspect pick in the first round today. I realize they don't have a good RB but they have about 30 of them on the roster so they could go RBBC for a season if they have to. Given their glaring defensive issues that was the side of the ball I think they needed to address if they weren't able to trade up to get Sanchez.
I agree. I think OAK and DEN are close in this regard. I think OAK is slightly worse because even though they took the right position, they took the wrong player (by far) IMO. At least Moreno is the #1 RB in this class IMO.
 
Yes, it's still early to call who has the worst draft, but thus far my vote goes to the Broncos. Just a terrible pick. If I'm a Denver fan I'm calling for McDaniel's head. Al Davis reached but he at least filled a need.With all the holes Denver had, they draft a rb? When they already had so many? :popcorn: :lmao: :lmao:
If I am a DEN fan, I would have been calling for McDaniels' head a while ago. He is an embarassment. However, I think OAK is off to the worst start.
I haven't understood a single thing the Broncos have done this offseason. So I'm not surprised they made a shockingly suspect pick in the first round today. I realize they don't have a good RB but they have about 30 of them on the roster so they could go RBBC for a season if they have to. Given their glaring defensive issues that was the side of the ball I think they needed to address if they weren't able to trade up to get Sanchez.
I agree. I think OAK and DEN are close in this regard. I think OAK is slightly worse because even though they took the right position, they took the wrong player (by far) IMO. At least Moreno is the #1 RB in this class IMO.
I agree. I think the Raiders made a worse pick. But I pretty much expect the Raiders to screw things up at this point. I can't figure out anything the Broncos have done so far this offseason. Moreno just adds to the confusion.
 
Josh McDaniels thinks he is playing fantasy football. He is stock piling runningbacks. Draft RB's early and often. Here comes pick 18 Beanie Wells anyone.

 
Moreno might have been a BPA pick. If they had him that high on the board I'm not surprised they took him. Little shocked they went RB over defense first but a lot of people had one of the RB's going to DEN in mocks.

As I type this they pick Ayers. There's your defense.

BTW, the RB's on Denver's roster were crap.

 
Josh McDaniels thinks he is playing fantasy football. He is stock piling runningbacks. Draft RB's early and often. Here comes pick 18 Beanie Wells anyone.
He's playing old-school fantasy and going RB-RB-RB to start off his draft. All the savvy owners will scoop up the WRs and kick his ###. :goodposting:
 
Josh McDaniels thinks he is playing fantasy football. He is stock piling runningbacks. Draft RB's early and often. Here comes pick 18 Beanie Wells anyone.
He's playing old-school fantasy and going RB-RB-RB to start off his draft. All the savvy owners will scoop up the WRs and kick his ###. :D
:lmao: At least Denver got Ayers, that's who I wanted them to take at 12. I wanted 2 defensive players, but I don't think you can say they have the worst draft anymore with Moreno and Ayers.
 
I like the Ayers pick but given how awful their defense has been, I think they may have been better served loading up on defensive players in the first round instead of taking another RB.

 
Kansas City Chiefs

Jackson only had 4.5 sacks last year at the college level, they could have just signed Olshansky.

 
I like the Ayers pick but given how awful their defense has been, I think they may have been better served loading up on defensive players in the first round instead of taking another RB.
Denver hasn't had a good stud RB in the past like 5 years.Once KC and GB took the top defensive guys they wanted...they probably went with best player available.
 
Obviously, it's OAK.

The Moreno pick was surprising, but a not a bad pick. If they felt Ayers was as good or better than Orakpo and weren't high on guys like Cushing, English, or Jenkins, I don't have a problem with Moreno.

I don't know enough about the players the Jets gave up, but it doesn't seem like they really overpaid to move up 13 spots to grab a nice QB.

 
Minnesota: Harvin :goodposting: 1st round return man
Yep, just like Eddie Royal was a 2nd round return man for the Broncos last season.A lot of the Harvin haters will be eating crow.
LOL. Comparing Harvin to a hard working, catch everything stud like Eddie Royal. LMAO!!!!Minnesota throws their name in the hat for horrible draft.
Check back in a few years. Harvin is a player. He'll be a fine addition for the Vikes.
 
Minnesota: Harvin :goodposting: 1st round return man
Yep, just like Eddie Royal was a 2nd round return man for the Broncos last season.A lot of the Harvin haters will be eating crow.
LOL. Comparing Harvin to a hard working, catch everything stud like Eddie Royal. LMAO!!!!Minnesota throws their name in the hat for horrible draft.
Check back in a few years. Harvin is a player. He'll be a fine addition for the Vikes.
Harvin is going to celebrate tonight by firing up a big fatty :shrug:
 
Too soon to tell. Even Oakland's draft could look good a few years from now. Hey-Bey will get a chance to be a #1 receiver.

 
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10. Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
 
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10. Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
I think it may be a change in philosophy. Run the ball more shorten the game and keep your defense off the field. And Moreno will be better then Faulk. There are plenty of RBs who aren't 5'10". Westbrook comes to mind.
 
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10. Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
Yeah, you guys are absolutely screwed. Sorry, Denver fans. My only advice to start spreading rumors about McDaniels being a double agent for Belicheck, and maybe he'll get fired quickly.
 
Raiders will lock this up at pick #40.

But whoever the winner is, will come from the AFC West.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10. Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
Yeah, you guys are absolutely screwed. Sorry, Denver fans. My only advice to start spreading rumors about McDaniels being a double agent for Belicheck, and maybe he'll get fired quickly.
Not to steal Bill Simmons schtick, but as the season goes on, I half expect him to hold a press conference and then pull off his shirt revealing a NE hoodie and revealing he was all part of a plan that NE brass sent him to Denver to destroy the team for the next 5 years. :thumbup:
 
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.

Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.

I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10.

Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
Are you serious? This is absolutely absurd.I was surprised by the pick like everyone else, but to make this claim about Moreno is way off base.

I'll be shocked if he isn't their workhorse from day 1.

 
So far it is the Jets and it isn't even close. Paid way too much for Sanchez and I'm not sure he will be the best QB on their roster.

 
Denver is running away with this thing. They traded up to take Smith? Their 2010 first round pick? Hahahaha

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Lions have had the worst draft so far, 41 million guaranteed is a joke even for the #1 pick.

 
The Lions have had the worst draft so far, 41 million guaranteed is a joke even for the #1 pick.
:mellow: We're not grading the money they spend. It's the picks themselves. They took the top qb, te, and safety. They could have had better but imo this team doesn't come anywhere close to the worst.
 
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.

Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.

I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10.

Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
Are you serious? This is absolutely absurd.I was surprised by the pick like everyone else, but to make this claim about Moreno is way off base.

I'll be shocked if he isn't their workhorse from day 1.
You have been in every one of the Bronco threads like me and have said the same thing, scoring wasn't our issue last year. We need defensive help in the middle and pass rushing. I am down on Moreno because of A)the # of backs Denver has on the roster from last year B) the # of backs Denver has picked up in FA C) McDork's love for all that is NE and the run scheme the he had in place there. It is a wasted pick in compared to what this team needs. I probably shouldn't be so hard on him as a player.

If you have the #1 punter in the league on your team, you don't draft another punter just because he happens to be the best player available.

And now we just traded away any advantage we gained by getting rid of Cutler, our first round pick next year for a 2nd rounder this year.

Even Gruden is wondering what the heck Denver is doing with this team.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am down on Moreno because of A)the # of backs Denver has on the roster from last year
Who does Denver have at RB? No one who looks like a #1 RB. If Moreno can be your franchise back for the next 4-6 years, that's a solid pick at #12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Courtjester said:
Ron_Mexico said:
Oakland could have traded down 20n spots and still landed DHB.

Denver has a bunch of RBs, but none who can really carry the load.

I've got no problem with the Denver pick.
But with Cutler, Denver put up 25+ a game and our defense let us down almost every week and they lost.So now we don't have Cutler and have done nothing to address the defense, and instead grab a guy who is probably going to be, at best, a 3rd down back-Kevin Faulk guy at 5'10.

Oakland's pick was terrible, but if you take into consideration the big picture, DHB could develop, what McDork did to this team is unforgivable.
Are you serious? This is absolutely absurd.I was surprised by the pick like everyone else, but to make this claim about Moreno is way off base.

I'll be shocked if he isn't their workhorse from day 1.
You have been in every one of the Bronco threads like me and have said the same thing, scoring wasn't our issue last year. We need defensive help in the middle and pass rushing. I am down on Moreno because of A)the # of backs Denver has on the roster from last year B) the # of backs Denver has picked up in FA C) McDork's love for all that is NE and the run scheme the he had in place there. It is a wasted pick in compared to what this team needs. I probably shouldn't be so hard on him as a player.

If you have the #1 punter in the league on your team, you don't draft another punter just because he happens to be the best player available.

And now we just traded away any advantage we gained by getting rid of Cutler, our first round pick next year for a 2nd rounder this year.

Even Gruden is wondering what the heck Denver is doing with this team.....
while I agree in general that Moreno was not a good pick, let's remember - the Den O did not score 25/game...they were 16th in scoring. The O was not the unstoppable force many have claimed - they put up a ton of yards but struggled to close the deal. A strong running game should help that out, take pressure off of Orton and take pressure off of the D.I'm against the Moreno pick overall though - the D was sooooo bad that McD had no business drafting anyone but DL and LB. I'm not happy at all right now as a Bronco fan.

 
I am down on Moreno because of A)the # of backs Denver has on the roster from last year
Who does Denver have at RB? No one who looks like a #1 RB. If Moreno can be your franchise back for the next 4-6 years, that's a solid pick at #12.
Denver finished 12th in rushing last year even with 7 different RB's. The injuries, not the talent, was the problem.Again, I don't necessarily think Moreno is terrible--I think it can be argued he is value at that pick. But, please reread my statement, scoring was not Denver's problem. Moreno can put up 200 yards and 2 td's, but that don't make a hill of beans when our D gives up 35 points a game.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top