need2know
Footballguy
Was he hurt coming into the game?he's hurt. out the rest of the game. tried to warn you all
Was he hurt coming into the game?he's hurt. out the rest of the game. tried to warn you all
Did people really start him? Such a big risk of a doughnut. He was sitting squarely on my one bench where I had him.Well that sucked
No. Just picked him up. I know one guy in a league started him. DumbDid people really start him? Such a big risk of a doughnut. He was sitting squarely on my one bench where I had him.
not that I'm aware. injuries are impossible to predict but inside info from a buddy was that he's soft and wasn't cut for even 10 handoffsWas he hurt coming into the game?
Me too. It didn't cost anything and it was on my deep roster team. Anyone who started him is already in such bad shape or was way too hopeful for a guy activated from the practice squad. I know for a fact as a Panthers fan that that doesn't tend to be a good thing.No. Just picked him up. I know one guy in a league started him. Dumb
Wish I read that beforenot that I'm aware. injuries are impossible to predict but inside info from a buddy was that he's soft and wasn't cut for even 10 handoffs
Ur buddy had inside info on some gb practice squad player??not that I'm aware. injuries are impossible to predict but inside info from a buddy was that he's soft and wasn't cut for even 10 handoffs
his inside info on lacy being done for the year was spot on 24 hours before anyone on here reported it. I even made a post about it. his work gives him connections to the team and players; he works for the hospital group that is contracted with themUr buddy had inside info on some gb practice squad player??
And what exactly is the medical term for "soft and can't handle 10 handoffs"his inside info on lacy being done for the year was spot on 24 hours before anyone on here reported it. I even made a post about it. his work gives him connections to the team and players; he works for the hospital group that is contracted with them
as I said, him working close with the team gives him access to information. and information I was getting was practice looked like montgomery would get the majority of the carries and Jackson looked softAnd what exactly is the medical term for "soft and can't handle 10 handoffs"
Did you say this before the game?not that I'm aware. injuries are impossible to predict but inside info from a buddy was that he's soft and wasn't cut for even 10 handoffs
no I did not know this until close to kick off. In fact before I kept montgomery in I gave him a text to ask him what the deal with Jackson was. he told me don't worry about it stick with tyDid you say this before the game?
Next time share the wealth, yo! Lolno I did not know this until close to kick off. In fact before I kept montgomery in I gave him a text to ask him what the deal with Jackson was. he told me don't worry about it stick with ty
he's hurt. out the rest of the game. tried to warn you all
Did you say this before the game?
no I did not know this until close to kick off. In fact before I kept montgomery in I gave him a text to ask him what the deal with Jackson was. he told me don't worry about it stick with ty
     
 tried to warn you about him in general. he was a practice squad guy not activated when all we had was lacy. that tells you enough right there.
no I did not know this until close to kick off. In fact before I kept montgomery in I gave him a text to ask him what the deal with Jackson was. he told me don't worry about it stick with ty
you are correct. that is why I answered "no" when asked if I posted it before the game. it's the first word in my reply to his question
and information I was getting was practice looked like montgomery would get the majority of the carries and Jackson looked soft
i didn't see this posted before the game.....
We can always remember Don fondly as the Jackson Six.Eerie has similar this played out tonight with Jackson and the situation with Dwayne Washington in week 4. In both cases, some of us spent too much time in here speculating about startability and expectations, then both of them got 2 carries for 6 yards and left with injuries!!!
I understand...I get tired of people claiming after the fact that they had some "inside information". I could just as easily offer up say, as of now Prescott is starting for Dallas on week 8, then the game starts and it's actually Romo. I could post that a friend of mine who works with the Cowboys told me on Saturday that Romo looked real good in practice on Thursday/Friday. He told me they were going to start him.you are correct. that is why I answered "no" when asked if I posted it before the game. it's the first word in my reply to his question
if you're addressing the information I referenced, no you wouldn't have seen that either unless you had my phone in your hand or you knew my friend and it was a group text
True. I don't like that either. I cannot give his name. He has given me some rumor/inside info mostly on injury severities as well as rumors he hears on practices. I literally got the information minutes before kick off and had enough time to make sure he was in my lineup. Didn't post it here because by the time I did it wouldn't have mattered probably for most people. I have posted my insider information in the past ahead of time. In one of these threads I posted that Lacy's injury was a potential season ender, roughly a day maybe more than when it was announced.jerry jones said:I understand...I get tired of people claiming after the fact that they had some "inside information". I could just as easily offer up say, as of now Prescott is starting for Dallas on week 8, then the game starts and it's actually Romo. I could post that a friend of mine who works with the Cowboys told me on Saturday that Romo looked real good in practice on Thursday/Friday. He told me they were going to start him.
it has no credibility....now, if you posted that info before the game...well, there's your credibility
Ha! You're not the famous The Jackson 4 on FFC during off-season mocks, by any chance?We can always remember Don fondly as the Jackson Six.
 Absolutely not. He might become something eventually this season but he's a long shot. Picked him up to see if I could strike instant gold with the Thursday night game. But even before his injury it was the ty Montgomery show back there.Anyone holding in redraft ?
I think so. Stranger things have happened, but I don't see him carving out the backfield to himself with Davis on board, Starks coming back (even if he's been lousy) and Montgomery carving out a role.Drop in dynasty as well as redraft? I just don't see much opportunity here.
Depends on options but I think I'll drop him and keep smelter.Drop in dynasty as well as redraft? I just don't see much opportunity here.
Not surprising to me at all.D.Jackson getting the start this Sunday? ..per Rappaport?
Are you sure? I just searched and couldn't find anything about this except last Thursday's report of him starting. I just dropped patterson for him based on this.D.Jackson getting the start this Sunday? ..per Rappaport?
Riveting! Not the long, boring story about something that happened to your fantasy team a year ago.I needed 2.7 points from Don "he's starting!" Jackson to save my season in one of my leagues.
While I realize how pathetic that last sentence sounds, bear in mind I had a ton of injuries and due to BYE issues, big Don Jackson was, I thought, a lock for 5 points.
I've got Big Ben/Matty Ice, Julio, Dez, Maclan & Ingram. It's a team that now finally healthy; should easily be one of the weekly point leaders, even having lost Roethlisburger. At 2-5 I'm sunk. At 3-4 I've got a shot at the wild card, and my opponent was one of the WC contenders.
Needless to say, the esteemed Mr Jackson's less than stellar performance did not net me the 2.7 points I required to continue to compete in that league. :(
   Tell us who was on your bench that cold, dark day in late October.I was considering starting a blog or a newsletter. You're welcome to subscribe. I'll keep you posted.proninja said:Be sure to keep us updated. Maybe the mods can pin this thread now.
The bold is a pretty... er... bold statement for Knile Davis. I'd say there's still opportunity for someone to work in with Ty, but I don't see why it can't be Jackson. In games with double digit touches, Davis has more with under 3 YPC (3) than he does with more than 4 YPC (2).And don't forget that knile Davis will be up to speed soon. He's undoubtedly a better and more NFL ready back than Jackson. At bet he'll be in a 3 headed rbbc with Davis and Montgomery. No thanks.
Don Jackson - RB - Packers
Packers RB Don Jackson (hand) has been removed from the Week 8 injury report.
Jackson is healthy enough to be active, but his role could be limited. Ty Montgomery projects to lead Green Bay's backfield in touches.
Oct 28 - 7:39 PM
Hey I hope you're rt I picked up don jackson once again last night based on a rumor someone posted in this thread that Ian rappaport says he's starting this weekend.The bold is a pretty... er... bold statement for Knile Davis. I'd say there's still opportunity for someone to work in with Ty, but I don't see why it can't be Jackson. In games with double digit touches, Davis has more with under 3 YPC (3) than he does with more than 4 YPC (2).
We don't know what Jackson will be, but pretty sure Knile Davis isn't that good.
I hope I'm right too. My biggest bet was placed on Montgomery, but I own Jackson in every league too, and Davis in one (where I really don't want him). Time will tell -- I'm just surprised at all the enthusiasm for Davis.Hey I hope you're rt I picked up don jackson once again last night based on a rumor someone posted in this thread that Ian rappaport says he's starting this weekend.
I never doubted your team for a second. I knew you were dealing with a ton of injuries and it was only a matter of time before you were one of the weekly point leaders, even having lost Big Ben. Too bad DJ couldn't have saved your season. It really bothers me to no end. Not sure how I will be able to sleep at night knowing how great of a team you have and you aren't going to make the playoffs. It sucks man.I needed 2.7 points from Don "he's starting!" Jackson to save my season in one of my leagues.
While I realize how pathetic that last sentence sounds, bear in mind I had a ton of injuries and due to BYE issues, big Don Jackson was, I thought, a lock for 5 points.
I've got Big Ben/Matty Ice, Julio, Dez, Maclan & Ingram. It's a team that now finally healthy; should easily be one of the weekly point leaders, even having lost Roethlisburger. At 2-5 I'm sunk. At 3-4 I've got a shot at the wild card, and my opponent was one of the WC contenders.
Needless to say, the esteemed Mr Jackson's less than stellar performance did not net me the 2.7 points I required to continue to compete in that league. :(
I wish him well. he's got a good story. Montgomery is pretty much the man right now. Opponents might start to key in on that more now that they've seen it for a game or 2, but he should be a great source of points. I'm not sure what'll be there for Don.
 Thanks - it really means a lot to have the support of my fellow fantasy owners in this difficult time. I appreciate y'all having my back. I-i love you man.I never doubted your team for a second. I knew you were dealing with a ton of injuries and it was only a matter of time before you were one of the weekly point leaders, even having lost Big Ben. Too bad DJ couldn't have saved your season. It really bothers me to no end. Not sure how I will be able to sleep at night knowing how great of a team you have and you aren't going to make the playoffs. It sucks man.
![]()
I have memories of Davis filling in Wellington the past when Charles was hurt. I guess that's where my opinion comes from.I hope I'm right too. My biggest bet was placed on Montgomery, but I own Jackson in every league too, and Davis in one (where I really don't want him). Time will tell -- I'm just surprised at all the enthusiasm for Davis.
Davis looked great in stints there.I have memories of Davis filling in Wellington the past when Charles was hurt. I guess that's where my opinion comes from.
   Go ahead, and enjoy your coffee before posting the whole team.. Dont let envy get ya down!Davis looked great in stints there.
My concern is that was a much better system for a RB like Davis.
GB is a great system for passing 50+ times a game.
Eddie Lacy in his rookie season looked like he was finally going to provide a beast-mode RB that the Pack couldn't ignore. They were finally going to have a stud who could tote the rock 20+, setting up PA for Rodgers. Lacy could make his own yards and wasn't purely dependent on what the line gave him.
I'' not sure it's the best fit for a 2 yards and a cloud of dust guy like Davis, mostly because I don't think he's going to get the workload he'll need to be super productive fantasy-wise. Your best bet with davis is short yardage /cheap TDS, but again, packers love to throw on 1st and goal at the 1.
I realize I left out vital information about my fantasy team - sorry to let down those who were counting on an update.![]()
Hells no...So who has the fortitude to start Jackson this week? Over whom?
1-2-3-notit!So who has the fortitude to start Jackson this week? Over whom?
I was hoping for clarity on this too, as I saw Rappaport on NFL TA yesterday evening, stating that Jackson would start, but could find no further link or twitter confirmation.. I had already picked up K.Davis and wanted to know if I got the wrong guy.. I'm short an RB wk9 due to BYE-megeddon after drafting J.Charles and CJA. If anyone has more info, I'm all ears...Hey I hope you're rt I picked up don jackson once again last night based on a rumor someone posted in this thread that Ian rappaport says he's starting this weekend.