mad sweeney
Footballguy
So the radio guys can use the telustrator, spot shadow, and highlight features to show us replays how and why plays worked? They may be more descriptive and better speakers but as far as analyzing and relating the hows and whys to the audience the visual impact alone sets any TV analyst above radio guys.Not so. The radio guys (no matter what the sport) have always done the best job at calling the game and analyzing what's going on.I thought we were talking about current or at least recent analysts. And besides, with replays and visuals, Jaws can analyze and relate things better than any radio broadcaster ever couldAgree about Jaws, but disagree about anyone else not being a true analyst of the game. I thought Hank Stram did a very good job analyzing the game when he was teamed up with Jack Buck on the radio.And also agree about Buck/Aikman, though more because of Buck. Didn't that guy listen to his dad call a game?A thousand times JAWS!!!
Dude will tell you how the FB's first step caused the LB to do this which caused the safety to do that which frees up the skinny post. No one has ever come close to being a true analyst of the game. It's an amazing travesty that they put such a great FB mind in the booth with a complete talk show moron.
Long is good but he's not nearly as comprehensive as Jaws.
Mark Schlereth is my second favorite.
Buck and Aikman blow.