switz
Footballguy
You're missing the point.PMENFAN said:Yeah, because Harrison wasn't even close to 1k before Manning came along; only getting 836 and 8 TD's his rookie year, without Wayne on the other side, and without Manning. He's been all about Manning making him.
Stokely was injured.PMENFAN said:But, if he made Stokley so much better, what happened after 2004? Why one great year, and never abore 1 TD again? Wouldn't you say 2004 was more a fluke than anything? I'd say so.
So you are saying Manning was good at progressing through his options. Good.PMENFAN said:You also have to consider it's a lot easier throwing to the third receiver when you have to cover Harrison, Wayne and Clark.
Well, yeah. How is it he's SO GOOD, but can't get a single WR he's ever played with, to score double digit TDs? Manning got Brandon Stokely a 10 TD season, as his THIRD option... Brady can't do it with his first or second?PMENFAN said:Brady's never had a 10 TD receiver. Does that matter?
Manning has had his share of bad playoff games. Brady has had his share of great playoff games. But side by side, Manning is still the better QB. Have you ever considered that the pressure is so much more on Manning than Brady?PMENFAN said:IIRC, that year Manning had 3, and still managed only 3 points in his playoff loss. How does that happen? How can he be individually making his receivers so much better and manage to score only 3 points in a playoff game? That's right, it was one of the years when the defense let him down.
The point isn't that they've gotten better w/o Brady. It's that they haven't gotten worse.PMENFAN said:What receiver has gotten better by leaving New England? There have been a few that have left the 3 Superbowl championship teams. Patten, Givens, Branch, Bethel Johnson. I think every one of these guys was made better by playing with Brady.
Caldwell and Gaffney, I have maintained, are much better WRs than PAts fans want people to think. However, Branch was far better in the playoffs in NE than they were this year. In fact, Caldwell and Gaffney were both drafted higher than Branchm and _should_ outperfofm him (from that POV). I digress, because I think Branch should have been drafted higher, he was a steal where the Pats got him.PMENFAN said:Caldwell and Gaffney both played better in the playoffs than Branch. Now, compare their salaries.
As I said above, Brady has historically gotten it done in the playoffs. He's not a bad QB. But I give more credit to his coaches than I do to Brady for those wins. And Mannign deserves his share of blame for the playoff losses.However, the difference is that Mannign was expected to win the game by himself, whereas Brady wasn't expected to win the game by himself. IMO.PMENFAN said:I guess that's one reason I'd rather have Brady that I didn't cit above. Brady's defense let's him down less frequently. More so, I would take Brady, because in the Playoffs, Manning has a history of getting shut down, and Brady doesn't. Even with the #1 and #2 offense year in and out, Manning has been shut down in the playoffs. Even with a middle of the road offense, Brady doesn't. Yes, he only put up 14 in Denver last year, in his worse game. That's a far cry from a 0, or a 3. That's driving a Ford, not a Ferrari.