benching him for wardI am seriously considering benching him for either Lamont Jordan or Derrick Ward. Leaning towards Ward at this point...
LJ plays Chicago.I have L. Johnson in 2 leagues.
I'm benching him for C. Portis in one, and L. Jordan in the other.
There is no way that LJ exceeds 75 total yards and I don't believe KC scores at all. San Diego pitches a shutout in this one.
Intra-squad scrimmages don't mean as much as real games, though.KC has a festering O-line an aging Top 5 TE and they were horrible as a unit against the worst team in the NFL. There's no way that KC eclipses 200 net yards in Offense.
WOW, that is craziness....I am seriously considering benching him for either Lamont Jordan or Derrick Ward. Leaning towards Ward at this point...
I think it has more to do with the matchup than his performance last week. Of course I thought that was obvious.Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
Well, if you took him top 5 why would you be concerned with matchups? Obviously you thought he was a "stud". And since it's wise to not bech studs, why would you do so this week?JohnnyU said:I think it has more to do with the matchup than his performance last week. Of course I thought that was obvious.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
It depends on the matchup and who I had as a replacement. Like I said, the only RBs I see that you NEVER bench right now are LT2 and SJax. Yes, there are very few run defenses that I would bench LJ against, but CHI and maybe the Vikings are two of them.Well, if you took him top 5 why would you be concerned with matchups? Obviously you thought he was a "stud". And since it's wise to not bech studs, why would you do so this week?JohnnyU said:I think it has more to do with the matchup than his performance last week. Of course I thought that was obvious.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
Maroney? When did he become a stud? Looks like an overrated bum to me. Either way, how is the matchup against San Diego any better than what LJ faces? Sandiego may not have quite the d that chicago does but Maroney isn't half the running back the Larry Johnson is. Playing the matchup game with players like LJ is not wise. You do that with your 2nd and 3rd tier players.Thinking is good. Overthinking, not so good. Go with LJ. You'll never be able to predict when a guy like that goes off. You made your choice when you drafted him. Go with it or trade him.pablito said:In my keeper league I'm starting Maroney and Portis over LJ.
AGAIN, it has nothing to do with 1 bad game. It has everything to do with the matchup and who you have to replace him. In my mind there are only 2 RBs you play regardless of matchup and regardless who you have on the bench, and that is LT2 and SJax.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...One of the best backs in the NFL and he was probably drafted in the top 5. Who benches their top 5 pick because of 1 bad game?
Alright, but would you bench him for a slug like Maroney?It depends on the matchup and who I had as a replacement. Like I said, the only RBs I see that you NEVER bench right now are LT2 and SJax. Yes, there are very few run defenses that I would bench LJ against, but CHI and maybe the Vikings are two of them.Well, if you took him top 5 why would you be concerned with matchups? Obviously you thought he was a "stud". And since it's wise to not bech studs, why would you do so this week?JohnnyU said:I think it has more to do with the matchup than his performance last week. Of course I thought that was obvious.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
Not sure why Jackson is included in the same sentence as LT but....AGAIN, it has nothing to do with 1 bad game. It has everything to do with the matchup and who you have to replace him. In my mind there are only 2 RBs you play regardless of matchup and regardless who you have on the bench, and that is LT2 and SJax.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...One of the best backs in the NFL and he was probably drafted in the top 5. Who benches their top 5 pick because of 1 bad game?
No, but if Maroney had been tearing the league up for a few weeks and had a sweet matchup, and LJ was playing the Bears, then yes I would.Alright, but would you bench him for a slug like Maroney?It depends on the matchup and who I had as a replacement. Like I said, the only RBs I see that you NEVER bench right now are LT2 and SJax. Yes, there are very few run defenses that I would bench LJ against, but CHI and maybe the Vikings are two of them.Well, if you took him top 5 why would you be concerned with matchups? Obviously you thought he was a "stud". And since it's wise to not bech studs, why would you do so this week?JohnnyU said:I think it has more to do with the matchup than his performance last week. Of course I thought that was obvious.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...
....because IMO he is the 2nd best back in the league by a wide margin.Not sure why Jackson is included in the same sentence as LT but....AGAIN, it has nothing to do with 1 bad game. It has everything to do with the matchup and who you have to replace him. In my mind there are only 2 RBs you play regardless of matchup and regardless who you have on the bench, and that is LT2 and SJax.murzman said:Bencing LJ??! Do that many people actually put that much value in 1 game? No more than 1 week ago LJ was consensus top 5... and now people plan on sitting him? I don't care who he plays. If your team is that good that you can bench LJ, then maybe you should be looking to trade him away...One of the best backs in the NFL and he was probably drafted in the top 5. Who benches their top 5 pick because of 1 bad game?
being angry isn't going to make the Chiefs suck any less. LJ owners are in for a loooooooooooooong year.el-gato-grande said:LJ is pissed about his performance last week. An Angry Johnson = Fantasy Stud