I guess the question becomes, is selling one's future to win a Super Bowl really bad? Obviously, for a big money league, then I can see the argument. For smaller $ but competitive leagues where the winning owner isn't gonna bail after he wins one title, I don't see it as a problem. Completely selling out your team for that one shot to win (which isn't guaranteed anyway) is not an easy decision and I don't think is as automatic as you think. Studs can disappoint and then not only does he not win but now he has compromised his future. The other thing to consider is this. Although the timing of it is obviously dissimilar, how is that different from a team that drafts older studs in the startup draft in the hopes of taking the title the 1st year and paying for the rest of his years? Granted, things could go wrong throughout the year and nothing is guaranteed and much more risk involved, but the point of drafting that way is with the clear intention of winning the 1st year and selling out the future. Completely viable philosophy.