What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Why do people hate Peyton Manning? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's the closest thing to a gimme there is in the playoffs.
:lmao: at Pittsburgh being close to a gimme. I wonder if the Bengals knew that?... ;) J
You mean the Bengals who kept it close for much of that game with their backup QB after a freak injury? This is getting pathetic, guys. Seriously. I particularly expected more from you, Joe.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, none of this had anything to do with my original point. I just thought it was pretty silly to knock a Pittsburgh team that most people knew was far more dangerous than their seeding would suggest.
Who said I was knocking a Pittsburgh team at all? That's what I don't get about this message board. You act like being critical of a player means you're also being critical of the team that made that player look bad. It doesn't, and it shows just how clueless some of you are about the game.
You called them a "gimme". If that's knocking them, I don't know what is.
 
The following things are also Peyton Manning's fault:

War in Iraq

National debt

Beavers damming things

Kickers missing FGs no matter what the game

Fat chicks

The McRib sandwich

Lions GM situation

leaves in my yard

Global Warming

Nick Leshay
:goodposting:
 
Organized religion is a good thing? You lost me. I'm also impressed you know how to spell Lachey. Big fan are you?
Organized religion is certainly a popular thing at minimum.As to Lachey, that all has to do with a shock jock a long time ago. Still, shame on you for using it without getting it right.

 
It's the closest thing to a gimme there is in the playoffs.
:lmao: at Pittsburgh being close to a gimme. I wonder if the Bengals knew that?... ;) J
You mean the Bengals who kept it close for much of that game with their backup QB after a freak injury? This is getting pathetic, guys. Seriously. I particularly expected more from you, Joe.
Yes, the Bengals who played with Kitna as their QB. Obviously Manning didn't play well enough to win today. Some people will hate him no matter what. Some will love him no matter what. Most like me are in the middle.

But I have to be honest, Pittsburgh being close to a gimme is :lmao:

J

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The following things are also Peyton Manning's fault:

War in Iraq

National debt

Beavers damming things

Kickers missing FGs no matter what the game

Fat chicks

The McRib sandwich

Lions GM situation

leaves in my yard

Global Warming

Nick Leshay
:goodposting:
you just gave yourself a good posting???? Now I have seen it all.
 
Organized religion is a good thing?  You lost me.  I'm also impressed you know how to spell Lachey.  Big fan are you?
Organized religion is certainly a popular thing at minimum.As to Lachey, that all has to do with a shock jock a long time ago. Still, shame on you for using it without getting it right.
That made me laugh. Nice. You should have put the bag at the end and it would have perfect!
 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.J

 
The following things are also Peyton Manning's fault:

War in Iraq

National debt

Beavers damming things

Kickers missing FGs no matter what the game

Fat chicks

The McRib sandwich

Lions GM situation

leaves in my yard

Global Warming

Nick Leshay
:goodposting:
you just gave yourself a good posting???? Now I have seen it all.
This thread deserved it. Particularly your posts.
 
You called them a "gimme". If that's knocking them, I don't know what is.
They were a gimme. I'm calling them exactly what they were -- the 6th best team in the AFC. Logic dictates that the best team in the AFC WHO HAD BEATEN THEM ONCE ALREADY should have little trouble defeating them. In my mind, recognizing their true status actually is a compliment because it shows how they overcame.
 
Where did the poll part of this thread go........I have been away for 1-2 hrs.
I think the poll was contradictory to your claim that you wanted to have an open & honest conversation about Peyton Manning.Unless you really think people hate him because his Christian? Which if you do... you are insane, I mean crazier than FlaWed and Dr. Detroit put together.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, none of this had anything to do with my original point. I just thought it was pretty silly to knock a Pittsburgh team that most people knew was far more dangerous than their seeding would suggest.

My original point was that the Steelers dominated the Colts in the trenches on both sides of the ball. If the Steelers weren't very good, maybe that means the Colts' linemen choked. Regardless, Manning made great throws when he had time, which was not very often.
The Colts beat the Steelers 26-7 in Week 12 at home, there was a reason the Colts were big favorites. Its not a slight against Pittsburgh that they were an underdog, but its not a stretch to say this was a game Indy was expected to win. Why was Manning able to make the right adjustments in the regular season game and not today? Was it 100% the O-line? Personally, I don't think its that simple.
 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
 
The following things are also Peyton Manning's fault:

War in Iraq

National debt

Beavers damming things

Kickers missing FGs no matter what the game

Fat chicks

The McRib sandwich

Lions GM situation

leaves in my yard

Global Warming

Nick Leshay
:goodposting:
you just gave yourself a good posting???? Now I have seen it all.
No..Red(Horse)Apples has a thread he started about Gado in his sig. That is much more pathetic.
 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J

 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J
If this was so obvious, why was it that virtually every expert who picked this game picked the Colts? Why was the line -9 Colts? I respect this Steelers team and what they were able to accomplish. It does not mean that they should have won this game today. Anyone who believes otherwise is kidding himself.

 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J
If this was so obvious, why was it that virtually every expert who picked this game picked the Colts? Why was the line -9 Colts? I respect this Steelers team and what they were able to accomplish. It does not mean that they should have won this game today. Anyone who believes otherwise is kidding himself.
possibly a little starry eyed hype. A lot of the talking heads picked the Colts, a lot of other people picked the Steelers.
 
Actually, none of this had anything to do with my original point. I just thought it was pretty silly to knock a Pittsburgh team that most people knew was far more dangerous than their seeding would suggest.

My original point was that the Steelers dominated the Colts in the trenches on both sides of the ball. If the Steelers weren't very good, maybe that means the Colts' linemen choked. Regardless, Manning made great throws when he had time, which was not very often.
The Colts beat the Steelers 26-7 in Week 12 at home, there was a reason the Colts were big favorites. Its not a slight against Pittsburgh that they were an underdog, but its not a stretch to say this was a game Indy was expected to win. Why was Manning able to make the right adjustments in the regular season game and not today? Was it 100% the O-line? Personally, I don't think its that simple.
Of course it's not that simple. Football is a complicated game. There were many factors. Offensive line, defensive line, secondary, quarterback. No one deserves 100% of the blame.It seems like a lot of posters on this board treat the play of every position outside of the offensive skill positions as a constant. It's not as simple as saying the Colts won last time, the Steelers won this time, so Manning must have done something different. Players at every other position have good and bad games too. Coaches get outcoached sometimes.

Manning's getting the vast majority of the blame here. He made a few mistakes, sure, but all things considered I thought he played well and was highly accurate when given ample time to throw. There are many, many better places to point fingers on the Colts team. Coaching, OL, DL, secondary, kicker, and so on.

 
He also had happy feet for the first two or three series of the game today. Thats the best way to tell how nervous he is. He can't keep his feet still when he is worried about pressure.
This is an EXCELLENT point.As and Indy native and a growing Colts fan, (it's hard not to like the team when you live in town...) I looked at my wife half way thru the first quarter and said "He's got happy feet again - just like the San Diego Game... this isn't going to end well."

When Manning gets pressured and doesn't feel comfortable in the pocket he jumps around like rookie QB. What's even more frustrating is, why can't the coaches see this and work with him on it. Plus - the running game always seems to calm him down. When Edge gets on track and the chains are moving on the ground, Manning calms down in the pocket and plays 10x better. Their best drive - the one that stalled in the red zone and ended in a field goal - featured a lot of James. They never tried that again.

All that said. I think Manning's a great quarterback. Is he the greatest ever? Not yet - but I think he could be. I agree he needs to win a championship - but I don't put all the losses squarely on him. I think everyone on the Colts - defence, coaches, and Manning - all played poorly today in a game where the Steelers came more focused and ready to play. The Colts brought their B-game and paid for it. Not JUST Manning.

What I find really ridiculous are the people who make comments like, "He's arrogant... he has a sense of entitlement... he's rude..." I'm amazed that so many posters on this board know Peyton PERSONALLY and have spent enough time with him to form these opinions! Or maybe you're just making assumptions about him based on 30 second sound bytes and interviews you've seen... If that's the case, then I can assume from the idiotic posts here that all the Manning haters are just whiners who know nothign about football. Sure I don't know you all, and that probably a wrong assumption - but hey, it works for you - right?

 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J
If this was so obvious, why was it that virtually every expert who picked this game picked the Colts? Why was the line -9 Colts? I respect this Steelers team and what they were able to accomplish. It does not mean that they should have won this game today. Anyone who believes otherwise is kidding himself.
Hi Jimmy,I don't know anyone who thought it was a gimme game. Not even close. If they did, they didn't pay attention to the Bengals game with Kitna playing.

But even if one of the experts mistakenly called it a gimme game before the game, the difference is that no expert who watched the game is saying it was close to a gimme game tonight.

Anyone who thought it was close to a gimme going in were dead wrong.

But I haven't heard anyone other than you that thought this was close to a gimme game after watching this team play.

J

 
When Manning gets pressured and doesn't feel comfortable in the pocket he jumps around like rookie QB. What's even more frustrating is, why can't the coaches see this and work with him on it.
I think you just hit a major key right here. It looks awfully much like there is no real meaningful offensive coaching and certainly no quarterback coaching. I'm inclined to blame everyone on the coaching staff who deals with offense and Peyton Manning for that. I seriously think that he has taken the hype about him being a student of the game seriously and has helped create a situation around him where there are not external forces working to make him a better QB. I think it's a darn shame and that it is holding him and this team back.
 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J
If this was so obvious, why was it that virtually every expert who picked this game picked the Colts? Why was the line -9 Colts? I respect this Steelers team and what they were able to accomplish. It does not mean that they should have won this game today. Anyone who believes otherwise is kidding himself.
Hi Jimmy,I don't know anyone who thought it was a gimme game. Not even close. If they did, they didn't pay attention to the Bengals game with Kitna playing.

But even if one of the experts mistakenly called it a gimme game before the game, the difference is that no expert who watched the game is saying it was close to a gimme game tonight.

Anyone who thought it was close to a gimme going in were dead wrong.

But I haven't heard anyone other than you that thought this was close to a gimme game after watching this team play.

J
What's darn funny about this is that I just spent a solid week over at FinHeaven.com where I typically post defending the play of one Jon Kitna and the Bengals. You seem to be representing to me that the commentary on that game here was that the Steelers were an awesome team who would steamroll the hapless Colts. Fine. I may just search things out and see if that's what I get.
 
Of course it's not that simple. Football is a complicated game. There were many factors. Offensive line, defensive line, secondary, quarterback. No one deserves 100% of the blame.

It seems like a lot of posters on this board treat the play of every position outside of the offensive skill positions as a constant. It's not as simple as saying the Colts won last time, the Steelers won this time, so Manning must have done something different. Players at every other position have good and bad games too. Coaches get outcoached sometimes.

Manning's getting the vast majority of the blame here. He made a few mistakes, sure, but all things considered I thought he played well and was highly accurate when given ample time to throw. There are many, many better places to point fingers on the Colts team. Coaching, OL, DL, secondary, kicker, and so on.
Agreed, however the QB handles the ball on each offensive play except special teams, so they play a much larger role than anyone else. If Manning would have played a flawless game and they lost, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. Do you honestly feel like he deserves no criticism, especially when he also makes so many decisions on what plays they run?
 
This is not really productive anymore.We clearly can not blame Peyton for anything. Any talk of what he did or did not do to help his team is deflected towards talk about the flaws of the players surrounding him. Peyton actually started this technique in his press conference.We have one camp who thinks Peyton was hung out to dry by his Oline/kicker/defensive backs/barber.While the others question his ability to lead a team.There are various side plots and arguments, but I think that is the core of it.The problem is these points are not direct arguments with each other, so the focus just keeps getting shifted from one to the other.Did Peyton get pressured by the blitz today. Yes.Will any QB who has to win a playoff game have to deal with blitz packages all day. Yes. Example, BigBen, who had to run for his life on a play just to put a spin move on Freeney for the privilege to throw the ball away and not take a sack.I have to qualify this as solely my opinion, but I really believe that a NFL team has to have an absolute leader on the field to do well in the playoffs. This does not have to be a quarterback. It has nothing to do with the offense or the defense, and everything to do with the drive and passion that pushes a team to play above and beyond their potential when it matters most. Every team is built differently, but the Colts have obviously focused on their offense and they have made Manning the unquestionable centerpiece of that component. They all look to him and respect him.Manning is not a bad guy, by any account, but the Colts have to realize that he is fairly reserved and heavily introverted. That is not a knock on him as an NFL player by any means, but that is an issue with the Colts front office. They have thrusted him into a leadership position that he really is not suited for, and it is not Peyton's fault.How many times today did you see Peyton deep in study and Marvin isolated by himself on the sideline? The Colts need someone who suits up on Sunday to lead their team in the playoffs and they just don't have it. The Colts front office and the media are trying to force Peyton to be something that he is not. Peyton is not adept at handling the pressure of it, and that results in weak moment comments like what we heard from him today about his line.The colts need to realize Manning's limitations and play to his strengths.Manning needs to realize that he has the ability to be a significant component of a winning team, but not the leader of it (restructure that contract).

 
And to add - Pittsburgh being far from a gimme has nothing to do with the Indy discussion. It's a slap to Steeler fans to call them a gimme team. That was a VERY solid football team that beat the Bengals and then the Colts.

J
Do you seriously need to see the stats on #6 vs. #1 in the playoffs to acknowledge the point I'm making?
Hi Jimmy,I don't need to see any stats to know that Pittsburgh was nowhere remotely even in the same ball park as a gimme.

That is an outstanding and complete football team. They are peaking at the right time, have oustanding talent and are extremely well coached and motivated. They are physical, they run the ball, pass well enough to keep everyone honest, and hit people in the mouth on defense. They showed that against the Bengals and they showed that today.

I don't know if you're serious but I can in no way shape or form consider the Pittsburgh Steelers a gimme team or game.

J
If this was so obvious, why was it that virtually every expert who picked this game picked the Colts? Why was the line -9 Colts? I respect this Steelers team and what they were able to accomplish. It does not mean that they should have won this game today. Anyone who believes otherwise is kidding himself.
Hi Jimmy,I don't know anyone who thought it was a gimme game. Not even close. If they did, they didn't pay attention to the Bengals game with Kitna playing.

But even if one of the experts mistakenly called it a gimme game before the game, the difference is that no expert who watched the game is saying it was close to a gimme game tonight.

Anyone who thought it was close to a gimme going in were dead wrong.

But I haven't heard anyone other than you that thought this was close to a gimme game after watching this team play.

J
What's darn funny about this is that I just spent a solid week over at FinHeaven.com where I typically post defending the play of one Jon Kitna and the Bengals. You seem to be representing to me that the commentary on that game here was that the Steelers were an awesome team who would steamroll the hapless Colts. Fine. I may just search things out and see if that's what I get.
Hi Jimmy,Actually I'm just saying what I said. The Steelers are a VERY solid and complete football team.

Do you think they are not?

J

 
Hi Jimmy,

Actually I'm just saying what I said. The Steelers are a VERY solid and complete football team.

Do you think they are not?

J
Hi Joe,I think the Steelers are a very solid and complete football team. I also think that the team with home field faces a very solid and complete football team that makes the playoffs every single year in this round and normally beats that team. That didn't happen this time. We got the atypical result. A big part of that (though certainly not all of it) was the play of one Peyton Manning.

I think that it's sad that the people on this site seem to think that being critical of the play of a player means you're tearing down the team that player played. I'm sadder to see that apparently this type of thinking goes all the way to the top. Football is a struggle, and there are goats, chokers, and losers every single week of every single game. It seems like there is a large contingent of people around here who don't get that.

ETA: I also think too much has been said about this "gimme" concept. I stand by what I said, which is that Pittsbugh as a 6 is the biggest gimme the 1 seed ever gets. It's a truism -- I shouldn't even have to say it. I just defined what the 1 vs. 6 matchup is all about.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rhino points it out correctly, there's plenty of blame to go around. And as far Manning's comments about "protection problems", I guess the truth hurts. The Steelers had an excellent blitz package and the Colts did not pick it up. When Manning had time, he delivered. When Edge got it rolling, Manning delivered. But when the Steelers brought the house, the Colts didn't pick it up and Manning didn't have a chance.Just like Brady last night, a guy that gets nothing but respect, Manning could not do much when he constantly had to adjust his passes because some one was in his face or throwing off his back foot because he was getting knocked down again.Football is a team game. All 11 must execute. The QB can't do it all, nor can they take all the blame.

 
Of course it's not that simple. Football is a complicated game. There were many factors. Offensive line, defensive line, secondary, quarterback. No one deserves 100% of the blame.

It seems like a lot of posters on this board treat the play of every position outside of the offensive skill positions as a constant. It's not as simple as saying the Colts won last time, the Steelers won this time, so Manning must have done something different. Players at every other position have good and bad games too. Coaches get outcoached sometimes.

Manning's getting the vast majority of the blame here. He made a few mistakes, sure, but all things considered I thought he played well and was highly accurate when given ample time to throw. There are many, many better places to point fingers on the Colts team. Coaching, OL, DL, secondary, kicker, and so on.
Agreed, however the QB handles the ball on each offensive play except special teams, so they play a much larger role than anyone else. If Manning would have played a flawless game and they lost, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. Do you honestly feel like he deserves no criticism, especially when he also makes so many decisions on what plays they run?
I'd say he deserves some criticism, sure. Could he have played better? Absolutely.I'd just like to think that there are enough good football minds on this board that "Manning choked" wouldn't have to be the dominant topic after a game when he played fairly well and many other players on the Colts performed well below their capabilities.

 
I'd just like to think that there are enough good football minds on this board that "Manning choked" wouldn't have to be the dominant topic after a game when he played fairly well and many other players on the Colts performed well below their capabilities.
Actually, the topic is "Why do people hate Peyton Manning?" I will be the first to admit that by my definition, he did not choke. He came close, but he didn't. In fact, I tried to post as much in a thread somebody started called "Poll: Did Peyton Manning choke?", but somebody deleted or merged that thread before I could do so.
 
Hi Jimmy,

Actually I'm just saying what I said. The Steelers are a VERY solid and complete football team.

Do you think they are not?

J
Hi Joe,I think the Steelers are a very solid and complete football team. I also think that the team with home field faces a very solid and complete football team that makes the playoffs every single year in this round and normally beats that team. That didn't happen this time. We got the atypical result. A big part of that (though certainly not all of it) was the play of one Peyton Manning.

I think that it's sad that the people on this site seem to think that being critical of the play of a player means you're tearing down the team that player played. I'm sadder to see that apparently this type of thinking goes all the way to the top. Football is a struggle, and there are goats, chokers, and losers every single week of every single game. It seems like there is a large contingent of people around here who don't get that.

ETA: I also think too much has been said about this "gimme" concept. I stand by what I said, which is that Pittsbugh as a 6 is the biggest gimme the 1 seed ever gets. It's a truism -- I shouldn't even have to say it. I just defined what the 1 vs. 6 matchup is all about.
Hi Jimmy,Not sure what you mean about the thinking. I've spoken to disagreeing with your assessment that the Steelers were a gimme game. That thinking has nothing whatsoever to do with the play of a player or tearing down the team the player played. It has everything to do with watching what I think is a very formidable Steeler team today.

I still don't understand how you could have watched that game and called them a gimme team but we can just disagree on that.

J

 
I dont know how Joe will feel about this but as a Blogger Goon (esp. since he posted in this one.) but I have the power to delete message threads I start. This thread has gone downhill. It started well but the last 2 pages has mostly been a bunch of pissing and moaning. Way too many people not taking the "high ground" here.So I am going to end this trainwreck of a thread and close it off. My prupose in this was to have some good, HONEST, REAL talk of why so many people dislike the Manning's, and especially Peyton. Of course I dont find anything to dislike about Peyton, his brother, or his dad. But I wanted to find out what drives this hatred toward them, moreover Peyton.What I have seen is some fairly irrational responses. I myself think Peyton Manning exudes the kind of character every human should have. He isnt perfect and his postgame comments reflect that today, but I myself a fan of another AFC team for life, find him to be teh most admirable guy in the NFL. Liek I stated earlier, I am biased----we're all biased.Football is the greatest of team games. In order to win it takes all 53 guys doing their job. QBs should NEVER be judged by postseason wins and losses, unless their play changes DRASTICALLY. Manning didnt play poorly today. And in previous postseason losses in which he has played poorly, he was one of 53 team members who played poorly. What Manning has never had is a defense. Finally in 2005 he was blessed with a defense to win games. It just so happens that in the playoffs, the Colts have hit roadblocks. Notice I said THE COLTS, not merely PEYTON MANNING. He doesnt cover WRs or block DEs. He throws passes, and he does one helluva job @ it.....better than anyone else in football, including Tom Brady.Football is a team game and always will be.If you wanna piss and moan @ me for closing this thread, then PM me, I can take it. This went down the path I didnt want it to, but somehow at this minute I dont find that surprising.See you on the High Ground fellas.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top