'buck naked said:
'Chazzhawk said:
Every year we do this (I have been guilty of it too) but we put so much value in the preseason. It always seems during this 4 week period we will all falsely crown the next Jerry Rice and Barry Sanders, and we will all right off the current Frank Gores, and Roddy Whites. We always seem to forget that 4 years ago the Lions went 4 - 0 in the preseason and then went 0 - 16, and if I recall correctly the Colts were well below .500 in the preseason with Peyton Manning but they only failed to make the playoffs once or twice with him.
All I needed to see last year was Brees completing about 5 passes to Jimmy Graham in the first quarter in a game against Oakland and I knew that guy was going to be a superstar. I'd say that was a true crown. Certain things are decipherable in the preseason. You just have to be discerning.
This is misleading.There are four possible outcomes when thinking about the pre-season.
A player can have a great pre-season and then have a great season.
A player can have a bad pre-season and then have a great season.
A player can have a great pre-season and then have a bad season.
A player can have a bad pre-season and then a bad season.
Saying that Graham and Brees lit it up in the preseason, and in the regular season, therefore the pre-season has value, isn't proof of anything. A lot of Spurrier's offensive players had a great pre-season and then a bad season. IIRC, Edgerrin James didn't have a carry in the pre-season before his rookie year and then had a monster year. Peyton Manning had a bad pre-season; Ryan Leaf had a good one.
If you look for diamonds in the rough, you will find Victor Cruz but also David Clowney. But roster spots are finite, and you might drop Cam Newton -- who had a bad pre-season -- to pick up your WR flavor of the week.
Citing one example doesn't help with strategy, especially when we don't discuss the frequency of counter examples. IMO, outside of injuries and benchings, I don't give the pre-season any weight.