I think most of the time the #1 receiver is the X, but it will change with Team, offensive scheme and formation.In technical terms, what is the X, Y, Z position for a WR?Which is typically the #1 WR, or the position that gets the most looks?For example, what letter does Chris Chambers, TO, Moss, Marvin Harrison, Chad Johnson etc. play?
The BenchWhat did TO play last season with the Eagles?
Thanks.So Andy Reid said today that Stallworth will play the X position. Where does that leave Reggie Brown? And who will likely be the "number 1" WR?TO played the Z.
what he saidI think most of the time the #1 receiver is the X, but it will change with Team, offensive scheme and formation.In technical terms, what is the X, Y, Z position for a WR?Which is typically the #1 WR, or the position that gets the most looks?For example, what letter does Chris Chambers, TO, Moss, Marvin Harrison, Chad Johnson etc. play?
Think of it this way:X = Split EndIn technical terms, what is the X, Y, Z position for a WR?
Which is typically the #1 WR, or the position that gets the most looks?
For example, what letter does Chris Chambers, TO, Moss, Marvin Harrison, Chad Johnson etc. play?
Exactly right. NFL teams run combinations of patterns that work together. The Z and Y are generally on the same side of the field, and the QB's first look will generally be to that side.But the X is easier to isolate in single coverage.Think of it this way:
X = Split End
Y = TE
Z = Flanker
The flanker is usually on the same side of the formation as the TE in a typical pro set. On most teams this is who they consider their primary receiver. Now, that being said, some want their posession receiver on that side and the deep guy to fly free down the other side and some like that reversed. Depening upon who that team's WR1 is and his tendency all of that stuff changes by formation and coach's prerogative.
Excellent! Thanks!
Read the article above posted by Jayded, and it says that Stallworth will be a deep threat.Someone explain to me why Stallworth wouldn't be used as the deep threat for the birds?
That would be misleading. You would look at the list and see most Z's were the leading recievers and then start thinking that your guy is a leading reciever because he was a z. That would not always be the case. Your much better off going by the depth chart on DD.Bump. I have an idea for this thread that may shed some light on this and help us all in the long run. Let's get the entire Shark Pool to contribute to finding the assignments for each NFL team. Say you're a Cowboy fan. If you can, tell us what position 'letter' (Z, etc...) and/or 'name' (flanker, etc...) each WR is playing. If we can do this we'll have a much better idea of how these positions are used and named by each team.
The idea that people using the information will know how to use the information was meant to be implied in this idea. If anyone does what you are proposing then they have totally missed the point of the information.chris1969 said:That would be misleading. You would look at the list and see most Z's were the leading recievers and then start thinking that your guy is a leading reciever because he was a z. That would not always be the case. Your much better off going by the depth chart on DD.Bump. I have an idea for this thread that may shed some light on this and help us all in the long run. Let's get the entire Shark Pool to contribute to finding the assignments for each NFL team. Say you're a Cowboy fan. If you can, tell us what position 'letter' (Z, etc...) and/or 'name' (flanker, etc...) each WR is playing. If we can do this we'll have a much better idea of how these positions are used and named by each team.