What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Wilfork Fined for the 4th Time This Season (1 Viewer)

Not Sure

Footballguy
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3215704

Patriots' Wilfork fined $5,000 for face-mask infraction against Chargers

By Len Pasquarelli

ESPN.com

Updated: January 26, 2008, 11:43 AM ET

For the fourth time this season, New England Patriots nose tackle Vince Wilfork has been sanctioned by the league, with the latest instance a $5,000 fine for a face-mask penalty in last week's AFC Championship Game victory over the San Diego Chargers.

Wilfork called the fine -- first reported by The Boston Globe and confirmed by league and team sources -- "ridiculous," and suggested he will appeal the punishment.

"I don't want to get into it [publicly] with the NFL," Wilfork said. "They'll probably fine me or suspend me [for criticism]. That's something I'll have to take care of in the offseason."

The fourth-year veteran was fined for a play that occurred with about five minutes remaining in the first quarter last Sunday. On first-and-10 from the New England 40, Chargers running back Michael Turner carried over left guard for five yards, and Wilfork grabbed his face mask as he attempted to make the tackle.

Wilfork drew a 15-yard personal foul penalty, and the Chargers gained a first down at the Patriots 20-yard line. The possession culminated in a 26-yard field goal by Nate Kaeding, giving the Chargers a 3-0 lead.

His biggest fine of the season, for $15,000, came in the regular-season finale against the New York Giants, when he poked his finger in the face of tailback Brandon Jacobs. The Giants' tailback referenced the play earlier this week when asked about his motivation for the rematch against the Patriots in Super Bowl XLII.

Wilfork allowed that the play was "stupid," and said he didn't appeal the fine.

In earlier incidents this season, Wilfork was fined $5,000 for drawing an unsportsmanlike conduct foul during the Oct. 14 game at Dallas, when he tangled with Cowboys tight end Jason Witten.

He also drew a $12,500 fine for a low hit on Buffalo Bills quarterback J.P. Losman during a Sept. 23 game. On that play, in which Wilfork appeared to drive his arm into Losman's knee, Losman suffered a sprained knee ligament that sidelined him for two games.

He appealed both those sanctions, and the fine for the Losman hit was reduced by $2,500.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com.

 
I didn't think it looked "dirty" at the time. Penalty, yes. Dirty, no.

I'm guessing he's had some warnings from the league about similar infractions and it's based on more than just that one play.

 
I didn't think it looked "dirty" at the time. Penalty, yes. Dirty, no.I'm guessing he's had some warnings from the league about similar infractions and it's based on more than just that one play.
:thumbup: It was a freaking facemask. It was no more egregious than any other facemask I've seen. Are they gonna fine the guy for every single penalty now? He's right....it is ridiculous. No....I'm not a Pats fan either.....
 
The League is really stretching when you start issuing fines for your basic facemask penalty.
?You think the fine was just for a single facemask penalty? If any player(that hadn't already been fined for poor sportsmanship multiple times) do you think they would have gotten the same fine?
 
The League is really stretching when you start issuing fines for your basic facemask penalty.
?You think the fine was just for a single facemask penalty? If any player(that hadn't already been fined for poor sportsmanship multiple times) do you think they would have gotten the same fine?
So because of past transgressions, every facemask penalty in the future will result in a fine? Yeah, that makes sense because you know the facemask occurred because he is a dirty player.
 
Repeat offenders get dinged for stuff that players with no history of dirty play wouldn't. It has always been this way. Would the horse-collar on McNabb have drawn a suspension if it was committed by anyone other than Roy Williams?

 
The League is really stretching when you start issuing fines for your basic facemask penalty.
?You think the fine was just for a single facemask penalty? If any player(that hadn't already been fined for poor sportsmanship multiple times) do you think they would have gotten the same fine?
So because of past transgressions, every facemask penalty in the future will result in a fine? Yeah, that makes sense because you know the facemask occurred because he is a dirty player.
Link to anyone saying it'll be a fine for "every facemask penalty in the future"? For the rest of the season, I'd guess yes.Again, your making your point that this one play doesn't demonstrate he's a dirty player(which I think is kind of odd because it seems like we all agree on that) but you're not acknowledging his punishment isn't being based on that one play. Do I think he'll get less lee-way from here on out from the NFL? Absolutely.

If Tom Brady gets a DUI and Pacman Jones get a DUI tonight, I doubt very much the penalty handed down by the NFL will be the same for the same infraction.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top