Mister CIA
Footballguy
Asking for a friend.
I could see this. At the very least, it will play more and more into projectors' projections.Asking for a friend.
I could see this. At the very least, it will play more and more into projectors' projections.Asking for a friend.
I agree. AI will take over the statistics and projections aspect. AI won't be able to take over player/prospect evaluations.I could see this. At the very least, it will play more and more into projectors' projections.Asking for a friend.
This seems to be the MO for chatgtp in general. Anything in the past few years gets hazy on the details. But with how quickly it's already advanced we might be getting play by play as soon as the playoffs.
Or the 3rd outcome where skynet is born and terminators show up shortly thereafterMy guess is if AI is successful at these things we'll either have a great new source for info or need to find a new hobby.
Been waiting my whole life for this momentOr the 3rd outcome where skynet is born and terminators show up shortly thereafterMy guess is if AI is successful at these things we'll either have a great new source for info or need to find a new hobby.
AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
So where are you getting good data analysis in FF? In theory for AI to worthwhile, it would have to check the accuracy of the data and I'm not sure the sample sizes are large enough to distinguish between accuracy and luck.AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
Boy I dunno. Some of the things it can do now are amazing, and it's getting amazinger with every iteration. At some point in the not too distant future I can see it picking up nearly all data analysis in just about every industry.
Thanks for sharing your opinion.AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
The real question is "would you even notice if it was?"Followup: Will AI replace sports journalism?
How could it not?
Might be like some of the AI term papers that have been submitted. Probably better than the real thing.The real question is "would you even notice if it was?"Followup: Will AI replace sports journalism?
How could it not?
AI won't be able to take over player/prospect evaluations.
Thanks for sharing your opinion.AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
I just can't wrap my head around AI overcoming a developers bias. In the case of fantasy football to get a good result, AI would need to analyze not only the web, but every TV show, radio show, and social media platform and then accurately weight that information. How it's going to differentiate between the guy who started the Anquan Bolden thread in early August and the guy who started the Marshall Faulk ball cancer thread?
You can wind up a toy, but when you put it down it's still has to face some direction.
Won't the AI figure out which data points are relevant and which aren't?AI will do everything in the next few years. So yes.
In my opinion the sharks will be shifting through the deluge of data that we'll be able to throw at AI to find what data points are relevant and what aren't, while everyone else is caught up in what is most reshared.
The only working against it is the anti-nerd faction of football. Many are resistant to analytics. Those people are just as likely to be resistant to AI.AI will absolutely dramatically impact fantasy sports. It's almost the perfect industry to be disrupted.
I live in the AI world so I may be a bit biased, but I don't think there's any question about this. Just look at the evolution trends of ff analysis. It is inevitable.
I'm not sure the sample size with a 17 game season is enough, especially when one in game coin flip decision can impact the rest of the game. Then you throw in new wrinkles like the QB rugby scrum or an NFL rules change and the models have to be reworked with limit samples once again. Lastly, you have coaches doing dumb things that I'm not sure AI can account for.Won't the AI figure out which data points are relevant and which aren't?AI will do everything in the next few years. So yes.
In my opinion the sharks will be shifting through the deluge of data that we'll be able to throw at AI to find what data points are relevant and what aren't, while everyone else is caught up in what is most reshared.
if AI can’t find it, how are people?I'm not sure the sample size with a 17 game season is enough, especially when one in game coin flip decision can impact the rest of the game. Then you throw in new wrinkles like the QB rugby scrum or an NFL rules change and the models have to be reworked with limit samples once again. Lastly, you have coaches doing dumb things that I'm not sure AI can account for.Won't the AI figure out which data points are relevant and which aren't?AI will do everything in the next few years. So yes.
In my opinion the sharks will be shifting through the deluge of data that we'll be able to throw at AI to find what data points are relevant and what aren't, while everyone else is caught up in what is most reshared.
The only working against it is the anti-nerd faction of football. Many are resistant to analytics. Those people are just as likely to be resistant to AI.AI will absolutely dramatically impact fantasy sports. It's almost the perfect industry to be disrupted.
I live in the AI world so I may be a bit biased, but I don't think there's any question about this. Just look at the evolution trends of ff analysis. It is inevitable.
It already has to some degree. AP uses game recaps written by AI. Feed it box scores, play-by-play and historical data and can spit out a simple story as well as a human.Followup: Will AI replace sports journalism?
How could it not?
So AI has already made you obsolete?AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
I think you are overestimating these machines. They only know what they are told. Maybe dogs will rule the worldThanks for sharing your opinion.AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
I just can't wrap my head around AI overcoming a developers bias. In the case of fantasy football to get a good result, AI would need to analyze not only the web, but every TV show, radio show, and social media platform and then accurately weight that information. How it's going to differentiate between the guy who started the Anquan Bolden thread in early August and the guy who started the Marshall Faulk ball cancer thread?
You can wind up a toy, but when you put it down it's still has to face some direction.
I think you are underestimating the machine-learning aspect of this technology. Not saying AI is going to take over in 2023, but as it becomes massively more deployed over the next 3-5+ years, it will learn how to do what the industry is now doing with an army of decentralized humans, but at the speed of light. That's if its military-AI cousins don't kill us all first.
So AI has already made you obsolete?AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
I think you are overestimating these machines. They only know what they are told. Maybe dogs will rule the world
It was a joke. Didn't mean to offendSo AI has already made you obsolete?AI talk is over blown. I will believe it when I see it. And I'm a software engineer
You ready to make a bet big man
I think you are both right, but both looking at different aspects of AI. AI is a large domain and can mean different things to different people. I'm working with AI in a couple different ways currently, data processing/analysis and next generation image processing.I think you are overestimating these machines. They only know what they are told. Maybe dogs will rule the world
And I think you are underestimating it.
AI uses code/algorithms to analyze data.
It is becoming increasingly powerful and will have a profound impact on how we live over the next century and beyond.
1. They don't. FF is largely luck.if AI can’t find it, how are people?I'm not sure the sample size with a 17 game season is enough, especially when one in game coin flip decision can impact the rest of the game. Then you throw in new wrinkles like the QB rugby scrum or an NFL rules change and the models have to be reworked with limit samples once again. Lastly, you have coaches doing dumb things that I'm not sure AI can account for.Won't the AI figure out which data points are relevant and which aren't?AI will do everything in the next few years. So yes.
In my opinion the sharks will be shifting through the deluge of data that we'll be able to throw at AI to find what data points are relevant and what aren't, while everyone else is caught up in what is most reshared.
Yeah, because Watson does such a good job.
If a personality has alot of videos and audios for AI training, there is a potential for unlimited podcasts using technology recently created for influencers. An example, Caryn Marjorie with the help of Forever Companions. Imagine the potential for those who can't get enough of Simmons or Le Betard.The other thing is, the fantasy podcasts I listen to are like 50% for the info and 50% for their personality. There's lots of people out there with similar info. It's about delivery.
If that's the case, it will water down the market so much I probably wouldn't bother. What is the point if we can just create an infinite number of Bill Simmons podcasts or if we can make a new Drake album every week?If a personality has alot of videos and audios for AI training, there is a potential for unlimited podcasts using technology recently created for influencers. An example, Caryn Marjorie with the help of Forever Companions. Imagine the potential for those who can't get enough of Simmons or Le Betard.The other thing is, the fantasy podcasts I listen to are like 50% for the info and 50% for their personality. There's lots of people out there with similar info. It's about delivery.
There has to be audio and video for training in the first place, so there is a need for humans. At this point in time. Can AI create a new and popular personality? Or a new Drake album on demand? Perhaps. Ownership is an issue.If that's the case, it will water down the market so much I probably wouldn't bother. What is the point if we can just create an infinite number of Bill Simmons podcasts or if we can make a new Drake album every week?