Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Will playing on bad teams in the 2nd half of Randy Moss's career k (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter fenwah
- Start date
TitusIII
Footballguy
No, and barring Moss being arrested for Murder, you're on crack if you think he isn't a lock at this point in time.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/MossRa00.htm
He has been considered the best, or one of the best WR's in football since the day he stepped on the field.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/MossRa00.htm
He has been considered the best, or one of the best WR's in football since the day he stepped on the field.
Last edited by a moderator:
Warpig
Footballguy
jurb26
Footballguy
Yet still 2 of 6 people around here voted yes...
The NFL celebrates murderers. Allegedly.
Jiggyonthehut
Footballguy
The real question here is whether it may keep him from being, if not the best, one of the most elite recievers in history.
I vote yes.
I vote yes.
shamrock84
Footballguy
Actually no that wasn't the question.
TitusIII
Footballguy
4 people are moronsYet still 2 of 6 people around here voted yes...
BlueOnion
Footballguy
Randy Moss has established himself as arguably one of the greatest offensive weapon the game has ever seen. Sure he is not the best route runner, may not have the best hands and may not be the best teammate. But being 6'4, running a 4.2 40yd and having world class leaping ability; he was the ultimate weapon. He impacted the game like no other player before him.
People who critize Randy Moss for dominating the game with his physical ability alone mysteriously change their tune when talking about Babe Ruth's physical gifts or Wilt Chamberlain's physical gifts. Do you really think Shaq would have been the same dominant center if he were 6'5?
People who critize Randy Moss for dominating the game with his physical ability alone mysteriously change their tune when talking about Babe Ruth's physical gifts or Wilt Chamberlain's physical gifts. Do you really think Shaq would have been the same dominant center if he were 6'5?
ImTheScientist
Footballguy
No, his lack of work ethic will. You can not play deep into a carreer without a good work ethic.
BlueOnion
Footballguy
I find a comparison of Randy Moss to Eric Dickerson quite compelling. Both players dominated their first 6\7 years in the year like no player before them (Dickerson > Jim Brown, Randy Moss > Jerry Rice). Both players were traded after their great starts (to their careers). Both players had at least 1 more good year for their new team. Dickerson eventually faded out of the league (playing for Oakland and Atlanta) but still finished towards the top of the all-time rushing list. Moss should finish towards the top of the all-time receiving list.
If Dickerson made it, I suspect Moss will make it as well.
If Dickerson made it, I suspect Moss will make it as well.
sinatravolta
Footballguy
Agreed. I don't think playing on bad teams will have anything to do with it. He probably makes the Hall, but if he doesn't it will be because he puts up mediocre numbers and fades away early because he's not working/trying very hard and his legacy becomes in large part wasted talent.
fenwah
Footballguy
That's what I mean...if he continues to put up mediocre numbers on these crappy teams...does he belong in the NFL HoF? My opinion is no...he does not.
sinatravolta
Footballguy
This could be true - but putting up 6/7 dominating years to me is more impressive for an RB than a WR. There's less wear and tear on a WR's body.
Similar threads
