You're probably right.i get most here don't get sprinting
I wouldn't say the issue of race is entirely irrelevant in this instance.Sure. Its a noteworthy news feat and there isn't a max number of threads that can be started. So cool - good for the kid.
I just don't understand why his race/ethnicity was brought into it. That seems entirely irrelevant.
If you are confused over a 100m dash, I doubt anything that can be said could help you.You're probably right.
Could you please explain the entire concept of "several people running as fast as possible towards and objective and the first person to reach that objective is declared the winner." This is a very complex sporting event for sure.
The big story is this...WHITE USA SPRINTER RUNS A SUB10.00. Which had never been done. Yes race is the story here. The HS thing secondary.I wouldn't say the issue of race is entirely irrelevant in this instance.
I AM totally confused.If you are confused over a 100m dash, I doubt anything that can be said could help you.
According to folks in the link you posted (for what it's worth), that is not accurate.The big story is this...WHITE USA SPRINTER RUNS A SUB10.00. Which had never been done. Yes race is the story here. The HS think secondary.
It appears a 100m sprint is a bit too complex for ya McJose, Google....the 100 meters....and read.I AM totally confused.
So these competitors run for a distance of 100 meters? Did I get that right?
Does the route aways have to be in a straight line or can it be curved or angled?
Would it be possible for the racers to run 50 meters in one direction and then run back in the other direction for a total of 100 meters?
Could a racer run ten 10 meter lengths and then add up the times to determine his 100 meter time?
So what is accurate?According to folks in the link you posted (for what it's worth), that is not accurate.
Because nearly all national and international sprinting records, including on the high school level, are held by black athletes. So the kid being white adds a surprising aspect to his feat which many people find interesting due to its novelty.I just don't understand why his race/ethnicity was brought into it. That seems entirely irrelevant.
I knew somebody here would get it.Because nearly all national and international sprinting records, including on the high school level, are held by black athletes. So the kid being white adds a surprising aspect to his feat which many people find interesting due to its novelty.
I've seen several comments from what appear to be black commenters on other sites saying something to the effect of "That white boy is fast!" regarding Boling. Should they also be admonished for noticing that Boling's race is different than nearly all his top competitors?
Can I complain about the thread title? If it would have said anything like “white high school track” I never would have clicked.It's a bizarre character trait to complain that a thread was started. If you're not interested in the topic or if the topic offends you why not move to a thread where you can comment positively on a topic you're interested in rather than negatively on a topic you're not interested in, but others may be. There's a reason why that particular video of that kid setting a new high school world record has nearly 59,00 views, 230 comments (nearly all of which are positive), and all track and field publications are covering it -- because his feat is newsworthy.
Far dumber and more pointless topics have received their own thread on this site.
According to your link, that four other white sprinters have run sub-10 seconds on the 100m dash. But I guess none of them were American? If so, I guess you're right.So what is accurate?
Yes, and pointing it out is as controversial as mud. What you don't account for is the degree to which race acts as a deterrent to attempt to enter or participate rather than a predetermining trait or thing. See: European basketball players and the NBA.Let's talk speedy, quick, elusive white running backs, go ahead. Who is that 220 pound white running back with 4.5 jets, who?
See why when someone unusual shows up it's news?
The big news is.....White USA sprinter breaks 10.00.....and for that to be just some HS kid....wow~According to your link, that four other white sprinters have run sub-10 seconds on the 100m dash. But I guess none of them were American? If so, I guess you're right.
I always looked at you as a guy who took this suff WAY too seriously, how about just relaxing a bit guy, ok? Talk a little track, music, whatever, stop worrying about what others do, alright?This is how these threads always go with Zeno for anybody not paying attention. Eventually it comes down to really dated notions of "common sense" when it comes to athletics and "old school" when it comes to sociopolitical issues and the like. It's a drag.
It's predictable how these threads go (BECAUSE HE STARTS A ####### ####-TON OF THEM) when the subject is white or black.
Dude, that's great that you look at me that way. You have no idea how communities form, how to elicit a response, how to know when to break a rule, etc.I always looked at you as a guy who took this suff WAY too seriously, how about just relaxing a bit guy, ok? Talk a little track, music, whatever, stop worrying about what others do, alright?
Dude, chill, ok?
I think I would be good at this one. Just give me a couple hour time frame to work with.a racer run ten 10 meter lengths and then add up the times to determine his 100 meter time?
Talking speed and size here.Yes, and pointing it out is as controversial as mud. What you don't account for is the degree to which race acts as a deterrent to attempt to enter rather than as a predetermined thing. See: European basketball players and the NBA.
Leamon. His name was Leamon King.Delano's Lemon King
Lemon King
Yes. European basketball players had the combination of the speed and size necessary for basketball that people thought white athletes lacked for decades. What people didn't ever consider was the barriers to entry and the seeking out of other sports and positions, on average, more likely to suit white athletes rather than attempt to individuate and judge each individual based on just that -- the individual. This seeking out of other sports more suited to bodies of European descent affected white participation in basketball or white prominence in the edges and backs of football.Talking speed and size here.
You really do need to just have fun this stuff guy, it really isn't all that, ok guy?Dude, that's great that you look at me that way. You have no idea how communities form, how to elicit a response, how to know when to break a rule, etc.
I'm not worried about what you do anymore, you simply now annoy me with your redundancy and predictability. I'm very chill.
Yeah...sure guy, ok.You really do need to just have fun this stuff guy, it really isn't all that, ok guy?
See where I say....based on a true story.....Lemon sounds better.Leamon. His name was Leamon King.
I wasn't referring to the part about track & field.Yes it is, you just need to expand your interests.
When talking sprinting the difference between those with roots to western Africa and the rest of the world is totally dramatic, far bigger gap than any other sport.Yes. European basketball players had the combination of the speed and size necessary for basketball that people thought white athletes lacked for decades. What people didn't ever consider was the barriers to entry and the seeking out of other sports and positions, on average, more likely to suit white athletes rather than attempt to individuate and judge each individual based on just that -- the individual. This seeking out of other sports more suited to bodies of European descent affected white participation in basketball or white prominence in the edges and backs of football.
The same can be said of baseball and hockey and barriers to entry, be they physical or sociopolitical (cost and space, etc.)
And instead of....havevbeen....how about...have been.Instead of using the word "guy", the shark move would havevbeen to use the word "chief".
TONS...of track athletes and fans out there TONS!!!!!I wasn't referring to the part about track & field.
This has been covered for decades about the difference between West and East Africa and the so-called fast and slow-twitch muscles assigned to each region, race, and continent. But individuation, mixed with multiracial offspring, has muddied the waters and lessened the absoluteness of any broad categorical judgment. Indeed, even if we are to take as given that:When talking sprinting the difference between those with roots to western Africa and the rest of the world is totally dramatic, far bigger gap than any other sport.
Alright, let's extend that train of thought. Basketball is wildly popular in China. Chinese boys grow up playing basketball, and China has a 20 team professional basketball league that has produced a handful of NBA players. So both the participation and the "seeing someone who looks like me excelling" factors have been filled. Why don't we see more Chinese players in the NBA since so many people in the world's most populous nation participate in basketball?Yes, and pointing it out is as controversial as mud. What you don't account for is the degree to which race acts as a deterrent to attempt to enter or participate rather than a predetermining trait or thing. See: European basketball players and the NBA.
Good catch Bub.And instead of....havevbeen....how about...have been.
See how silly that kind of thing is?
Social pressures and artificial constructs regarding sport play a large role in who participates. See Malcolm Gladwell's study of the Canadian National Junior Hockey Team and birthdays, for instance. Something as simple as being born in January was statistically significant given the age cutoffs at youth levels and physical development, where early development served to benefit the January babies while weeding out the later ones from participating due to a lack of prowess because of the timeline of average physical development.Alright, let's extend that train of thought. Basketball is wildly popular in China. Chinese boys grow up playing basketball, and China has a 20 team professional basketball league that has produced a handful of NBA players. So both the participation and the "seeing someone who looks like me excelling" factors have been filled. Why don't we see more Chinese players in the NBA since so many people in the world's most populous nation participate in basketball?
And are white boys really deterred from participating in high school track? There's undoubtedly more white high school track athletes in America than there are black high school track athletes, but the black sprinters still dominate at the national level. Just is what it is.
Perhaps, but we still have more white high school students than black high school students participating in track in America, and it's always been that way. So some supposed lack of white participation in high school track isnt't leading to lack of whites excelling at the highest level of sprints like, say, lack of historical black participation in hockey led to a lack of black players in the NHL.Social pressures and artificial constructs regarding sport play a large role in who participates.
I respectfully disagree, but you're entitled to your opinion.Do blacks lack the faculties necessary to play quarterback, as was thought for decades even while football was integrated? Yes.
Would you concede that there's also likely genetics at work here?There are subtler pressures likely at work here.
Oh wow. That was a "no." Check the edit. I meant to, in the flow of the sentence say that blacks are eminently qualified to play quarterback. Whoops.I respectfully disagree...
To a degree, yes. I think we can admit that human beings tend to cluster around certain averages by race while also not denying that there are real social pressures regarding participation in certain events and entry into certain positions and games. There are always outliers, and I think they're more common than we think.Would you concede that there's also likely genetics at work here?
What is it about the greatest running backs....This has been covered for decades about the difference between West and East Africa and the so-called fast and slow-twitch muscles assigned to each region, race, and continent. But individuation, mixed with multiracial offspring, has muddied the waters and lessened the absoluteness of any broad categorical judgment. Indeed, even if we are to take as given that:
we are forgetting that individuals are outliers from the average almost all the time, especially among males.
- races are easily delineated
- they are not socially constructed and
- tend to have tendencies that cluster around an average as far as heritable physical and/or intellectual traits
You are telling me those quicks, agility, elusiveness we see from a Gale Sayers, Devin Hester, Marshall Faulk, O.J.Simpson, Tyreek Hill, isn't ALL about genetics? Huh????To a degree, yes. I think we can admit that human beings tend to cluster around certain averages by race while also not denying that there are real social pressures regarding participation in certain events and entry into certain positions and games. There are always outliers, and I think they're more common than we think.
I knew it. He farted out of the starting blocks for extra propulsion, didn't he?Yep, this is why it's newsworthy.
Edited to add: It was a wind-aided race. Per the Houston Chronicle, "[t]he 4.2 mph wind prevents it from counting officially as a national record, but it's the fastest open 100 time in all conditions in high school history."