James Daulton
Footballguy
I could almost picture my wife doing the same thing. I know I know but if these chicks have any bombastic personality at all, and they hate Trump, oof that's a bad combination.That lady's husband .... Poor ******* lol
I could almost picture my wife doing the same thing. I know I know but if these chicks have any bombastic personality at all, and they hate Trump, oof that's a bad combination.That lady's husband .... Poor ******* lol
Planning has apparently begun for another big protest on April 15.Just checking in, it's been a few days now, did the women get their rights back that Trump took from them or can we expect another protest soon?
Good. Can you imagine all the rights that will be taken from them by then? They probably won't be allowed to go outside without their bodies and faces covered by then. Although I'm not sure that's worthy of a protest, that's no where near as bad as someone saying women let him grab them like 10 or 15 years ago.Planning has apparently begun for another big protest on April 15.
"Just checking in, it's been a few days now, did the black people get their jobs and freedom or can we expect another protest soon?"Just checking in, it's been a few days now, did the women get their rights back that Trump took from them or can we expect another protest soon?
Or when they get called out for whining more than a woman, they take their ball and go home (I.e. Cry to a mod until they give out a ban). I got a timeout because Ramblin Wreck reported me because I said he whined more than a womanI've seen this a lot too ... When an iStalker creeps around and stalks someone then pretends they aren't stalking, acting all incredulous that someone would even bring it up: "Stalking? Lil' O'l me? Why I do declare!". Please, we all know your game.
And who are you referring to with this term "Trumpkin"? Me?You got the wrong poster, @Loves You. I don't defend the Donald. I simply point out the incredible HYPOCRISY of the left.
Hypocrisy? Indeed, snowflake
You are better than this TF"Just checking in, it's been a few days now, did the black people get their jobs and freedom or can we expect another protest soon?"
-Card Trader, August 31, 1963.
He's signing an executive order today taking away their right to drive and then he's rounding up anyone with an alternative lifestyle .Just checking in, it's been a few days now, did the women get their rights back that Trump took from them or can we expect another protest soon?
They're your words, my friend. All I did was swap "women" with "black people" and "rights" with "jobs and freedom." Next time maybe clean up the trolling a bit?You are better than this TF
Then they aren't my words, with all your swapping. Having trouble answering my question? Did they get their rights back? Comparing today's women with civil rights era African Americans is about as weak as anything you've posted on here. Try harder and clean up your snark a bitThey're your words, my friend. All I did was swap "women" with "black people" and "rights" with "jobs and freedom." Next time maybe clean up the trolling a bit?
With friends like this.....They're your words, my friend. All I did was swap "women" with "black people" and "rights" with "jobs and freedom." Next time maybe clean up the trolling a bit?
No, they didn't. And I wasn't comparing the two, I was highlighting the extraordinary stupidity of your question. Did you ask the Tea Party marchers if they'd succeeded in reducing federal spending three days after their 2009 march?Then they aren't my words, with all your swapping. Having trouble answering my question? Did they get their rights back? Comparing today's women with civil rights era African Americans is about as weak as anything you've posted on here. Try harder and clean up your snark a bit
Protesting their taxes?Planning has apparently begun for another big protest on April 15.
Can we get a quick synopsis of the rights Trump has taken from them that they want back? I know the list will be super long but maybe you could put all the issues in a Google doc or something so we don't overload the FBG servers.No, they didn't. And I wasn't comparing the two, I was highlighting the extraordinary stupidity of your question. Did you ask the Tea Party marchers if they'd succeeded in reducing federal spending three days after their 2009 march?
Seems like something the administration will attempt to spin into an anti-tax/IRS protest
Now you're the one not answering my question- did you ask the Tea Partiers if they had succeeded in reducing federal spending three days after their march? If not, why not?Can we get a quick synopsis of the rights Trump has taken from them that they want back? I know the list will be super long but maybe you could put all the issues in a Google doc or something so we don't overload the FBG servers.
Christ I was joking. Breaking news: rich people take advantage of tax loopholes. Trump admitted that in the debate when he told Hillary he took advantage of the laws she helped create.
I'm sure Trump and Congressional Republicans will get right to work closing those loopholes that benefit the wealthy.Christ I was joking. Breaking news: rich people take advantage of tax loopholes. Trump admitted that in the debate when he told Hillary he took advantage of the laws she helped create.
I was just trying to extend an olive branch in hopes he'd actually answer the question. But that appears to have not worked and he keeps dodging it. I think we all know why...When?
Yes, we do. Because you refused to answer his question.I was just trying to extend an olive branch in hopes he'd actually answer the question. But that appears to have not worked and he keeps dodging it. I think we all know why...
Yep. They'll do as much as obama and the democratic congress did. Which is nothing because the laws benefit them.I'm sure Trump and Congressional Republicans will get right to work closing those loopholes that benefit the wealthy.
Person A asks a question, Person B doesn't answer it then asks a question of their own. Person A is the one that is "refusing". Good old liberal logic!Yes, we do. Because you refused to answer his question.
So this really was just a whining protest because they lost? Not really anything to do with women's rights or empowerment, just upset that they lost....For what it's worth, I'm not sure that I saw very many signs on Saturday about specific womens' rights that Trump was planning to take away. I guess there were some pro-choice signs, but those were dwarfed by the number of plain old anti-Trump signs.
You're better than this. Come on.I was just trying to extend an olive branch in hopes he'd actually answer the question. But that appears to have not worked and he keeps dodging it. I think we all know why...
Judd had to be in full blown actress mode for the crowd or she is mentally unstable.Agreed. Even if you are very anti-Trump, you have to be off the rails to get behind much of what she said. Like you said, she sounded deranged.
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/search/You're better than this. Come on.
Here's your answer.
Your turn: did you ask the tea partiers if they succeeded in reducing federal spending three days after their march in 2009? And if the answer is no, why not?
People went for a lot of different reasons. I wouldn't use the word "whining." But yeah, I'd say the most dominant reason for people attending the march was to express their antipathy towards Trump in a public way.So this really was just a whining protest because they lost? Not really anything to do with women's rights or empowerment, just upset that they lost....
Ironically they're going to get so sick of winningSo this really was just a whining protest because they lost? Not really anything to do with women's rights or empowerment, just upset that they lost....
Why not just answer the question? Be collaborative, and engage in a meaningful discussion. Don't troll with a
you're better, right?I don't see any posts from you asking the same question of the tea party marchers three days after their march in 2009. Maybe that's due to the limitations of the search, but if not can you explain why you are holding the women's march to a different standard?
I didn't say anything about the tea party, during or after their marches. I didn't need to because they had a clear message and I could easily tell that their goal wasn't accomplished 3 days after. Since no one can seem to explain the goal of this march/protest/whinefest, you get people asking questions. Mission accomplished?I don't see any posts from you asking the same question of the tea party marchers three days after their march in 2009. Maybe that's due to the limitations of the search, but if not can you explain why you are holding the women's march to a different standard?
As you know I've had nice things to say about you in the past. I'd hate to think I was wrong and that you're just a Trump troll like some of our other friends here. Whaddya say, GB? I answered your question. I did use LMGTFY, so be snarky if you like, but at least extend the same courtesy I extended to you.
So I followed your link. From what I read the march was basically mirroring talking points of the DNC platform.You're better than this. Come on.
Here's your answer.
Your turn: did you ask the tea partiers if they succeeded in reducing federal spending three days after their march in 2009? And if the answer is no, why not?
When the truth hurts, put it on ignore!Or when they get called out for whining more than a woman, they take their ball and go home (I.e. Cry to a mod until they give out a ban). I got a timeout because Ramblin Wreck reported me because I said he whined more than a womanHypocrisy? Indeed, snowflake
![]()
Ive said it before and I'll say it again ... don't flatter yo'self. In fact, you've made it to ignore. Congrats! :confetti:
ETA: you're so vain to think it was calling you out specifically.
It's very weak.Then they aren't my words, with all your swapping. Having trouble answering my question? Did they get their rights back? Comparing today's women with civil rights era African Americans is about as weak as anything you've posted on here. Try harder and clean up your snark a bit
Weird YOU would say this. In fact, the irony is so thick you could spread it with a knife.Why not just answer the question? Be collaborative, and engage in a meaningful discussion. Don't troll with ayou're better, right?
Or when they get called out for whining more than a woman, they take their ball and go home (I.e. Cry to a mod until they give out a ban). I got a timeout because Ramblin Wreck reported me because I said he whined more than a womanHypocrisy? Indeed, snowflake
![]()
Ive said it before and I'll say it again ... don't flatter yo'self. In fact, you've made it to ignore. Congrats! :confetti:
ETA: you're so vain to think it was calling you out specifically.
I didn't hit the report button once. You got a timeout probably because of your own behavior and comments and maybe because of stalking me for over a month now. I've even asked you to put me on ignore because I clearly get under your skin but like trump, you respond to everything and then blame someone else. I guess. A simple google search gave you plenty of articles and interviews where people discussed what they hoped to accomplish. If you're genuinely curious you can obviously read them, or like I said you can read back through the thread to get the thoughts of your fellow FBGs on what was/hopefully will be accomplished.I didn't say anything about the tea party, during or after their marches. I didn't need to because they had a clear message and I could easily tell that their goal wasn't accomplished 3 days after. Since no one can seem to explain the goal of this march/protest/whinefest, you get people asking questions. Mission accomplished?
This literally took me 15 seconds to find.  I guess. A simple google search gave you plenty of articles and interviews where people discussed what they hoped to accomplish. .