What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

World's Greatest Draft (1 Viewer)

Hard to argue with Augustus Caesar as the #1 Leader of all time. Rome has such lasting influence on human culture, even so many centuries after it's destruction.

 
Augustus is a great pick, but he did not inherit his fathers empire.He was adopted by his Great Uncle, who has yet to be picked
And quite frankly, its not hard to argue that Alexander's empire was more influential. Afterall, the language of the Roman Empire wasn't Latin, it was Koine Greek.
Perhaps. But Alexander was a greater general than leader. All he did was march and conquer. He didn't stop until a year or two before he died. Hell, he didn't even make it back home. He died at the age of 33 in Babylon, if my memory is correct. His empire might have been more influential, but it was much shorter lived. The reason for its short lifespan was it depended on nonstop expansion. He did very little in the way of infrastructure and civics - he just conquered. As soon as the mighty general died, the armies dispersed among his generals, and the empire folded. Not so with Augustus' empire.
I would also like to add that there are plenty more major empires than the ones taught in your average 8th grade ancient history class.
 
So far to me, in the very early rounds, nobody is having a better draft than Mad Sweeney.

Newton and Augustus could have been the first two people selected in the entire draft, and I wouldn't have had any problem with it.

 
I still think there's at least one pretty clear 1a/1b selection in this draft, possibly 2. More importantly, there are a TON of selections that are pretty clear top 5 selections in each category. IMO, the ability to grab enough of these people in the next several rounds will determine more than any other factor the winner of this draft.

 
For the record, PM was sent to DougB within moments of my pick.
He was around for a long time :mellow:
Doug B said in the G.A.D. he generally goes on autoskip for these drafts (you may 'see' him in the thread or FFA, but just as likely he has it opened and minimized).IIRC, however, he did not want to be skipped in this one, at least for now.
Even if he wanted to, there's to be no skipping until Monday.
 
For the record, PM was sent to DougB within moments of my pick.
He was around for a long time :mellow:
Doug B said in the G.A.D. he generally goes on autoskip for these drafts (you may 'see' him in the thread or FFA, but just as likely he has it opened and minimized).IIRC, however, he did not want to be skipped in this one, at least for now.
Definitely not until there's a clock. He said in the first round that he didn't mind only me skipping him just once to keep the draft moving.
 
And now, it's become a game of guessing who's most likely to slip ... and figuring out that if someone doesn't slip, in which category it will it hurt the least. Therefore:

2.12 - Julius Caesar, Military Leader

Read more on the Military career of Julius Caesar

Gaius Julius Caesar ( 13 July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC), was a Roman military and political leader. He played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.

Historians place the generalship of Caesar as one of the greatest military strategists and tacticians who ever lived, along with Alexander the Great, Sun Tzu, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon Bonaparte. [His] tactical brilliance was highlighted by such feats as his circumvallation** of Alesia during the Gallic War, the rout of [another Roman general's] numerically superior forces at Pharsalus during the Civil War, and the complete destruction of [another foregin leader's] army at Battle of Zela.

Caesar's successful campaigning in any terrain and under all weather conditions owes much to the strict but fair discipline of his legionaries, whose admiration and devotion to him were proverbial due to his promotion of those of skill over those of nobility. Caesar's infantry and cavalry were first rate, and he made heavy use of formidable Roman artillery and his army's superlative engineering abilities. There was also the legendary speed with which he manoeuvred his troops; Caesar's army sometimes marched as many as 40 miles (64 km) a day.

Julius Caesar's Commentaries on the Gallic Wars describe how, during the siege of one Gallic city built on a very steep and high plateau, his engineers tunnelled through solid rock, found the source of the spring from which the town was drawing its water supply, and diverted it to the use of the army. The town, cut off from their water supply, capitulated at once.

Caesar also [employed an early form of battlefield cryptography], a cipher system to communicate with his generals which has now come to be known as the Caesar cipher.

** Investment, circumvallation, contravallation: Investment is the military tactic of surrounding an enemy fort (or town) with armed forces to prevent entry or escape.

A circumvallation is a line of fortifications, built by the attackers around the besieged fortification facing towards the enemy fort (to protect itself from sorties by its defenders and to enhance the blockade) ... The line of circumvallation can be used as a base for launching assaults against the besieged city or for constructing further earthworks nearer the city.

In cases where the besieging army is threatened by a field army allied to the enemy fort, the besieging army may construct a contravallation, a second line of fortifications outside the circumvallation, facing away from the enemy fort. The contravallation protects the besigers from attacks by allies of the city's defenders and enhances the blockade of the enemy fort by making it more difficult to smuggle in supplies.

The Siege of Alesia which took place in September 52 BC is one of the most famous investments in history. Julius Caesar in his Commentaries on the Gallic War describes his textbook use of the circumvallation and contravallation to defeat the Gauls ... The basic objectives and tactics of a military investment have remained the same down to today.
Roman battles fought by Julius Caesar:

Gallic War

58 BC:

June – Battle of the Arar (Saone): Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

July – Battle of Bibracte: Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

57 BC:

Battle of the Axona (Aisne): Caesar engages and defeats the Belgae

Battle of the Sabis (Sambre): Caesar defeats the Nervii.

52 BC:

Avaricum: Caesar takes this city by siege

Battle of Gergovia: [The Gauls] successfully stave of Caesar's siege with the help of a broken alliance.

Battle of Alesia: Caesar lays siege to Alesia and is simultaneously lain under siege by the [Gauls]; Caesar eventually defeats [the Gauls]

51 BC

Battle of Uxellodunum: Caesar lays siege to Uxellodunum, the last Gallic outpost in open revolt

Roman Civil War

48 BC:

July 10 – Battle of Dyrrhachium: Caesar lays siege to [another Roman general] at Dyrrhachium and withdraws before his forces can be decisively beaten

August 9 – Battle of Pharsalus: Caesar engages and defeats [another Roman general]

47 BC:

February – Battle of the Nile: Caesar engages and defeats ... [Alexandria and Egypt]

May – Battle of Zela: Caesar engages and defeats Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx (Veni, vidi, vici, or "I came, I saw, I conquered")

46 BC:

February – Battle of Thapsus: defeats the ... army of [another Roman general] in North Africa.

45 BC:

March 17 – Battle of Munda: defeats the ... forces of [two other Roman generals]
Had to work hard to get the spotlighting cleaned up :lmao:
 
Galileo is a great pick. 20 people are too many in this draft. Too much talent slipping away here in between picks. :lmao:
440 selections out of billions of possibilities. There really is no excuse for a poor selection in this draft. The only picks I have criticized so far had to do with my opinion that they were selected too early, not that they didn't belong. If we get a selection here at some point of someone who really does not belong, that will be a great embarrassment.
 
And now, it's become a game of guessing who's most likely to slip ... and figuring out that if someone doesn't slip, in which category it will it hurt the least. Therefore:

2.12 - Julius Caesar, Military Leader

Read more on the Military career of Julius Caesar

Gaius Julius Caesar ( 13 July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC), was a Roman military and political leader. He played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.

Historians place the generalship of Caesar as one of the greatest military strategists and tacticians who ever lived, along with Alexander the Great, Sun Tzu, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon Bonaparte. [His] tactical brilliance was highlighted by such feats as his circumvallation** of Alesia during the Gallic War, the rout of [another Roman general's] numerically superior forces at Pharsalus during the Civil War, and the complete destruction of [another foregin leader's] army at Battle of Zela.

Caesar's successful campaigning in any terrain and under all weather conditions owes much to the strict but fair discipline of his legionaries, whose admiration and devotion to him were proverbial due to his promotion of those of skill over those of nobility. Caesar's infantry and cavalry were first rate, and he made heavy use of formidable Roman artillery and his army's superlative engineering abilities. There was also the legendary speed with which he manoeuvred his troops; Caesar's army sometimes marched as many as 40 miles (64 km) a day.

Julius Caesar's Commentaries on the Gallic Wars describe how, during the siege of one Gallic city built on a very steep and high plateau, his engineers tunnelled through solid rock, found the source of the spring from which the town was drawing its water supply, and diverted it to the use of the army. The town, cut off from their water supply, capitulated at once.

Caesar also [employed an early form of battlefield cryptography], a cipher system to communicate with his generals which has now come to be known as the Caesar cipher.

** Investment, circumvallation, contravallation: Investment is the military tactic of surrounding an enemy fort (or town) with armed forces to prevent entry or escape.

A circumvallation is a line of fortifications, built by the attackers around the besieged fortification facing towards the enemy fort (to protect itself from sorties by its defenders and to enhance the blockade) ... The line of circumvallation can be used as a base for launching assaults against the besieged city or for constructing further earthworks nearer the city.

In cases where the besieging army is threatened by a field army allied to the enemy fort, the besieging army may construct a contravallation, a second line of fortifications outside the circumvallation, facing away from the enemy fort. The contravallation protects the besigers from attacks by allies of the city's defenders and enhances the blockade of the enemy fort by making it more difficult to smuggle in supplies.

The Siege of Alesia which took place in September 52 BC is one of the most famous investments in history. Julius Caesar in his Commentaries on the Gallic War describes his textbook use of the circumvallation and contravallation to defeat the Gauls ... The basic objectives and tactics of a military investment have remained the same down to today.
Roman battles fought by Julius Caesar:

Gallic War

58 BC:

June – Battle of the Arar (Saone): Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

July – Battle of Bibracte: Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

57 BC:

Battle of the Axona (Aisne): Caesar engages and defeats the Belgae

Battle of the Sabis (Sambre): Caesar defeats the Nervii.

52 BC:

Avaricum: Caesar takes this city by siege

Battle of Gergovia: [The Gauls] successfully stave of Caesar's siege with the help of a broken alliance.

Battle of Alesia: Caesar lays siege to Alesia and is simultaneously lain under siege by the [Gauls]; Caesar eventually defeats [the Gauls]

51 BC

Battle of Uxellodunum: Caesar lays siege to Uxellodunum, the last Gallic outpost in open revolt

Roman Civil War

48 BC:

July 10 – Battle of Dyrrhachium: Caesar lays siege to [another Roman general] at Dyrrhachium and withdraws before his forces can be decisively beaten

August 9 – Battle of Pharsalus: Caesar engages and defeats [another Roman general]

47 BC:

February – Battle of the Nile: Caesar engages and defeats ... [Alexandria and Egypt]

May – Battle of Zela: Caesar engages and defeats Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx (Veni, vidi, vici, or "I came, I saw, I conquered")

46 BC:

February – Battle of Thapsus: defeats the ... army of [another Roman general] in North Africa.

45 BC:

March 17 – Battle of Munda: defeats the ... forces of [two other Roman generals]
Had to work hard to get the spotlighting cleaned up :lmao:
This was the half guy I was pondering. Too many categories to put him in and not high enough in any, IMO, to take with who's still left. However, his name recognition might score some points in the voting stage since he is by far a "sexier" to people on first glance. I know he was to me at least.
 
BAM! There's one of the guys I was thinking of. Augustus is the #1 Leader IMO. Some might say he rode his daddy's coattails, but a closer look proves otherwise

Daddy made himself a King, which was an old term despised by the Romans, and why daddy ended up becoming senate's personal pincushion.

Augustus was the first emperor of the most dominant and influential empire in human history. He didn't slide into the role, first he fought a nasty civil war against two very powerful competitors. After winning, he lived a very long life devoted to both civic and military expansion that ensured Rome would be the most dominant force in the world for centuries to come.

Without Augustus, it's very possible the Rome would have reverted back to a republic of corrupt, self-serving politicians, who would have ran it into the ground within 100 years.

Augustus made Rome an empire.

As far as leaders go, I can't see anyone topping what he did.
I agree with most of this. Augustus is the guy I referred to earlier as the #1 leader in my book.
He's certainly in the top tier. Probably #1, but I'm not decided yet.
 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
I think it's only going to get worse. And of course it increases as your pick gets closer.And sugueing into snipes, are we going to have Polk Is A ##### Award for this draft?
 
In addition to the standard praise being showered on the last two picks, it should also be noted that:

1. Caesar's Palace is a fine hotel and casino.

2. Caesar's salad is a tasty dish if made correctly.

 
Augustus is a great pick, but he did not inherit his fathers empire.

He was adopted by his Great Uncle, who has yet to be picked
And quite frankly, its not hard to argue that Alexander's empire was more influential. Afterall, the language of the Roman Empire wasn't Latin, it was Koine Greek.
Perhaps. But Alexander was a greater general than leader. All he did was march and conquer. He didn't stop until a year or two before he died. Hell, he didn't even make it back home. He died at the age of 33 in Babylon, if my memory is correct. His empire might have been more influential, but it was much shorter lived. The reason for its short lifespan was it depended on nonstop expansion. He did very little in the way of infrastructure and civics - he just conquered. As soon as the mighty general died, the armies dispersed among his generals, and the empire folded. Not so with Augustus' empire.
I would also like to add that there are plenty more major empires than the ones taught in your average 8th grade ancient history class.
Did they last as long?Did they contribute as much to world culture?

The mythical Shang, Chou, the Chi'en (China) all were great and contributed a lot, but not as much as Rome.

Same with the Incas, Aztecs, and Mayans.

And all of those empires lack a solid #1 guy who contributed so much to their existence. There's no Augustus in those empires.

The closest figure I can compare is XXXX of Egypt. Even then, that Kingdom was around long before him and long after. He was merely the best of a long line of others.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;

I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.

The evil that men do lives after them;

The good is oft interred with their bones;

So let it be with Caesar.

 
I couldn't quote the whole speech because of all the spotlighting involved, but it's an amazing speech, one of Shakespeare's best, about how important a human being is in the long run. It ends with:

But here I am to speak what I do know.

You all did love him once, not without cause:

What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?

O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts,

And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;

My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,

And I must pause till it come back to me.

Of course, the Bard's Julius Caesar is a creation of his imagination, not the real man; probably not even a reasonable facsimile. But it's Shakespeare's representation that we remember; he has created history for us.

 
I missed much of the Augustus discussion that spotlit and underrated Julius Caesar. Just wanted to point out that without JC's military acumen, Augustus's empire is confined largely to a long strip of western Mediterranean coast ... far smaller and much less influential than it ended up being. Julius Caesar laid the groundwork for 2000 years of European cultural (if not political) solidarity.

 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
:goodposting: I need someone to take Oprah or Hulk Hogan... help a brother out.
Or
Elvis
...

(which, for all the mocking we did, netted thatguy 1st place)

Very solid drafting - maybe 2 or 3 slight reaches, but even those were not egregious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
:goodposting: I need someone to take Oprah or Hulk Hogan... help a brother out.
Pick 2.11 Joe (My Barber)No other person has contributed to the amount of tail I've conquered, besides myself. Without his cuts I'd be an average bum chasing any drunk fatty that'd roll in a blanket of flour. But with Joe, I've been transformed into a babe magnet. Joe has done this for a number of men, making him a general of studs, or perhaps a leader, or maybe just an intellectual on male beauty. He is the ultimate Wildcard. Go Joe!
 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
:cry: I need someone to take Oprah or Hulk Hogan... help a brother out.
Pick 2.11 Joe (My Barber)No other person has contributed to the amount of tail I've conquered, besides myself. Without his cuts I'd be an average bum chasing any drunk fatty that'd roll in a blanket of flour. But with Joe, I've been transformed into a babe magnet. Joe has done this for a number of men, making him a general of studs, or perhaps a leader, or maybe just an intellectual on male beauty. He is the ultimate Wildcard. Go Joe!
Is he also a plumber? :unsure:
 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
:cry: I need someone to take Oprah or Hulk Hogan... help a brother out.
Pick 2.11 Joe (My Barber)No other person has contributed to the amount of tail I've conquered, besides myself. Without his cuts I'd be an average bum chasing any drunk fatty that'd roll in a blanket of flour. But with Joe, I've been transformed into a babe magnet. Joe has done this for a number of men, making him a general of studs, or perhaps a leader, or maybe just an intellectual on male beauty. He is the ultimate Wildcard. Go Joe!
:unsure:
 
I missed much of the Augustus discussion that spotlit and underrated Julius Caesar. Just wanted to point out that without JC's military acumen, Augustus's empire is confined largely to a long strip of western Mediterranean coast ... far smaller and much less influential than it ended up being. Julius Caesar laid the groundwork for 2000 years of European cultural (if not political) solidarity.
1. This is spotlighting. Try being a bit more subtle. [EDIT: OOPS, totally missed him being picked. Apologies.] 2. This makes Daddy a good general (Military), not Leader. i.e. I think you're missing the point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I missed much of the Augustus discussion that spotlit and underrated Julius Caesar. Just wanted to point out that without JC's military acumen, Augustus's empire is confined largely to a long strip of western Mediterranean coast ... far smaller and much less influential than it ended up being. Julius Caesar laid the groundwork for 2000 years of European cultural (if not political) solidarity.
I didn't mean to underrate Caesar, he's among the first names that pop into my mind as great people in history. My main decision point for him is that he is much higher rated in military than as a leader and there are more of those guys I'd rate higher than there are leaders I would rate higher than Augustus. There is and will be a LOT of Ladderism. So many of our picks are going to be able to do what they did only because someone else did something big before them. The Plato/Socrates/Aristotle debate is a prime example. That's what makes the choices so hard. i tried to allude to the fact that Augusts' Empire was built on what Julius built before him but I worded it very poorly. Without the consolidation and conquest of JC, AC wouldn't have been able to concentrate inside his borders.

 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
:goodposting: I need someone to take Oprah or Hulk Hogan... help a brother out.
Pick 2.11 Joe (My Barber)No other person has contributed to the amount of tail I've conquered, besides myself. Without his cuts I'd be an average bum chasing any drunk fatty that'd roll in a blanket of flour. But with Joe, I've been transformed into a babe magnet. Joe has done this for a number of men, making him a general of studs, or perhaps a leader, or maybe just an intellectual on male beauty. He is the ultimate Wildcard. Go Joe!
Is he also a plumber? :bag:
No. But he does have a side gig as a conservative correspondent in Israel, which is practically the same thing.
 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
I think it's only going to get worse. And of course it increases as your pick gets closer.And sugueing into snipes, are we going to have Polk Is A ##### Award for this draft?
Looking at how everyone is drafting so far, I doubt I'll be Polking anyone here.
Dude I already got Polked by Andy Dufresne. ####### Gengis Khan.
 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
I think it's only going to get worse. And of course it increases as your pick gets closer.And sugueing into snipes, are we going to have Polk Is A ##### Award for this draft?
Looking at how everyone is drafting so far, I doubt I'll be Polking anyone here.
Dude I already got Polked by Andy Dufresne. ####### Gengis Khan.
To be a true Polking Andy would have needed to have Alexander on his roster already, and only picking Genghis out of deep seeded spite and malice.
 
Augustus is a great pick, but he did not inherit his fathers empire.

He was adopted by his Great Uncle, who has yet to be picked
And quite frankly, its not hard to argue that Alexander's empire was more influential. Afterall, the language of the Roman Empire wasn't Latin, it was Koine Greek.
Perhaps. But Alexander was a greater general than leader. All he did was march and conquer. He didn't stop until a year or two before he died. Hell, he didn't even make it back home. He died at the age of 33 in Babylon, if my memory is correct. His empire might have been more influential, but it was much shorter lived. The reason for its short lifespan was it depended on nonstop expansion. He did very little in the way of infrastructure and civics - he just conquered. As soon as the mighty general died, the armies dispersed among his generals, and the empire folded. Not so with Augustus' empire.
I would also like to add that there are plenty more major empires than the ones taught in your average 8th grade ancient history class.
Did they last as long?Did they contribute as much to world culture?

The mythical Shang, Chou, the Chi'en (China) all were great and contributed a lot, but not as much as Rome.

Same with the Incas, Aztecs, and Mayans.

And all of those empires lack a solid #1 guy who contributed so much to their existence. There's no Augustus in those empires.

The closest figure I can compare is XXXX of Egypt. Even then, that Kingdom was around long before him and long after. He was merely the best of a long line of others.
Dont forget Middle East, Indian, SE Asian, sub-Saharan African, Polish, Russian, Celtic.... I guess I dont see how you can credit Augustus with everything that was to become the Roman Empire. I think there are plenty of leaders that were more impressive in their lifetimes than Augustus. And when it comes down to it, many of hte most lasting contributions of Rome can be directly attributed to other people. And like every major power we're discussing other than the US, Rome eventually fell.

Basically, there are a ton of different ways of evaluating the leaders category. I mean, if we're going most influential, Im not picking Augustus as even the most influential Roman Emperor. There are alot of impressive rulers out there, just seems a shame that we should be judging them mainly on how large their Empire eventually became.

 
Solid solid choices up and down here. Sitting here waiting and watching people go is getting seriously frustrating.
I think it's only going to get worse. And of course it increases as your pick gets closer.And sugueing into snipes, are we going to have Polk Is A ##### Award for this draft?
Looking at how everyone is drafting so far, I doubt I'll be Polking anyone here.
Dude I already got Polked by Andy Dufresne. ####### Gengis Khan.
To be a true Polking Andy would have needed to have Alexander on his roster already, and only picking Genghis out of deep seeded spite and malice.
Solid point. I don't know much about Andy, but I think he has it in him to Polk me at least once or twice before we're through here.
 
And now, it's become a game of guessing who's most likely to slip ... and figuring out that if someone doesn't slip, in which category it will it hurt the least. Therefore:

2.12 - Julius Caesar, Military Leader

Read more on the Military career of Julius Caesar

Gaius Julius Caesar ( 13 July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC), was a Roman military and political leader. He played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.

Historians place the generalship of Caesar as one of the greatest military strategists and tacticians who ever lived, along with Alexander the Great, Sun Tzu, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon Bonaparte. [His] tactical brilliance was highlighted by such feats as his circumvallation** of Alesia during the Gallic War, the rout of [another Roman general's] numerically superior forces at Pharsalus during the Civil War, and the complete destruction of [another foregin leader's] army at Battle of Zela.

Caesar's successful campaigning in any terrain and under all weather conditions owes much to the strict but fair discipline of his legionaries, whose admiration and devotion to him were proverbial due to his promotion of those of skill over those of nobility. Caesar's infantry and cavalry were first rate, and he made heavy use of formidable Roman artillery and his army's superlative engineering abilities. There was also the legendary speed with which he manoeuvred his troops; Caesar's army sometimes marched as many as 40 miles (64 km) a day.

Julius Caesar's Commentaries on the Gallic Wars describe how, during the siege of one Gallic city built on a very steep and high plateau, his engineers tunnelled through solid rock, found the source of the spring from which the town was drawing its water supply, and diverted it to the use of the army. The town, cut off from their water supply, capitulated at once.

Caesar also [employed an early form of battlefield cryptography], a cipher system to communicate with his generals which has now come to be known as the Caesar cipher.

** Investment, circumvallation, contravallation: Investment is the military tactic of surrounding an enemy fort (or town) with armed forces to prevent entry or escape.

A circumvallation is a line of fortifications, built by the attackers around the besieged fortification facing towards the enemy fort (to protect itself from sorties by its defenders and to enhance the blockade) ... The line of circumvallation can be used as a base for launching assaults against the besieged city or for constructing further earthworks nearer the city.

In cases where the besieging army is threatened by a field army allied to the enemy fort, the besieging army may construct a contravallation, a second line of fortifications outside the circumvallation, facing away from the enemy fort. The contravallation protects the besigers from attacks by allies of the city's defenders and enhances the blockade of the enemy fort by making it more difficult to smuggle in supplies.

The Siege of Alesia which took place in September 52 BC is one of the most famous investments in history. Julius Caesar in his Commentaries on the Gallic War describes his textbook use of the circumvallation and contravallation to defeat the Gauls ... The basic objectives and tactics of a military investment have remained the same down to today.
Roman battles fought by Julius Caesar:

Gallic War

58 BC:

June – Battle of the Arar (Saone): Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

July – Battle of Bibracte: Caesar engages and defeats the Helvetii

57 BC:

Battle of the Axona (Aisne): Caesar engages and defeats the Belgae

Battle of the Sabis (Sambre): Caesar defeats the Nervii.

52 BC:

Avaricum: Caesar takes this city by siege

Battle of Gergovia: [The Gauls] successfully stave of Caesar's siege with the help of a broken alliance.

Battle of Alesia: Caesar lays siege to Alesia and is simultaneously lain under siege by the [Gauls]; Caesar eventually defeats [the Gauls]

51 BC

Battle of Uxellodunum: Caesar lays siege to Uxellodunum, the last Gallic outpost in open revolt

Roman Civil War

48 BC:

July 10 – Battle of Dyrrhachium: Caesar lays siege to [another Roman general] at Dyrrhachium and withdraws before his forces can be decisively beaten

August 9 – Battle of Pharsalus: Caesar engages and defeats [another Roman general]

47 BC:

February – Battle of the Nile: Caesar engages and defeats ... [Alexandria and Egypt]

May – Battle of Zela: Caesar engages and defeats Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx (Veni, vidi, vici, or "I came, I saw, I conquered")

46 BC:

February – Battle of Thapsus: defeats the ... army of [another Roman general] in North Africa.

45 BC:

March 17 – Battle of Munda: defeats the ... forces of [two other Roman generals]
Had to work hard to get the spotlighting cleaned up :goodposting:
I cannot really quarrel with this pick; I have him in my second tier. The first tier was Genghis Khan and Alexander. The second tier includes Napoleon and Caesar, as well as five others. Caesar was a master of organization and strategy; he was not particularly innovative in tactics, with the exception of the brilliance of the double walled battle of Alessia. But he relied on the training of his troops, and he trained them well and gained their loyalty and devotion.The remaining Roman legions were no match for his seasoned veterans once he crossed the Rubicon. Personally, I place him 6th in the tier, but a good argument can be made for any of them.

 
2. This makes Daddy a good general (Military), not Leader. i.e. I think you're missing the point.
Yup ... check the category in which I slotted JC.I didn't miss your point, but I am intentionally side-stepping it. My own point is only that Julius Caesar's accomplishments contributed in a huge measure to the greatness and influence of Augustus' empire.
 
For Andy Dufresne:

1.16: Plato - Philosopher

Plato was a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the western world.

Along with his mentor and his student, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy.

Which in my humble yet accurate opinion is the superior worldwide philosophy. :goodposting:

Is ideas on the state and the idea of democracy laid the foundation for governance in the (mostly) free western world and without him the world would be a much different, darker place.
It is impossible to talk too much about Plato without spotlighting two other giants of philosophy. Of course, we all know who those two are, so really, I think it matters little. A great pick and was on my short list.
Without a doubt the number one philosopher on my list. Whitehead once wrote that all of philosophy is but a footnote to Plato, I think he might have been right. That being said, as Plato is one of the figures I have studied most--I even learned to read Greek just so I could read Plato in his original language--much of what the tradition "said" was Plato's philosophy more than likely was not. Clearly Plato reveals something about his philosophical approach in his style. As Plato wrote in what is known as the "Seventh Letter," philosophy is something that happens in the mist of discourse. It is like a flash of lightening that lights up the area so you can see everything, but just long enough to know something was there, but not long enough to know what that was exactly.I can read Plato over and over and over and I find something new every time. From the way he frames his discourses to the attitudes particular individuals embody and the relationship of their names to the theme: such as Phadrus and Lysias. Just what Plato's philosophy was, however, remains in question. Irrespective of this matter, however, the fact that the tradition followed many of what I would term "Platonist" ideals and that we still struggle with many of the same questions today, proves that much of how we think remains defendant upon this man's influence.

I had ten "bigs" on my list. Now I have nine. Dufresne gets a big :lmao:

 
Without a doubt [Plato is] the number one philosopher on my list.
I cannot really quarrel with this pick [of Julius Caesar]. I have him in my second tier. The first tier was Genghis Khan and Alexander. The second tier includes Napoleon and Caesar, as well as five others ... Personally, I place him 6th in the tier ...
Oof -- I badly miscalculated.Two consolations: (1) Michelangelo has a shot at a #1 ranking of his own; and (2) Julius Caesar is a "name" guy.
 
2.13--Mao Zedong--Political Leader

Since 2 of the Top Three dictators of the 20th century have already been taken, I'll take the third. Mao led the Communist Party of China (CPC) to victory against the Kuomintang (KMT) in the Chinese Civil War, and was the leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from its establishment in 1949 until his death in 1976. Chairman Mao has been regarded as one of the most important figures in modern world history,[1] and named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.[2]

He is officially held in high regard in China where he is portrayed as a great revolutionary, political strategist, and military mastermind who defeated xxxxxxx in the Chinese Civil War, and then through his policies transformed the country into a major world power. Additionally, Mao is viewed by many in China as a poet, philosopher, and visionary.[3] However, Mao remains a controversial figure to this day, with a contentious and ever evolving legacy. Critics blame many of Mao's socio-political programs, such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, for causing severe damage to the culture, society, economy, and foreign relations of China, as well as a probable death toll in the tens of millions.[4]

From the Long March, to the Great Leap Forward to the Red Guards and the Cultural Revolution and the Little Red Book, Mao brought China kicking and screaming into the modern world. Maoism as a version of Communism was adopted by insurgent movements in may parts of the world.

 
2.13--Mao Zedong--Political Leader

Since 2 of the Top Three dictators of the 20th century have already been taken, I'll take the third. Mao led the Communist Party of China (CPC) to victory against the Kuomintang (KMT) in the Chinese Civil War, and was the leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from its establishment in 1949 until his death in 1976. Chairman Mao has been regarded as one of the most important figures in modern world history,[1] and named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.[2]

He is officially held in high regard in China where he is portrayed as a great revolutionary, political strategist, and military mastermind who defeated xxxxxxx in the Chinese Civil War, and then through his policies transformed the country into a major world power. Additionally, Mao is viewed by many in China as a poet, philosopher, and visionary.[3] However, Mao remains a controversial figure to this day, with a contentious and ever evolving legacy. Critics blame many of Mao's socio-political programs, such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, for causing severe damage to the culture, society, economy, and foreign relations of China, as well as a probable death toll in the tens of millions.[4]

From the Long March, to the Great Leap Forward to the Red Guards and the Cultural Revolution and the Little Red Book, Mao brought China kicking and screaming into the modern world. Maoism as a version of Communism was adopted by insurgent movements in may parts of the world.
A villain in my opinion.
 
Since I will be judging both of the Artist categories, I think it is fair to share what my criteria will be for evaluating the selections. I will be assigning a grade in each of the following categories:

Importance to their individual movement(s) (founding or representing the height of the movement)

Influence on subsequent movements (or later Artists in the same)

Innovation or advancement of their medium(s)

Global recognition

Creation of widely recognized masterpieces (Art that the layperson would recognize, and know who did it)

Intangibles (facts or body of work that add to the overall historical influence of the Artist)

I won't be commenting specifically on choices as they are made, but this should give you guideline about what may be important.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2.13--Mao Zedong--Political Leader

Since 2 of the Top Three dictators of the 20th century have already been taken, I'll take the third. Mao led the Communist Party of China (CPC) to victory against the Kuomintang (KMT) in the Chinese Civil War, and was the leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from its establishment in 1949 until his death in 1976. Chairman Mao has been regarded as one of the most important figures in modern world history,[1] and named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.[2]

He is officially held in high regard in China where he is portrayed as a great revolutionary, political strategist, and military mastermind who defeated xxxxxxx in the Chinese Civil War, and then through his policies transformed the country into a major world power. Additionally, Mao is viewed by many in China as a poet, philosopher, and visionary.[3] However, Mao remains a controversial figure to this day, with a contentious and ever evolving legacy. Critics blame many of Mao's socio-political programs, such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, for causing severe damage to the culture, society, economy, and foreign relations of China, as well as a probable death toll in the tens of millions.[4]

From the Long March, to the Great Leap Forward to the Red Guards and the Cultural Revolution and the Little Red Book, Mao brought China kicking and screaming into the modern world. Maoism as a version of Communism was adopted by insurgent movements in may parts of the world.
A villain in my opinion.
Yup. I don't think he's in the top five as a leader, but he sure as hell is in the top five as a villain. All time leader in death count.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top