Suppose you're watching a game, and your favorite team appears to score a go-ahead TD on the final play of the game, but there's a question about whether he stepped out of bounds at the one yard line.
By magic, you are the replay official on this play. Whatever you say goes -- and nobody else will even know that you are the replay official. (That's part of the magic.)
The replay shows that the runner did step out of bounds on the one.
Do you call the game correctly and make your team lose? Or call it incorrectly to make your team win?
If you would call the game correctly, then why would you prefer it if the real officials (in non-magical situations) called it incorrectly? Isn't that inconsistent?
I would call it correctly.
My preference as to what the real officials do doesn't control the outcome, meaning that the moral/ethical aspect of my preference is removed. It's not inconsistent at all.
Joss Whedon once said, "If nothing we do matters, then all that matters is what we do." It sort of stuck with me.If our actions do matter in some concrete way, than our choices may be made just for the results that matter. If you're good because you believe good acts get you into heaven and you want to go to heaven, that's a case where your actions are guided strongly because you perceive they matter.
But what about if/when nothing that we do matters? In the absence of some greater meaning or effect, then the only things that matter are our choices and why we make them. If there is absolutely no gain for me, no benefit or consequences, then my choices to be good or bad, ethical or unethical, kind or mean, is one of the truest reflections on my character.
So I read the bolded statement above, that since my preference doesn't control things -- i.e. it doesn't matter -- that it removes any moral or ethical responsibility from me. I don't buy that. I believe such a moment is the truer test of a person's character. I'd prefer my team win the game, but as it was meant to be played and called, on each team's merits and with as little decided by the refs bad judgement as possible. My desire to see my team win does not outweigh that I don't think an undeserving fan base should be subjected to what comes with losing on a bad call.
Sure I'm ok with bad calls cancelling out in that game. But that isn't even close to the case here since it's an otherwise perfectly officiated game. And there may be some teams or fans who at times I may think are deserving of things going against them for things they've chose to do in the past.
But overall, I think my preference does matter. I thought the "just win" choice in the poll would have more people vote for it, but I'm surprised it was as big of a landslide as it was.