Would you take Portis at #12/13? (1 Viewer)

[Pittsburgh United]

I just wanted to start a concise thread with this one specific question: Would you take Portis at #12/13?

 

[PatsWillWin]

Depends, is LT still available?

 

[Todem]

I would take him at 5

 

[B Maverick]

I would take him at 5

 

[Pittsburgh United]

Depends, is LT still available?

I have a good indication round 1 will go like this:1 - LJ2 - LT3 - Alexander4 - Tiki5 - SJax6 - Manning7 - Ronnie8 - Rudi9 - Edge 10 - Caddy11 - FWP12 ........I was thinking Lamont/Mcgahee, but I'm wondering if it's worth taking a shot on Portis.

 

[PatsWillWin]

For me, Jordan > Portis > McGahee

So I voted no.

 

[J-Co]

Depends on the scoring system. In PPR, I'd take Chad Johnson, Holt or Steve Smith (whoever your highest on) and not look back. In PPR, if you must have a RB I'd consider Bush, McGahee and Westbrook there also, though Portis certainly wouldn't be a "bad" pick. In non-PPR Portis is a little more attractive, though you could still make an argument for all of these same players I mentioned above.

 

[Pittsburgh United]

We're not PPR. I am definitely going RB/RB at 12/13.

 

[glen5839]

I'd take Michael Jordan.

 

[pantofful]

You should specify:

.

1.) keeper/not - (if keeper Portis' value goes up a bit as this isn't a long term injury issue).

2.) PPR of not - if PPR Jordan's receptions should easily put him ahead of Portis.

 

[PatsWillWin]

We're not PPR. I am definitely going RB/RB at 12/13.

Well, that's kind of a different poll question, don't you think? I voted no in favor of Jordan, but assuming you're definately going RB/RB, I would vote "yes" on a Jordan/Portis combo.

 

[Pittsburgh United]

So I'm seriously leaning towards Jordan/Portis.